Is Amazon Kindle Good for the Environment?
June 22, 2010 at 2:42 pm
(This post was last modified: June 22, 2010 at 2:44 pm by The_Flying_Skeptic.)
I recently bought a Kindle and a minor reason I chose to buy it was because it is better for the environment. However, I'm not suer if the Kindle truly is better for the environment. I've been investigating this claim on the webs and have found conflicting information. According to a study carried out by the Clean Tech Group(source), the Kindle is better for the environment than paper books.
but I also read some interesting comments that need to be taken into consideration
but I also read some interesting comments that need to be taken into consideration
Quote:There is nothing green about this. Miniature digital technology (cell phones lap tops ipods, kindles) causes slavery and massive deforestation in the DRC. Google “cell phone DRC” if you don’t believe me.
Comment by Richard — March 11, 2009 @ 3:21 pm
Quote:Marco, on May 30, 2009 at 10:31 am Said:
I have to say, I’m a bit skeptical: My books will stay on their shelves for 50 years and then, with luck, will belong to someone else. I already get my newspapers online and the occasional one I pick up at the newsstand is recycled. The Kindle is 100-percent petroleum and will end up breaking down in two or three years. Not sure how anyone could unequivocally argue that a Kindle is greener than a book…
Quote:Shawn, on February 22, 2010 at 9:43 am Said:Do you think the Kindle is better for the environment? Why or why not?
The carbon footprint generated by servers, storage devices, PCs, etc. is quite large. In fact, a Swedish study claims that the envinronmental impact of reading news online for more than 30 minutes a day has more impact than one year of consumption of a printed newspaper. Who woulda thunk it?
The study concluded that the use of electronic media over printed material trades a renewable resource (trees) for a nonrenewable one (fossil fuels used in energy production).