Matt Dilahunty On The Logical Absolutes

[Edwardo Piet]

I think I explained this quite well

[...] I'm not talking about the mentioning of the symbols "A=A" I'm talking about what it represents. What it represents exists without the symbol. Something is something regardless if those words exist. You can't pretend that everything isn't what it is if we don't have labels for it. A thing is a thing regardless of if we can say "a thing is a thing".

[...] Again, you don't need a symbol to represent something for that something that the symbol represents to be a reality.