Posts: 44047
Threads: 529
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 21, 2016 at 7:31 pm
Joker, what is it that you think evolution is ? You seem to enjoy railing against a parody of it, but what do you think evolution actually is?
Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 3541
Threads: 0
Joined: January 20, 2015
Reputation:
35
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 21, 2016 at 7:39 pm
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2016 at 7:40 pm by Homeless Nutter.)
(November 21, 2016 at 6:33 pm)The Joker Wrote: Folks I am not falling for evolution, I just don’t take it seriously. [...]
Oh, really? Well, if evolution is false, then how come your mother is a monkey? Check mate, theists...
(nailed it!)
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 21, 2016 at 7:44 pm
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2016 at 7:57 pm by Cyberman.)
Even assuming the OP isn't a troll, this thread just exposes the binary thinking endemic to the fundie mindset. Even if evolution was completely demolished tomorrow, it would still in no way mean that religion wins by default; no matter how warm and fluffy it makes you feel. The religionist would still have all their work in front of them.
The problem, as I said elsewhere, is that the creationist dogma mill has no system for trapping and correcting errors; meaning that a lie once told gets bounced around and amplified, becoming one of Richard Dawkins' Unsinkable Rubber Ducks (aka PRATT arguments). And make no mistake, Joker, these people have a vested interest in lying to you. Stop being so gullible, for your own sake.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 30833
Threads: 1382
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
152
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 21, 2016 at 7:45 pm
Evolution disagrees with the OP.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Posts: 5664
Threads: 219
Joined: June 20, 2016
Reputation:
61
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 21, 2016 at 7:57 pm
I wonder what "scientist" taught joker biology? Ken Ham? LOL!
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
Posts: 2292
Threads: 16
Joined: September 28, 2015
Reputation:
24
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 21, 2016 at 7:59 pm
Clown college, duh.
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation:
151
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 21, 2016 at 8:33 pm
(November 21, 2016 at 7:44 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Even assuming the OP isn't a troll, this thread just exposes the binary thinking endemic to the fundie mindset. Even if evolution was completely demolished tomorrow, it would still in no way mean that religion wins by default; no matter how warm and fluffy it makes you feel. The religionist would still have all their work in front of them.
The problem, as I said elsewhere, is that the creationist dogma mill has no system for trapping and correcting errors; meaning that a lie once told gets bounced around and amplified, becoming one of Richard Dawkins' Unsinkable Rubber Ducks (aka PRATT arguments). And make no mistake, Joker, these people have a vested interest in lying to you. Stop being so gullible, for your own sake.
Or like that other new member Theological who I respect much more than this joker. I ask to have a conversation with him but I swear he is convinced that that means parroting tired, retread arguments we've all heard and dismissed any number of times. It is anti-intellectual to the point of being numbing.
Posts: 4940
Threads: 99
Joined: April 17, 2011
Reputation:
45
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 21, 2016 at 8:39 pm
(November 21, 2016 at 6:33 pm)The Joker Wrote: Folks I am not falling for evolution, I just don’t take it seriously. Science doesn't care if you believe in it or not.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Posts: 7140
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation:
72
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 21, 2016 at 8:43 pm
(November 21, 2016 at 6:33 pm)The Joker Wrote: Neither creation nor evolution is directly observable, testable, repeatable, or falsifiable.
Well, you're half-right.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
Posts: 19881
Threads: 324
Joined: July 31, 2016
Reputation:
34
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 21, 2016 at 8:54 pm
We created dogs like the Chihuahua and the Great Pyrenees who can no longer reproduce together*, making them functionally separate species. Humans did this, no god needed.
*Picture mating a Smart car and semi-trailer truck.
|