Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
155
RE: For future reference
October 9, 2015 at 7:30 pm
(October 9, 2015 at 7:15 pm)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote: (October 9, 2015 at 1:50 pm)Stimbo Wrote: I await the honour of being reacquainted with this world with eager anticipation and turgid expectation and I just know you all had to Google at least one of these words. (emphasis is mine)
Sorry, Stimbo. Some of us have vocabularies consisting of more than 100 words and a handful of abbreviations.
I'm pleased to have my presupposition falsified.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 46815
Threads: 545
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
108
RE: For future reference
October 9, 2015 at 7:34 pm
(October 9, 2015 at 7:15 pm)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote: (October 9, 2015 at 1:50 pm)Stimbo Wrote: I await the honour of being reacquainted with this world with eager anticipation and turgid expectation and I just know you all had to Google at least one of these words. (emphasis is mine)
Sorry, Stimbo. Some of us have vocabularies consisting of more than 100 words and a handful of abbreviations.
Y u gotta b all dooshy an stuff 2 us. u r being rood 4 no gd reesun.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
132
RE: For future reference
October 9, 2015 at 7:42 pm
nutin wong at al wid no vocabwowee
Posts: 10470
Threads: 165
Joined: May 29, 2013
Reputation:
53
RE: For future reference
October 9, 2015 at 7:49 pm
I forgot to buy deturgid at Ralphs.
"For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan
Posts: 46815
Threads: 545
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
108
RE: For future reference
October 9, 2015 at 7:49 pm
Y'rite. I speeks english goodly enuff
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
154
RE: For future reference
October 9, 2015 at 7:51 pm
(This post was last modified: October 9, 2015 at 7:57 pm by robvalue.)
(October 9, 2015 at 6:24 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: I've often wondered how heterosexual men work through the 'logic' of not being effeminate at all, but still desiring the female stuff for stimulation and sexy time.
Isn't it more masculine and 100% less feminine to get the nookie from masculine (willing) virile men than foofy frilly girly girls ??
![Tongue Tongue](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
I reckon my personality is closer to female than male, if that means anything at all. My wife also thinks I'm slightly camp, which I was a little surprised at, but not offended. I don't go out of my way to behave masculine or feminine, I'm just me. According to a program about closet gays, I met all the criteria for one (from a woman who said she "should have seen the signs"; I have all those signs).
I don't exactly know why I'm telling you all this ![Tongue Tongue](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/tongue.gif) I've never been even close to bicurious though, but I wouldn't have minded one bit if I was. I may actually have preferred it, as I somehow feel I'm missing out! I wonder what it's like to be a woman, and what it's like to be gay/bi. So in that way I'm curious, but I don't have enough desire for it to amount to anything. I'm not however at all repulsed by the image of man/man sex like some people are, but neither do I find it stimulating. And even though sex to me isn't essential for being with someone, I don't think I could feel that way about a man like I could with a woman. I find that a little puzzling, but I guess it's normal.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
155
RE: For future reference
October 9, 2015 at 8:03 pm
(October 9, 2015 at 7:49 pm)c172 Wrote: I forgot to buy deturgid at Ralphs.
That really needs to be a thing. Too much turgid is not exactly a picnic. I was that soldier...
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 1587
Threads: 21
Joined: June 13, 2015
Reputation:
26
RE: For future reference
October 9, 2015 at 8:47 pm
(October 9, 2015 at 7:51 pm)robvalue Wrote: (October 9, 2015 at 6:24 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: I've often wondered how heterosexual men work through the 'logic' of not being effeminate at all, but still desiring the female stuff for stimulation and sexy time.
Isn't it more masculine and 100% less feminine to get the nookie from masculine (willing) virile men than foofy frilly girly girls ??
![Tongue Tongue](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
I reckon my personality is closer to female than male, if that means anything at all. My wife also thinks I'm slightly camp, which I was a little surprised at, but not offended. I don't go out of my way to behave masculine or feminine, I'm just me. According to a program about closet gays, I met all the criteria for one (from a woman who said she "should have seen the signs"; I have all those signs).
I don't exactly know why I'm telling you all this I've never been even close to bicurious though, but I wouldn't have minded one bit if I was. I may actually have preferred it, as I somehow feel I'm missing out! I wonder what it's like to be a woman, and what it's like to be gay/bi. So in that way I'm curious, but I don't have enough desire for it to amount to anything. I'm not however at all repulsed by the image of man/man sex like some people are, but neither do I find it stimulating. And even though sex to me isn't essential for being with someone, I don't think I could feel that way about a man like I could with a woman. I find that a little puzzling, but I guess it's normal.
There's thousands of different cases that could be cited;
Years ago, I used to wonder why so many lesbians were so butch, when they liked women;
you think they'd be more feminine???
Same with gay men; I wondered, if they're into what is masculine,
why are so many, so effeminate?
But then I got older and realized that there's a vast vast grey area and you can't generalize
Posts: 30129
Threads: 304
Joined: April 18, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: For future reference
October 10, 2015 at 12:48 am
Appearances are can be deceiving too.
I recall the first 'leather dude' I encountered long, long ago. I was really startled when once we were alone, he was quite passive. Didn't dampen our fun for long, and I developed a little deeper understanding how playing against type can be fun. I had a complementary experience with a 'drag queen' one night too, but I had an inkling it was headed in that direction long before I was pinned and plugged.
OTOH, guys with enormous peenies that only want to bottom, um, REALLY ?? WTF man ? You've got a howitzer there and don't want to show it off ?? Yes Ken, I'm talking about you.
I hate size queens too.
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
Posts: 15755
Threads: 194
Joined: May 15, 2009
Reputation:
145
RE: For future reference
October 10, 2015 at 12:54 am
(October 9, 2015 at 4:41 pm)Evie Wrote: I can't believe that best turtle is winning so far ![Heart Heart](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/heart.gif)
Why not?
You should have more faith in Best Turtle.
.... But...
He is not The Potential.
* Violet is Best Worm.
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
|