Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 14, 2024, 2:02 am
Thread Rating:
Women's clothes?
|
RE: Women's clothes?
January 16, 2016 at 11:21 pm
(This post was last modified: January 16, 2016 at 11:32 pm by MTL.)
(January 16, 2016 at 11:14 pm)bennyboy Wrote:(January 16, 2016 at 10:53 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Perhaps women shouldn't be "surprised" when that happens, but that still doesn't give men an excuse to objectify a woman. Men are not dogs and still have the ability to look away or to refrain from seeing a fellow human being as an object. Oh dear god. i see the problem now. If a sexy woman doesn't respond to your advances, then SHE is guilty of being judgmental. Silly me. She should be diplomatic and sleep with every guy who makes an advance.
This is another shit shit and run thread.
Hey I'm just having fun with it. I completely agree with the women on this one. They get to dress the way they like and no way they choose to dress is equivalent to inviting or permitting sexual contact. But when it comes to 'staring', I'm entitled to my field of vision. You don't want it looked at? Don't bring it into the zone. Hell, I'm not looking for anything more any way. I'll damn well enjoy the view.
I don't have the urge to stare unless the staring is encouraged and wanted.
(January 16, 2016 at 11:21 pm)MTL Wrote:(January 16, 2016 at 11:14 pm)bennyboy Wrote: Actually, I think there's a hidden double-standard here. When a woman dresses provocatively, I think she knows it. And if the RIGHT PERSON notices, she'll be happy as hell. What she doesn't like is when someone she doesn't want to attract is attracted-- that is annoying for her. And that is a double standard, because she's judging some men as not being sexy/attractive/rich/whatever enough to deserve the show that she's putting on. In making herself attractive and enforcing standards, she's not only objectifying herself, but the men who she might implicity reject. That would be the democratic approach. Thanks. (January 16, 2016 at 11:14 pm)bennyboy Wrote:(January 16, 2016 at 10:53 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Perhaps women shouldn't be "surprised" when that happens, but that still doesn't give men an excuse to objectify a woman. Men are not dogs and still have the ability to look away or to refrain from seeing a fellow human being as an object. Why are you talking about this hypothetical woman as if she represents all women? People choose how to dress based on whatever reasoning they feel is right for themselves at the time. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Legitimate women's rights issues | Lemonvariable72 | 50 | 8901 |
October 30, 2015 at 7:01 am Last Post: Lemonvariable72 |
|
Men and Women equal? No, never. | ideologue08 | 131 | 45562 |
May 27, 2013 at 2:04 pm Last Post: Gilgamesh |
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)