Posts: 67287
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: dino bones
August 16, 2016 at 3:53 pm
(This post was last modified: August 16, 2016 at 3:54 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
No, no no no. See, this is the disconnect between believers and non-believers. That wasn't an argument, it was a reaffirmation of faith. 
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 3637
Threads: 20
Joined: July 20, 2011
Reputation:
47
RE: dino bones
August 16, 2016 at 4:00 pm
(August 16, 2016 at 11:58 am)mersag Wrote: soft tissue in dinosaur bones is a problem for evolutionist.
It's absolute proof dinosaurs are no way as old as they first thought.
Science has failed us and the science books should be rewritten.
How sad is it that your religious indoctrination has completely destroyed you natural sense of curiosity?
Just a few minutes of research would have shown how wrong your creationist claim is.
How does it feel to be so willfully ignorant?
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Posts: 1633
Threads: 33
Joined: March 14, 2016
Reputation:
23
RE: dino bones
August 16, 2016 at 4:58 pm
(This post was last modified: August 16, 2016 at 5:00 pm by RozKek.)
I find it fucking hilarious that someone think they can debunk decades of science with their mere brain.
Edit: decades, not centuries .-.
Posts: 28409
Threads: 524
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: dino bones
August 16, 2016 at 5:01 pm
This might be "theBorg"s kid.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 5466
Threads: 36
Joined: November 10, 2014
Reputation:
53
RE: dino bones
August 16, 2016 at 5:02 pm
(August 16, 2016 at 11:58 am)mersag Wrote: soft tissue in dinosaur bones is a problem for evolutionist.
It's absolute proof dinosaurs are no way as old as they first thought.
Science has failed us and the science books should be rewritten.
Cool haiku, bro.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: dino bones
August 16, 2016 at 5:12 pm
(August 16, 2016 at 11:58 am)mersag Wrote: soft tissue in dinosaur bones is a problem for evolutionist.
It's absolute proof dinosaurs are no way as old as they first thought.
Science has failed us and the science books should be rewritten.
Your intelligence indicated you were not created by any God who is benevolent towards you. So the bible has failed us and religious books should be rewritten.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: dino bones
August 16, 2016 at 5:45 pm
This is an example of the creationist rumour mill in action. It's a positive-feedback loop - everything in it simply goes round and round, with absolutely zero capacity for fact checking. It's what they call "creation research", in the truest sense of the word Orwellian.
They need more fibre in their facts; maybe this shit wouldn't keep bobbing to the surface all the fucking time.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 3637
Threads: 20
Joined: July 20, 2011
Reputation:
47
RE: dino bones
August 16, 2016 at 7:56 pm
So, the OP is chess playing pigeon, right?
He came here, knocked over all the pieces, crapped on the chess board, and flew back to his flock and claimed victory.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Posts: 35336
Threads: 205
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation:
146
RE: dino bones
August 16, 2016 at 7:59 pm
(August 16, 2016 at 11:58 am)mersag Wrote: soft tissue in dinosaur bones is a problem for evolutionist.
It's absolute proof dinosaurs are no way as old as they first thought.
Science has failed us and the science books should be rewritten.
It's already been explained by evolutionary biologists.
It's time for the pseudo-science of creationism to be abandoned and for creationists to educate themselves about evolutionary facts.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: dino bones
August 16, 2016 at 8:16 pm
*Pssst*
Hey, OP...
Try the one about living snails carbon-dated as being 27,000 years old...
Or the Paluxy River tracks...
C'mon, mix it up a bit.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
|
