Admin Abuse

[Edwardo Piet]

Okay... when you're less tired.

Actually, I think I'll go create that thread myself... good idea

EvF

[fr0d0]

Adrian : you're an atheist

Leo : my clown is better than yours

Darwinian : the anti wrinke cream makes your penis fall off

Eilonnwy : <scrub that I'm too scared>

[Darwinian]

What penis? :S

[Violet]

What penis? :S

Darwinian abuses himself... do we REALLY have to abuse him?

[Autumnlicious]

I love this thread so fucking much.

Almost as much as I love all you fuckers.

Except Sae. But that is only because she sets the standard. /damn you to Hel... oh wait, you're in Alaska. Sweet. Carry on.

(Yes, I spelt Hel right.)

[The_Flying_Skeptic]

Ironically, you've managed to now piss off the entire admin team:

leo-rcc: On arrival.
Eilonnwy & Adrian: By failing to show up twice to podcast recordings.
Darwinian: By insulting him for no reason.

*applauds*

Luckily we're all fair; we don't hold grudges. I still stand by Darwinian in this case; he handled the case perfectly well. He didn't warn or threaten to ban AngelThMan; he just pointed out the rules.

yeah, for the record, i did not say Darwinian was threatening to ban angelman.

[Violet]

Except Sae. But that is only because she sets the standard. /damn you to Hel... oh wait, you're in Alaska. Sweet. Carry on.

Oh you bastard At least I'm not in a place where it is possible to die of heat stroke

[Tiberius]

yeah, for the record, i did not say Darwinian was threatening to ban angelman.

No, you made it entirely clear that you thought he had abused his admin powers. He hadn't. He'd done exactly what I expected him to do: enforce the rules of the forum. It was a polite warning, explaining that AngelThMan had no right to insist on his own rules in a thread, to which AngelThMan agreed and apologised.

Why you thought that needed attacking is still beyond me.

[Edwardo Piet]

Darwinian pretty much couldn't be more polite - for him to be attacked for "admin abuse" immediately sounds implausible as it is. Maybe not impossible but you only have to read what Darwinian actually said and he was doing his job perfectly well - no such "abuse" from him at all.

I find it particularly bizarre that Flying Skeptic seemed to think AngelThMan was being abused and needed defending when AngelThMan had already agreed and apologized, that is indeed bizarre. Why bother defending someone who has already apologized? Even if you do think they need defending for such a weird reason - can't you let them do their own thinking?

EvF

[fr0d0]

Skep has already apologised. I find it bizarre that you feel the need to berate him for this.