Heated debate on evolution with brother

[Pat Mustard]

You lose.  


Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

I lose what, your respect? Ain't worth shit child.
Your subjective jugdementvof who's correct? Well your subjective judgement goes against conclusive evidence so you're wong, child.

---

It appears that somebody, either him or you has been sold some bad information.  You, of course, instantly assume that it is him who is wrong even though he is near genius in so many areas.
Look closely at what you are assuming is true, find a few good examples, and then ask him what his thoughts are about those.  Like, find a couple of fossil examples of one species evolving into a different species.  He has already admitted that micro evolution is real, so don't bother with changes within the same species, find some inter species changes to discuss with him.
At all costs, stay away from the name calling or you will have instantly lost any argument.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Snowtracks "near genius", something does not smell right here.

Yeah, one of my first thoughts on reading mikes miles first post was, "this is awful sockpuppety behaviour".

[Crossless2.0]

You lose.  


Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

I lose what, your respect? Ain't worth shit child.
Your subjective jugdementvof who's correct? Well your subjective judgement goes against conclusive evidence so you're wong, child.

---

Snowtracks "near genius", something does not smell right here.

Yeah, one of my first thoughts on reading mikes miles first post was, "this is awful sockpuppety behaviour".

In fairness, Snowtracks is near genius . . . close enough to almost glimpse it with the Hubble.

[Jehanne]

A picture is worth a thousand words (well, at least sometimes):

[snowtracks]

[Pat Mustard]

[SnowLucario]

Evolution is proven, and we have the evidence to back it up. The same is not true of your sky daddy.

[Mister Agenda]

The 'Cambrian Explosion' lasted over 20 million years. Geologists have a different notion of what kind of timeline constitutes an 'explosion' than most folks. And in Darwin's time it was thought to have lasted only a few million years. The available evidence has come a long way in the last 35 years or so. Dwelling on what Darwin knew over 150 years ago is quaint, like citing Thomas Newcomen as an authority in a dispute over a matter of interest concerning modern mechanical engineering. We've progressed a bit since he invented the 'atmospheric engine' in 1712.

[Neo-Scholastic]

Give a few million years to the cat ladies (or gene-editing be accessible), and even human babies might start to look like cats.

[Jehanne]

[DarkerEnergy]