Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 7:23 pm
| Poll: If you were were having a baby boy tomorrow, would you opt for him to be circumcised? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| Yes, hoes | 11 | 20.00% | |
| Hellz no | 44 | 80.00% | |
| Total | 55 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Thread Rating:
|
To circumcise or not to circumcise?
|
|
Condoms protect against STI's far more effectively than cutting.
And for the record, MH - I'm against slicing into a kid without their consent regardless. When they're old enough to make a cosmetic decision, they can make it. ![]() (June 11, 2016 at 9:04 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote: Condoms protect against STI's far more effectively than cutting. Nor precisely.
"What a little moonlight can do." ~ Billie Holiday
I voted yes, much cleaner look, love my circumcised penis, thanks mom!
RE: To circumcise or not to circumcise?
June 11, 2016 at 9:34 pm
(This post was last modified: June 11, 2016 at 9:35 pm by Athene.)
Despite meticulous hygiene, the skin underneath the foreskin is naturally dark, warm, and often moist; An ideal place for Candida/yeast to thrive. As an oxygen-deprived area, it is particularly susceptible to anaerobic bacteria. Unless one keeps the foreskin retracted at ALL times, microbes will accumulate on the skin underneath the area at a much higher rate than that of the average circumcised penis; Regardless of attention to personal hygiene.
These ongoing assertions that circumcision offers absolutely NO benefit in the way of health/hygiene that can't just as easily be addressed through personal cleanliness are untrue. I'm personally NOT of the opinion that this "benefit" is worth having the procedure done on an infant, as the presence of microbes doesn't always indicate infection and in the event that infection does occur, it can usually be addressed through simple interventions; Even as a result of the body's own defenses. But, facts are facts. Being informed is a two-way street in regards to this issue, as well as being honest. If the goal is to actually encourage parents to reconsider choosing circumcision, it would best be done without glossing over the truth, making unfair comparisons, and resorting to vitriolic attacks and insults. It only serves to make SOME opponents of the procedure appear to be desperate, hyper-emotional and somewhat fanatical. That's isn't the way to change minds. (June 11, 2016 at 9:34 pm)Thena323 Wrote: Despite meticulous hygiene, the skin underneath the foreskin is naturally dark, warm, and often moist; An ideal place for Candida/yeast to thrive. As an oxygen-deprived area, it is particularly susceptible to anaerobic bacteria. Unless one keeps the foreskin retracted at ALL times, microbes will accumulate on the skin underneath the area at a much higher rate than that of the average circumcised penis; Regardless of attention to personal hygiene. FGM also offers health benefits, so? You can argue for almost any procedure having health benefits. RE: To circumcise or not to circumcise?
June 11, 2016 at 9:44 pm
(This post was last modified: June 11, 2016 at 9:56 pm by Athene.)
"Adulthood is like looking both ways before you cross the road, and then getting hit by an airplane" - sarcasm_only
"Ironically like the nativist far-Right, which despises multiculturalism, but benefits from its ideas of difference to scapegoat the other and to promote its own white identity politics; these postmodernists, leftists, feminists and liberals also use multiculturalism, to side with the oppressor, by demanding respect and tolerance for oppression characterised as 'difference', no matter how intolerable." - Maryam Namazie RE: To circumcise or not to circumcise?
June 11, 2016 at 9:49 pm
(This post was last modified: June 11, 2016 at 9:57 pm by Homeless Nutter.)
(June 11, 2016 at 9:12 pm)Mr.wizard Wrote: I voted yes, much cleaner look [...] Really - that's an argument? "Cleaner look"? Pray tell - how does one measure the "cleanliness" of a look of a penis? Because it sounds like an arbitrary value judgement to me - the kind of rationalization someone would make up, if they wanted to justify a preconceived notion, with no actual facts available. Personally - I think cut d*ck looks sad, ugly, unnatural, and dirty - not only because people, who had it done seem to think, that they don't have to wash it now, but also because the head scrapes against dirty underwear all the time... But hey - whatever helps you sleep at night, without the urge to punch your mom in the mouth for mutilating your body ...
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Do not dumb here. Not a dumb area. | no one | 16 | 4626 |
June 5, 2020 at 9:25 pm Last Post: Little lunch |
|
| Deffo kinda chicken, but not chicken enough not to ever... | c172 | 17 | 7965 |
August 16, 2016 at 7:55 am Last Post: Edwardo Piet |
|
| Not coming out, but not hiding it anymore | Fruity | 36 | 16862 |
June 24, 2013 at 7:11 am Last Post: Rahul |
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)



![[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i1140.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fn569%2Fthesummerqueen%2FUntitled2_zpswaosccbr.png)

