Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 20, 2024, 3:04 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"All Scientists Should Be Militant Atheists"
#21
RE: "All Scientists Should Be Militant Atheists"
(September 11, 2015 at 11:25 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote:
(September 11, 2015 at 10:56 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: What? His name was Georges Lemaître. And he was not a child molester. 

They're pulling your chain, Cath! Get it? "big bang?"

If you read the article, Krauss is pretty clear why he says what he says, and it's not that he thinks it should be required in the dictatorial sense of the term, like some kind of exclusive club. It's that when you do science, it's methodological naturalism, so God isn't required at any point in the work. Thus, he says, it's a pointless thing, even for those scientists who still hold beliefs in the supernatural outside of the realm of science. Despite all the "bomb-throwing", it's actually a fairly unremarkable article, and I think you would be less offended by the jokes here if you read it to get full context. Smile

God is not "required at any point in the work" for most fields lol.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
#22
RE: "All Scientists Should Be Militant Atheists"
(September 11, 2015 at 11:46 pm)AFTT47 Wrote: Just read the wiki article on Georges Lemaître. I had never heard of him. It sounds like he was a classic example of a scientist leading a double life, so to speak. And he did exactly what any good scientist is supposed to do: check any personal feelings at the laboratory door and follow the evidence where it leads.

Leading a double life? How so?
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
#23
RE: "All Scientists Should Be Militant Atheists"
I think the Mormon hierarchy is there too.

(really)
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




Reply
#24
RE: "All Scientists Should Be Militant Atheists"
According to anecdote, Pope Pius was really intrigued by Lemaître's idea when they discussed it and said - Ahaa, fantastic! Finally, proof for a point of creation, should I put it in the official doctrine? And Lemaître was like "Nooo, that's not how science works, pops!"
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#25
RE: "All Scientists Should Be Militant Atheists"
(September 11, 2015 at 11:50 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:
(September 11, 2015 at 11:46 pm)AFTT47 Wrote: Just read the wiki article on Georges Lemaître. I had never heard of him. It sounds like he was a classic example of a scientist leading a double life, so to speak. And he did exactly what any good scientist is supposed to do: check any personal feelings at the laboratory door and follow the evidence where it leads.

Leading a double life? How so?

Scientist at work and theologian at home.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.

Albert Einstein
Reply
#26
RE: "All Scientists Should Be Militant Atheists"
(September 12, 2015 at 12:12 am)AFTT47 Wrote:
(September 11, 2015 at 11:50 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Leading a double life? How so?

Scientist at work and theologian at home.

I thought scientist priest at work, maverick race car driver at home... Tongue
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#27
RE: "All Scientists Should Be Militant Atheists"
(September 12, 2015 at 12:21 am)Alex K Wrote:
(September 12, 2015 at 12:12 am)AFTT47 Wrote: Scientist at work and theologian at home.

I thought scientist priest at work, maverick race car driver at home... Tongue

Scientist/priest at work by day, international spy and pseudonymous gambler "man of mystery" by night...
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost

I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.

Reply
#28
RE: "All Scientists Should Be Militant Atheists"
(September 11, 2015 at 9:03 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:
(September 11, 2015 at 4:30 pm)ScepticOrganism Wrote: I fully agree as well. If anything, it should be mandatory.

You don't think a non atheist should be allowed to be a scientist? This seems a little unreasonable. The scientist who first presented the idea of the Big Bang was a Catholic priest.


I distinguish a scientific technician from a scientist.   A scientific technician can do great science through expert practice of the craft of science, but while he can be adept at exploiting the ability to science to achieve results, he need not embrace the implications of why science can achieve these results that nonscience can not.  A real scientist ought to embrace the reason why science can achieve what it achieves, and consequently can not but reject not necessarily the existence of God, but necessarily reject instead the acceptance of the proposition that God either exists or that God ought to exist.
Reply
#29
RE: "All Scientists Should Be Militant Atheists"
(September 12, 2015 at 12:12 am)AFTT47 Wrote:
(September 11, 2015 at 11:50 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Leading a double life? How so?

Scientist at work and theologian at home.

Ah ok. When you said double life, it made me think you were implying something inappropriate. There is nothing wrong with being a scientist and a priest at the same time.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
#30
RE: "All Scientists Should Be Militant Atheists"
Quote:Who can over estimate the progress of the world if all the money wasted in superstition could be used to enlighten, elevate and civilize mankind?
-- Robert Green Ingersoll,
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Militant Atheism? Data 274 10190 September 24, 2023 at 8:02 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Christianity's Valuable Contributions to Humanity: An Examination of Militant Atheism Nishant Xavier 137 6866 September 8, 2023 at 4:18 am
Last Post: no one
  Atheists, if all Southern Americans are backwards? BillieBobbie 44 3864 April 1, 2023 at 4:25 am
Last Post: Goosebump
  I enjoy far right atheists more than lgbt marxist atheists Sopra 4 2193 February 28, 2018 at 9:09 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  a challenge All atheists There is inevitably a Creator. Logic says that suni_muslim 65 14389 November 28, 2017 at 5:02 pm
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut
  Could Gods hypothetically be atheistic scientists? causal code 5 2612 August 24, 2017 at 12:17 am
Last Post: Astonished
  Atheists, tell me, a Roman Catholic: why should I become an atheist? Balaco 596 92604 June 14, 2017 at 3:26 am
Last Post: Omnisofos
  A question to all atheists! Gestas 190 20377 January 30, 2017 at 7:38 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Scientists discover new form of matter in 2017. (The end of human suffering?) %mindless_detector% 17 5160 January 29, 2017 at 11:16 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  All you god hating atheists! Socratic Meth Head 5 1371 April 1, 2016 at 9:01 am
Last Post: Little lunch



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)