Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 28, 2024, 7:18 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
In Case Anyone Has Forgotten
#11
RE: In Case Anyone Has Forgotten
(June 5, 2016 at 9:47 pm)dyresand Wrote:
(June 5, 2016 at 12:18 am)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: Maybe he's running to lower the age of consent to 7, like it was in 1895 Delaware?

Are... you... kidding me.....?
Don't you know American history?  They got real conservative and increased it to 7 years of age.  Before they set that minimum limit there wasn't one.  That's one reason the slavers wanted to own slaves.  

"In the United States in the 1890s, several states had an age of consent as low as 10. In 1895, the age of consent in Delaware was 7, according to an article in The New York Times."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent_reform

You can see the original article in the NYTimes archives but you have to be subscriber to read it. Wiki has a scan of the original article.

This is a transcript used by Wikipedia = https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_New_Y...ress_Meets

"He declared, further, that this society had urgent need to pronounce itself on the subject of the so-called age of consent laws. Girls are deemed capable of controlling property only at their majority, but States decide not so with their persons. In four States the age of consent is fixed at the shockingly low age of ten years, in four others at twelve, in three at thirteen, and so on, increasing, except in Delaware, where the original statute pertaining to the crime of rape is still unrepealed, fixing the age at seven years. These so-called age of consent statutes, which discriminate against girlhood and favor immoral men, are a disgrace to the several States of the Union."
Reply
#12
RE: In Case Anyone Has Forgotten
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/06/infamous...the-party/

Quote:Infamous Libertarian stripper says ‘free expression’ got him banned from the party

Quote:He was taken off stage after stripping to his underwear as the audience booed. Weeks, who said he did it “on a dare,” lost in his attempt to defeat party chair Nicholas Sarwark’s re-election bid.

According to Livingston Daily, Weeks is not only his party’s local leader, but is also running for Livingston County sheriff.


Yeah... this is what we need.  Samantha Bee did a great two-part bit on the Libertarians.  Bat-shit crazy motherfuckesrs.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Help me out here. Barrett and voting case. Brian37 31 3572 October 30, 2020 at 11:47 am
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  IS There Anyone Who Thinks The WLB Has The Smarts To Deal With This Looming Crisis? Minimalist 2 445 December 24, 2017 at 11:05 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Has anyone here heard about Greg Palast? Won2blv 18 1474 February 10, 2017 at 1:09 pm
Last Post: GUBU
  RE: The positive case for voting Donald Trump for president. Minimalist 200 20608 November 8, 2016 at 4:26 pm
Last Post: GUBU
  The positive case for voting Hillary Clinton for president. Whateverist 113 13922 November 7, 2016 at 11:54 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Actual case of voter fraud Doubting Thomas 10 1555 October 31, 2016 at 6:33 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  In Case You're Wondering Why Minimalist 0 583 April 12, 2016 at 5:01 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Humans need not apply - the case for the universal basic income Heywood 23 7213 January 22, 2015 at 2:10 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The New York Choke Hold Case Heywood 95 11988 December 7, 2014 at 12:11 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  In Case Anyone Forgets What Our Elections Are Really About. Minimalist 10 2269 November 5, 2014 at 8:41 am
Last Post: KUSA



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)