Posts: 3101
Threads: 10
Joined: September 7, 2015
Reputation:
49
RE: Ask A Historian
September 14, 2015 at 8:00 pm
(This post was last modified: September 14, 2015 at 8:01 pm by TheRocketSurgeon.
Edit Reason: forgot the 's
)
I very much enjoyed Toland's The Rising Sun, as well as Infamy which, while I did not agree with his conclusion about foreknowledge of the attack on Pearl Harbor, shocked me into how much about the leadup to Pearl Harbor I did not know, where the Brits, Dutch, and Americans did practically everything in their power to get Japan to hit us somewhere as a way to incentivize the isolationist American people to enter WW2. The more likely explanation, to me, has always been racism: we didn't think the Japanese were intelligent enough to hit us as hard and as thoroughly as they did, and as a result made a lot of stupid errors that compounded the damage. I also wanted to read his book about Hitler, but unfortunately it was in high demand among the Nazi sympathizers that are rampant in the Missouri prison system, and I never got a chance to pick it up.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
Posts: 69246
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Ask A Historian
September 18, 2015 at 7:11 pm
(This post was last modified: September 18, 2015 at 7:12 pm by Minimalist.)
I'm going from memory here but as I recall in The Rising Sun, Toland dismissed the Pearl Harbor conspiracy nonsense for the very reason that the US and UK were tracking the Japanese invasion fleet on its way to Malaya and anticipated an assault on the Philippines. They were still working on the theory that an attack on the fleet at Pearl Harbor ( similar to what the British had pulled at Taranto) was not possible because the water was too shallow for aerial torpedoes to be dropped without hitting bottom. The Japanese found a solution to that problem.
The UK sent Repulse and Prince of Wales to intercept the Jap fleet but it was 1941 and the lesson about capital ships operating without proper air cover had yet to be learned.
By December 8, everyone had gotten that message.
Posts: 3101
Threads: 10
Joined: September 7, 2015
Reputation:
49
RE: Ask A Historian
September 19, 2015 at 1:13 am
(This post was last modified: September 19, 2015 at 1:14 am by TheRocketSurgeon.)
We're discussing various conspiracies, now. That we knew they were going to hit us, that we very likely set things up to where they had to hit us, somewhere (yes the Philippines was the obvious choice), seems little in-doubt. It's also probable that they felt that even if the Japanese managed to hit Hawaii, the damage done at Pearl, even if the Japanese fleet could get close enough, would be minimal, since they expected to have enough warning to get the planes off the ground, and thought the harbor too shallow for torpedoes and the battlewagons impervious to the carrier aircraft bombs. (The lesson of the lethality of the dive bomber hadn't been yet learned, either.)
I think they expected a general attack against numerous military targets, with the Japanese fleet spread out to attack each, and that would be damage we could weather. They didn't anticipate Yamamoto's plan to make a "decisive" strike against our seemingly-impregnable forward fleet base with practically every ship he had, and to successfully cross half the Pacific Ocean undetected. We (our politicians and Generals/Admirals) simply didn't think they were smart enough to come up with something that good.
It's not quite simple American racism or idiocy; despite their reputation as fierce warriors, and their surprise attack on Port Arthur in the previous decades, the Japanese Admiralty were known for being cautious/conservative, and not wanting to stick their necks out much.
(September 18, 2015 at 7:11 pm)Minimalist Wrote: The UK sent Repulse and Prince of Wales to intercept the Jap fleet but it was 1941 and the lesson about capital ships operating without proper air cover had yet to be learned.
By December 8, everyone had gotten that message.
It's a damned shame, too. Those were such beautiful ships. The Brits could build 'em!
By the way, M, you should know that most people (at least in the USA) consider "Jap" to be a racist epithet against the Japanese. I know you don't mean to use it in a derogatory fashion, but it makes me cringe each time I see it.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
Posts: 69246
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Ask A Historian
September 19, 2015 at 2:54 am
They also had a plan to convert battleship shells into aerial bombs by fitting them with fins. The Aichi's couldn't lift them but the Nakajimas could.
Yeah...I'm a product of my upbringing. Every war movie referred to them as Japs and it stuck. For the record I have a Nissan and a Mazda in my garage so it's just jargon.
The only problem with the conspiracies to make Japan attack us is that Roosevelt wanted to get into the European war with his pal, Winnie. Pearl Harbor guaranteed that on 12/8/41 every American was ripping mad at Japan and no one gave a fuck about Germany. Roosevelt could not have know that Hitler would save his ass by being so stupid as to declare war on us. Greatly simplified Roosevelt's life but for a few days he must have been shitting bricks.
Posts: 6843
Threads: 0
Joined: February 22, 2014
Reputation:
15
RE: Ask A Historian
September 19, 2015 at 5:05 am
Posts: 69246
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Ask A Historian
September 19, 2015 at 11:53 am
I think you mean the B-17 Wyrd. The B-29 program dates to 1938 and, as a precision high-level bomber it was something of a flop.
Posts: 6843
Threads: 0
Joined: February 22, 2014
Reputation:
15
RE: Ask A Historian
September 19, 2015 at 5:54 pm
(September 19, 2015 at 11:53 am)Minimalist Wrote: I think you mean the B-17 Wyrd. The B-29 program dates to 1938 and, as a precision high-level bomber it was something of a flop.
As I said, the US did fund the B29 as the primary weapons system to be used against Japan before the war started. Germany & Japan did not have a similar bomber. They thought that they were fighting a war like WWI. The B29 was very effective against Japan, which was its purpose.
Posts: 5165
Threads: 514
Joined: December 26, 2013
Reputation:
60
RE: Ask A Historian
September 19, 2015 at 6:29 pm
Do you think American history books are whitewashed or too Eurocentric?
Posts: 5165
Threads: 514
Joined: December 26, 2013
Reputation:
60
RE: Ask A Historian
September 19, 2015 at 6:30 pm
Who's your favorite figure in history?
Posts: 69246
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Ask A Historian
September 19, 2015 at 7:24 pm
|