Creationism

[Rokcet Scientist]

Ah, but they have fun with it and their commandments beat up on the bibble's.

Absolutely!

But I prefer the fun without the Hall'oween mumbo jumbo.

In fact, the less costume the better.

[fr0d0]

We did have a couple of Satanists. They faded into the woodwork..

[Epimethean]

Too bad. Readers of LaVey have great fun with the non-secular.

[frankiej]

Anton LaVey is a an awesomely cool guy

[Epimethean]

He was quite a personality. He lived here for a time. I liked the way he deconstructed religion and put it back together to suit his senses. Since religion tends to be whatever its adherents want it to be, at least he was honest about making it pragmatic.

[frankiej]

He also had a cool beard

[Epimethean]

I grow one like that each winter.

[downbeatplumb]

[quote='Liu Bei mixed with Leondias' pid='181052'

For one you show clear lack of understanding. For one even if I had a "picture of God" it would be useless since god incorperal. Pictures aren't direct and you haven't even considered that maybe reality isn't as material as you think! Heck, It could be completely immaterial. (to downbeatplumb)Technically speaking, the arguement isn't how the eye developed it is how irreducably complex systems form and what purpose did the system form before it was its current function. (to Rhythm) The probablity of just sustaining life is low let alone maintaining it.
[/quote]

Oh for fucks sake what irreducible systems would they be?
would they be the same irreducible systems that were shown to have evolved in he normal way? are we talking the flagellum here.

http://www.millerandlevine.com/km/evol/d...ticle.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_HVrjKcvrU