Clerk Defies Supreme Court, Refuses Gay Marriage Licenses

[Longhorn]

Jesus Fucking Christ !!!

#Selfcest?

[Redbeard The Pink]

Jesus Fucking Christ !!!

#Selfcest?

Jesus...you're fucking disgusting...the very idea is an abomination...


...-cest is a Latin root. The word would be "suicest"

[MTL]

Kim Davis had as an elected official a duty to follow the law. But then again so did the clerks who broke the law to issue licenses when it wasn't legal to do so. None of them went to jail. What about the mayors and officials in so called sanctuary cities? None of them are in jail. The US constitution has been tortured to the point where anything can be ratioalized no matter how intrusive. The fact is that our governing authorities ignore the law when it is convenient or fits their adgenda. I mourn the lose of a once great nation.

She's not in jail for refusing to issue licenses. She's in jail for contempt of court. If you'd wanted to make a case of the clerks who issued licenses when it wasn't legal, you should have made your case then.

Stellar.

[Longhorn]

Hey, I'm the one who came up with it

[Minimalist]

Um, when wasn't it "legal" Chad?  Many states had legalized it before the court decision told these jesus freak motherfuckers to eat shit.

You can fucking join them, for all I care.

[Rhondazvous]

Jesus Fucking Christ !!!

lol....funny story:

I have a friend in France, who is making good progress as he tries to learn English.

Swearing is done differently in French, you see,

so he asked me to clarify that very statement:  "Jesus Fucking Christ";

....because "fucking" is technically a verb....

He didn't understand why Jesus was "fucking himself" LOLOLOL

Hey, if he can send himself to Earth and pray to himself and sacrifice himself to himself, why can't he fuck himself? Maybe that's what he was doing the first 30 years of his life and the biblical writers just didn't want to talk about it.

[vorlon13]

It's my recollection in Cooper v. Cooper (might have been another case) one of the parties seeking a divorce scoured all the paperwork in the courthouse for a misplaced comma, dropped decimal point, misplaced reference, improper credentials, ANYTHING to prove the couple was not legally married in the first place and that obviously has implications for alimony, inheritance, earnings accrued during the interim, etc.

The jist of the ruling was, if the couple exercised due diligence, that is, went to the courthouse, filled out the forms, yada, yada, yada, they are married, PERIOD, even if the court house personnel were actually lizards wearing the human rinds of that days breakfast.

This is pretty established law, although, with the countries current fascination with class action lawsuits (disclaimer: I'm on my third one now) it might be a matter of time till some law firm somewhere makes a case that everyone married in Buttphart county Idaho was emotionally distressed because every marriage license form was printed incorrectly (i before e except after z) and therefore, some of the entitled class might have, however briefly, been shocked to ponder they might have been shacking up instead of legally wed for the last 18 years.

You can see some of those weddings performed in Frisco by Newscome, for instance, might have been challenged since gay marriage wasn't legal statewide at the time and then the couples could have cited Cooper v. Cooper, and asserted they went to the courthouse, paid the fee, filled out the forms and are legally married despite the behind the scenes machinations that occurred.

Then you have Cooper v. Cooper in the cross hairs and the repercussions might be considerable.

[Rhondazvous]

It's my recollection in Cooper v. Cooper (might have been another case) one of the parties seeking a divorce scoured all the paperwork in the courthouse for a misplaced comma, dropped decimal point, misplaced reference, improper credentials, ANYTHING to prove the couple was not legally married in the first place and that obviously has implications for alimony, inheritance, earnings accrued during the interim, etc.

The jist of the ruling was, if the couple exercised due diligence, that is, went to the courthouse, filled out the forms, yada, yada, yada, they are married, PERIOD, even if the court house personnel were actually lizards wearing the human rinds of that days breakfast.

This is pretty established law, although, with the countries current fascination with class action lawsuits (disclaimer: I'm on my third one now) it might be a matter of time till some law firm somewhere makes a case that everyone married in Buttphart county Idaho was emotionally distressed because every marriage license form was printed incorrectly (i before e except after z) and therefore, some of the entitled class might have, however briefly, been shocked to ponder they might have been shacking up instead of legally wed for the last 18 years.

You can see some of those weddings performed in Frisco by Newscome, for instance,  might have been challenged since gay marriage wasn't legal statewide at the time and then the couples could have cited Cooper v. Cooper, and asserted they went to the courthouse, paid the fee, filled out the forms and are legally married despite the behind the scenes machinations that occurred.

Then you have Cooper v. Cooper in the cross hairs and the repercussions might be considerable.

That might settle the question of whether the marriage licenses will be legally binding without the signature of the clerk. But then, that might be up to the state.

[MTL]

What principles ??

She finds out she isn't going to get laid by hubby # whatever while incarcerated and she is going to change her mind.

Maybe they'll let her have a butt plug.

[vorlon13]

Obviously, a Doc Johnson model 34 with realistic veining, retractable foreskin and optional vibrator attachment with Energy Star certified wall charger and lithium ion rechargeable battery pack for extend run time.