Transexuals

[KevinM1]

Drich, you do realize that transsexuals aren't asking for a new law to be written that allows them to enter the bathroom of their choice, right? But rather that the NC state legislature wrote a new law prohibiting them from doing, until now, what they wanted since, well, forever? And that your points 1-4 are moot because what you think is happening isn't actually happening?

Also, as a point of order, your first link is utterly irrelevant given Canada isn't the US.

[robvalue]

Drich, you do realize that transsexuals aren't asking for a new law to be written that allows them to enter the bathroom of their choice, right?

Hmm, pretty sure I covered this in my video as well! Are some people still not clear on this

After all these fucking pages?

God! I'll post my video again on this in case anyone is still unclear.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWyj-EcDkNY

[I_am_not_mafia]

Drich: me! me! me! me!
Everyone else: You're wrong
Drich: me! me! me! me!
Everyone else: No. As we said ...
Drich: me! me! me! me!
Everyone else: What's for dinner tonight?
Drich: me! me! me! me!

[I_am_not_mafia]

Do you want a 30 year old mentally ill man potentially in the bathroom with your little daughter for ANY Reason?

I hope you don't go in any bathrooms with anyone's son or daughter considering that you suffer the mental disorder of being a sociopath. That's far more dangerous.

[Jackalope]

Do you want a 30 year old mentally ill man potentially in the bathroom with your little daughter for ANY Reason?

I don't want you running around without adult supervision, think I'll call my senator and see what he can do.

[Brian37]

Seems to me that any objections to transsexuals using the bathrooms they identify with would be supported by actual data highlighting what a menace to public safety such a practice has resulted in.  The dearth of such data speaks volumes.

Drippy and people of his ilk love to harp on "Why should we support/allow such a low percentage of the population to have special treatment?" not realizing that such a mindset is anathema to our society on the whole.  Might as well complain about wheelchair ramps, or brail.  And, of course, transsexuals aren't asking for special treatment, but to be allowed to continue receiving equal treatment.

Legislation is written to solve a perceived problem, but there's no actual problem here outside of fear.  Why?  Because if transsexuals in bathrooms was a legitimate problem we would be acutely aware of it by now.  No, this is just religious idiots fearing what they think is icky and trying to make everyone else comply with their discomfort.  Fuck that and fuck them.

Where is anything that i have said can you extrapolate this? I said keep mentally ill men and men who want to exploit a loop hole in the law out of the womens bathroom.

I only pointed to the 1%ers to identify that the majority of the 1% go completely untreated meaning they are mentally ill by the very definition of the word and we are allowing to circumvent due process of how laws are generally made so that they may force legitimacy and acceptance of their unregulated mental illness, and you morons line up like lemmings, no matter who may be endangered. Which brings us to the real concern. Sexual preaditors who would have no issue putting on a dress and wait in ambush to attack unsuspecting women.

We already have couple a dozen examples of sex predators putting on dresses to take advantage of this law.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/sexual...to-assault

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/...-children/


http://komonews.com/archive/police-man-i...s-bathroom

Now before you go running off chasing your tail let review what my points actually are:
1) At best 1% of the population will benfit from this law as it is intended.
2) of those 1%ers the majority go untreated for mental illness.
3) This laws put 1/2 if not more of the population in a state of undress potentially with a mentally ill man, or a sexual predator wearing a dress.
4)mentally ill people should not be making policy that endangers the population just because they want to legitmise their delusions.

You're quoting Breitfuck, a right wing rag...... Yea, that's neutral and objective.

[Brian37]

Do you want a 30 year old mentally ill man potentially in the bathroom with your little daughter for ANY Reason?

I don't want you running around without adult supervision, think I'll call my senator and see what he can do.

Agreed. I love how these morons object to big government but want to use it to spy on peoples wee wees.

[TheRocketSurgeon]

Why's it always about the daughters?

Are the boys in the men's room, where the predators can already go, not in danger just as much? (Pedophiles care more about the age/innocence of the victims than they do about the gender.)

And "taking advantage of" what law? As someone already pointed out, the only laws in discussion here are ones being made against transexuals, who have never been shown to be a danger, themselves. The thin excuse that accommodating the rights of the minority will endanger us all (or the kids, man, the kiiids!) is ludicrous in the extreme, even if there are a few predators who take advantage. I just can't see any major difference between these anti-trans arguments and the Klan arguments of the 1960s, when miscegenation was no longer being outlawed, that black men would be more likely to rape "our" daughters.

If you were here, doing exactly what you're doing by citing to a few rare cases, as an argument against toleration of race-mixing, in the claim that if we let black men date white women, it would mean endangering our daughters, we'd call you a racist fuckwad. After all, allowing race-mixing DOES allow a few actual predators to operate more freely. That has nothing to do with the rights of black men and women in this country, or whether or not we should accommodate them.

But that's almost exactly what you're doing, here. You're creating a bogeyman out of straws that you must reach surprisingly far to grasp at. Just say what you mean: the Christian culture has taught you that there's something wrong with people who are transgender, and you wish to make sure things conform to your religious-cultural expectations of the world instead of recognizing their basic humanity.

[Whateverist]

More than a 130 fucking pages on transexuals?! My gawd but some people are just obsessed with sex and bathrooms. A Drich thread I see. Ho hum, too predictable. I don't even have to read a word to know what he would be ragging on about. Dreary.

[I_am_not_mafia]

This Alabama City Will Now Put Transgender People In Jail For Peeing At Target

On Tuesday night, the City Council of Oxford, Alabama unanimously approved a new ordinance that will punish individuals for using restrooms that do not match their biological sex as stated on their birth certificate. The policy is a direct response to Target indicating that trans people are welcome and will be respected in their stores.

Anywhere within the city’s police jurisdiction, it is now a criminal offense for transgender people to use restrooms that match their gender identity unless they have undergone surgery and successfully changed the gender marker on their birth certificate.

Each individual violation will result in a $500 fine or up to six months in jail. CNN reported this week that “most people urinate four to seven times during a day.”

The ordinance is actually more expansive than North Carolina’s HB2, which only applies to government buildings and public schools and universities.

In a prepared statement after the ordinance’s passage, Council President Steven Waits said that the council passed it “not out of concerns for the 0.3 percent of the population who identify as transgender,” but “to protect our women and children,” according to the Anniston Star.