What should we make of Christian biblical scholars? Before they've said a word, they have most likely already decided that not only was there a historical Jesus, but he was magical too.
They literally can't come to the conclusion that in fact the case for even a historical Jesus is weak, can they? I'm not trying to be mean. I'm honestly asking what should be made of their opinion. Of course, if they are simply presenting proper evidence and sound arguments, then that works fine. And when Christians scholars are forced to concede something about the bible, you can be pretty sure it's legit! So I guess they are the final frontier.
I love Richard Carrier and I want to have his babies.
They literally can't come to the conclusion that in fact the case for even a historical Jesus is weak, can they? I'm not trying to be mean. I'm honestly asking what should be made of their opinion. Of course, if they are simply presenting proper evidence and sound arguments, then that works fine. And when Christians scholars are forced to concede something about the bible, you can be pretty sure it's legit! So I guess they are the final frontier.
I love Richard Carrier and I want to have his babies.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum