vote Donald trump!?

[scoobysnack]

Whoever promises free jet packs for all gets my vote.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1SCu9yiBlo

[Thumpalumpacus]

Still waiting for your numbers, Scooby. Don't think you'll get a free ride on that one, Bub.

[scoobysnack]

Well that's true, since I know a few.

I've seen more death threats towards Trump from leftitsts than I've ever seen against anyone.

https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&vert...2&src=typd

So you've researched death threats against everyone else? You've counted the death threats against Menachim Begin, Malcolm X, and every other human? Because that's what "anyone" means. Never mind the fact that your link doesn't actually tally up a number, never mind the fact that it doesn't support the claim you've made.

No, you haven't done that.  What you've done is feed your confirmation bias.

Prove me wrong, or color me unimpressed.  I want you to go search out death threats for Trump, tally up that number, and then do the same for Barack Obama. I want hard numbers. You've made a solid claim here.  Certainly you have hard numbers, right? Here, this will be even better: give us the top ten people subject to death threats.

Or, alternatively, you can shut your fucking trap because you're talking out of your ass, making exaggerated claims, trying to use hyperbole to sway opinion, and therefore being a cunt.

(By the way, "cunt" isn't something we learn in Liberal PC School to insult people like you ... it's just what I think you're being right now for talking out your backside when you should know better.)

Well here's a link

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-congres...ton-023214

And I chose my words wisely. I said: I've seen more death threats towards Trump from leftists than I've ever seen against anyone.

All that means is what i've seen, not all that exists. Look in the comment sections in countless articles and blogs, along with twitter. They are all over the place. I don't remember seeing as much when Obama was running. You need to get outside your bubble. I even posted the twitter link for those who want to kill him. There is a reason he carries a gun and wears a bullet proof vest. Lots of crazy people out there. Leftists are losing their mind lately. Talking about moving to Canada, etc. Bet you didn't even click on the link from twitter.

http://www.infowars.com/kill-donald-trum...t-threats/

On top of that if there were a bunch of right wingers talking about killing people, the left would have a conniption fit, and be all over it on how they are horrible people. So the irony just shows the mental breakdown of the left.

[I_am_not_mafia]

By the way let me just implore you to theorize how we would even go about determining if someone is or isn't a Muslim. Unless you want to turn in to germany, and replace jews with Muslims, there is no civil way that's effective enough to do what Donald Trump wants to accomplish.

Exactly. Muslims are not a race, it's a lifestyle choice. How do you determine whether someone who claims not to be a Muslim is actually telling the truth? Which means greater checks on everyone who isn't a Muslim and further erosion of civil liberties. In other words, moving further towards a fascist state.

And the whole thing about doing it until 'we figure it out'. What on earth is that supposed to mean? Figure what out? Shouldn't a candidate for presidency already have a good idea of what's going on? If not him then definitely all the experts that are already employed by the intelligence agencies. It's basically another way of saying 'indefinitely' but without actually admitting so.

[I_am_not_mafia]

The idea that liberals don't own guns is hogwash, too.

So liberals can be gun nuts and ammosexuals too?

False dichotomy.

[Wyrd of Gawd]

By the way let me just implore you to theorize how we would even go about determining if someone is or isn't a Muslim. Unless you want to turn in to germany, and replace jews with Muslims, there is no civil way that's effective enough to do what Donald Trump wants to accomplish.

Exactly. Muslims are not a race, it's a lifestyle choice. How do you determine whether someone who claims not to be a Muslim is actually telling the truth? Which means greater checks on everyone who isn't a Muslim and further erosion of civil liberties. In other words, moving further towards a fascist state.

And the whole thing about doing it until 'we figure it out'. What on earth is that supposed to mean? Figure what out? Shouldn't a candidate for presidency already have a good idea of what's going on? If not him then definitely all the experts that are already employed by the intelligence agencies. It's basically another way of saying 'indefinitely' but without actually admitting so.

