Posts: 5356
Threads: 178
Joined: June 28, 2015
Reputation:
35
Why 'Women's Sports' is sexist
March 9, 2016 at 6:41 am
The same reason why 'Black people sports' would be considered racist. We don't see black people and white people sports because it's racist but why do we have seperate sports for men and women? Do people not realize it is sexist?
Like in MMA,UFC there is women's belts and men's belts, why don't people realize this is sexist?
Women should be able to compete with men, there should be no ' Women's Sports' or ' men's sports'.
Just sayin', thought for the day
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation:
111
RE: Why 'Women's Sports' is sexist
March 9, 2016 at 6:59 am
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2016 at 7:02 am by ignoramus.)
So you are presupposing that women are identical to men in terms of stamina and strength, are you?
Hey Vorls? Would you be interested in a bit of real man's rugby?
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Why 'Women's Sports' is sexist
March 9, 2016 at 7:04 am
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2016 at 7:04 am by Alex K.)
It's difficult to establish objective criteria what should be allowed etc. for something that is pointless to begin with
Since pro sport serves no purpose except entertainment, the rules are bound to be arbitrary.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 5356
Threads: 178
Joined: June 28, 2015
Reputation:
35
RE: Why 'Women's Sports' is sexist
March 9, 2016 at 7:06 am
(March 9, 2016 at 7:04 am)Alex K Wrote: It's difficult to establish objective criteria what should be allowed etc. for something that is pointless to begin with
Since pro sport serves no purpose except entertainment, the rules are bound to be arbitrary. So you would be okay with 'Black men & women sport' or ' white men & women sport' and wouldn't consider it racist? O.O
Posts: 5356
Threads: 178
Joined: June 28, 2015
Reputation:
35
RE: Why 'Women's Sports' is sexist
March 9, 2016 at 7:07 am
(March 9, 2016 at 6:59 am)ignoramus Wrote: So you are presupposing that women are identical to men in terms of stamina and strength, are you?
Hey Vorls? Would you be interested in a bit of real man's rugby?
Are you implying women are inferior to men?
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Why 'Women's Sports' is sexist
March 9, 2016 at 7:11 am
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2016 at 7:12 am by Alex K.)
(March 9, 2016 at 7:06 am)pool the great Wrote: (March 9, 2016 at 7:04 am)Alex K Wrote: It's difficult to establish objective criteria what should be allowed etc. for something that is pointless to begin with
Since pro sport serves no purpose except entertainment, the rules are bound to be arbitrary. So you would be okay with 'Black men & women sport' or ' white men & women sport' and wouldn't consider it racist? O.O
If black men showed a systematic advantage in strength over white men, it would make sense to have separate classes in tournaments at some point. The reason is entirely pragmatic, namely to render the results less boring. People can do whatever they want, I won't watch it either way. Just doing arbitrarily without any underlying reason would seem racist though.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 5356
Threads: 178
Joined: June 28, 2015
Reputation:
35
RE: Why 'Women's Sports' is sexist
March 9, 2016 at 7:16 am
(March 9, 2016 at 7:11 am)Alex K Wrote: (March 9, 2016 at 7:06 am)pool the great Wrote: So you would be okay with 'Black men & women sport' or ' white men & women sport' and wouldn't consider it racist? O.O
If black men showed a systematic advantage in strength over white men, it would make sense to have separate classes in tournaments at some point. The reason is entirely pragmatic, namely to render the results less boring. People can do whatever they want, I won't watch it either way.
Woah Woah Woah, so according to you women are inferior to men in some aspects ?!
You do realize that makes you sexist, right?
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Why 'Women's Sports' is sexist
March 9, 2016 at 7:18 am
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2016 at 7:20 am by Alex K.)
(March 9, 2016 at 7:16 am)pool the great Wrote: Woah Woah Woah, so according to you women are inferior to men in some aspects ?!
You do realize that makes you sexist, right?
Only when using a pointless definition of sexism. By the same lines, I would be sexist for saying that men can't bear children.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dgp9MPLEAqA
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation:
111
RE: Why 'Women's Sports' is sexist
March 9, 2016 at 7:19 am
Pooley, you seen NBL lately? It's spot the white dude! I dare say half the fans are white.
It's big business, so whoever get's the results get to play. And the fans want wins! No-one really gives 2 shits about colour, race, etc.
Are you making trouble again? Is that the sound of one hand fapping? hehe
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Posts: 5356
Threads: 178
Joined: June 28, 2015
Reputation:
35
RE: Why 'Women's Sports' is sexist
March 9, 2016 at 7:21 am
(March 9, 2016 at 7:18 am)Alex K Wrote: (March 9, 2016 at 7:16 am)pool the great Wrote: Woah Woah Woah, so according to you women are inferior to men in some aspects ?!
You do realize that makes you sexist, right?
Only when using a pointless definition of sexism. By the same lines, I would be sexist for saying that men can't bear children. That depends.
Do you think men are inferior to women?
And what about this ' pointless definition of sexism'?
You think it's sexist to say men are smarter than women but not sexist to say women are weaker than men? Double standard or just indoctrination?
|