To circumcise or not to circumcise?

[Minimalist]

Rhetorical.

[Catholic_Lady]

I certainly never said that. I think it looks much better circumcised, as I have the right to my own personal preference, but I never said it was "eww dirty" otherwise.

If my personal preference allowed me to go mutilate people willy-nilly, then i'd have mutilated a lot of people by now.

Right, because that's exactly what I was saying. 

[Jello]

If my personal preference allowed me to go mutilate people willy-nilly, then i'd have mutilated a lot of people by now.

Right, because that's exactly what I was saying. 

You have said that mutilating someone (circumcision) is your preference. I made a small exaggeration on that. 


It's weird. You mutilate a child without it's consent, nobody bats an eyelid. Mutilate an adult without their consent, it's suddenly a crime.

[Losty]

Lol you guys are cracking me up.

I think it's a little bit disgusting that you find it so amusing...
I get there can be differing opinions but I do not understand how cutting up a baby's genitals could ever be funny.

[Jello]

Lol you guys are cracking me up.

I think it's a little bit disgusting that you find it so amusing...
I get there can be differing opinions but I do not understand how cutting up a baby's genitals could ever be funny.

This. Could not agree more.

[Losty]

Like I said earlier, a penis is only as clean as the guy it belongs to. I'm not circumcised, I've never had a habit of keeping a dirty dick, naither have any of the guys I've been with (all uncircumcised). It's a matter of getting in the damn shower and thoroughly cleaning yourself with some sensitive-skin soaps (shower gels are a bit strong and not recommended for genitals).

Also by the same token I'm sure there's plenty of circumcised guys who don't wash.

I mean if we are talking about not washing, we should flip baby girl's genitals inside out because if you don't wash those they get nasty too.

[Jello]

Like I said earlier, a penis is only as clean as the guy it belongs to. I'm not circumcised, I've never had a habit of keeping a dirty dick, naither have any of the guys I've been with (all uncircumcised). It's a matter of getting in the damn shower and thoroughly cleaning yourself with some sensitive-skin soaps (shower gels are a bit strong and not recommended for genitals).

Also by the same token I'm sure there's plenty of circumcised guys who don't wash.

I mean if we are talking about not washing, we should flip baby girl's genitals inside out because if you don't wash those they get nasty too.

We're not trying to recreate predator here, yo

[Catholic_Lady]

Right, because that's exactly what I was saying. 

You have said that mutilating someone (circumcision) is your preference. I made a small exaggeration on that. 


It's weird. You mutilate a child without it's consent, nobody bats an eyelid. Mutilate an adult without their consent, it's suddenly a crime.

You made the assertion that everyone on the for side of the discussion is saying uncircumcised penises are "ewwwww dirty." I responded by saying that while I think it looks better circumcised, I don't think the other alternative is "ewwww dirty." 

Yeah, I think it looks better. But as I have explained, it's not like that's the legitimate reason I voted yes up top. You're making it sound like it is.

[Losty]

Lets see... you are wrong here "there is nothing more disgusting than a man who expects me to lick a lollipop with the wrapper still on it", this is a personal opinion and not relevant to anyone but you. If you're not smart enough to slide the skin back I wouldn't want you near my penis, if I had one.

And... "They look dirty", no, wrong again, they don't look dirty unless they are dirty and if so you need to suck cock with a better class of men.

And last but not least... "Comparing male circumcision to female circumcision is like comparing cutting your cuticles to cutting off your finger." Oopsie! Wrong again, there are a dozen types of female genital mutilations ranging from removing the hood of the clitoris to trimming the labia majora and or the labia minora to a complete removal of both including the clitoris and all it's connected organ as well as sewing up the vagina. Not all are a complete mutilation of every sexual sensory receptors but all are still mutilations and so are male circumcisions. They are all unnecessary operations.

It is barbaric to strap a child down and force a it to have an operation on its perfectly healthy normal body parts for a fashion statement.

First it's an opinion then it's a matter of being smart. Really? So you wouldn't want me anywhere near your uncircumcised penis if you had one.  I'd prefer that to a guy who would ask me to push his foreskin back. That's not a matter of smart. That's a matter of I will not do it.

I was not wrong about the kind of female circumcision which does involve mutilation and long term disfigurement of sexual apparatus.  Male circumcision is not mutilation. It does not involve cutting away  something that will leave the man unable to function or experience pleasure.

Because I love you, all I can say is that you really should educate yourself on a topic before speaking about it...

[Jello]

You have said that mutilating someone (circumcision) is your preference. I made a small exaggeration on that. 


It's weird. You mutilate a child without it's consent, nobody bats an eyelid. Mutilate an adult without their consent, it's suddenly a crime.

You made the assertion that everyone on the for side of the discussion is saying uncircumcised penises are "ewwwww dirty." I responded by saying that while I think it looks better circumcised, I don't think the other alternative is "ewwww dirty." 

Yeah, I think it looks better. But as I have explained, it's not like that's the legitimate reason I voted yes up top. You're making it sound like it is.

Then please, actually give us a legitimate reason. I've yet to see one that actually contains any logic, and the fact you're just throwing silly shit around is making you sound awfully troll-ish, or childish, take your pick really.