It's fairly easy to determine who is a muslim.  It's messy but it will detect about 99% and take about 20 seconds per person.

[scoobysnack]

Look at the EU, it's practically on the verge of collapse due to the Muslim migrant invasion. Mathilda, since you live in the UK, what have you experienced, or what is your opinion on the migrants coming in the thousands. I've heard horror stories of massive amounts of rapes, robbery, abusing the welfare system, Muslim no go zones where they are implementing their own form of sharia law, the list goes on.

http://www.politico.eu/article/eu-migrat...l-tension/

I mean I understand the idea of helping people in need and it's honorable especially the women, young children, but seems there is a lot military aged men coming in as well, which are the ones causing the problems.

Then there is the muslim imam who tells the migrants to convert europeans, have children with them, and take over their countries for Islam.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5e8PCKVVxcE

This is an interesting video how muslims will soon outbreed native europeans and take over the continent:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYU

[Thumpalumpacus]

Well here's a link

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-congres...ton-023214

And I chose my words wisely. I said: I've seen more death threats towards Trump from leftists than I've ever seen against anyone.

I'm not seeing how that supports your point at all. It's saying that Obama has the same level of threat that other presidents have had, but it says nothing at all about Trump.

I asked you for hard numbers. Why are you dodging?

All that means is what i've seen, not all that exists.

Yes -- as I said, comfirmation bias on your part. Thanks for the admission.

Look in the comment sections in countless articles and blogs, along with twitter.

No, I asked you for hard numbers, not for an invitation to do your research for you. You either have numbers, or you're talking out of your aass.

They are all over the place. I don't remember seeing as much when Obama was running. You need to get outside your bubble. I even posted the twitter link for those who want to kill him. There is a reason he carries a gun and wears a bullet proof vest. Lots of crazy people out there. Leftists are losing their mind lately. Talking about moving to Canada, etc. Bet you didn't even click on the link from twitter.

I did, and that's exactly why I think you're full of shit.

http://www.infowars.com/kill-donald-trum...t-threats/

Still waiting on your comparative numbers. You made a specific claim. You will either back it up with data, or shut up.

On top of that if there were a bunch of right wingers talking about killing people, the left would have a conniption fit, and be all over it on how they are horrible people. So the irony just shows the mental breakdown of the left.

You're still dodging the question, this time by playing an unsupported tu quoque.

You're expected to use solid thinking and solid data. If you cannot do so, you should probably stop blathering about bullshit you're imagining.

That which is advanced without support can be discarded without support.

You will either support your claim, or suffer this sort of response each and every time you wish to bloviate. Quit dodging the question, and support your claim that Trump is subject to more death threats than others.

[scoobysnack]

The secret service doesn't report the numbers so there is no data to give you. Look at how many people hate Donald Trump, compared to others, and I think it's a safe assumption he's in the lead, but I can't prove it, so i'll give you a win for this one, but only because I don't have time to count them up. How about you gather some numbers to prove your point?

And really asking me to prove the number of death threats against everyone is a bull shit request, because that's impossible. It's like as asking to prove shit doesn't stink. You may think your shit doesn't stink, but I bet if you asked your mom who changed your diapers, she would tell you otherwise.

[I_am_not_mafia]

Exactly. Muslims are not a race, it's a lifestyle choice. How do you determine whether someone who claims not to be a Muslim is actually telling the truth? Which means greater checks on everyone who isn't a Muslim and further erosion of civil liberties. In other words, moving further towards a fascist state.

And the whole thing about doing it until 'we figure it out'. What on earth is that supposed to mean? Figure what out? Shouldn't a candidate for presidency already have a good idea of what's going on? If not him then definitely all the experts that are already employed by the intelligence agencies. It's basically another way of saying 'indefinitely' but without actually admitting so.

It's fairly easy to determine who is a muslim.  It's messy but it will detect about 99% and take about 20 seconds per person.

How?

And checking for circumcision won't help.