Tom Perez is the new DNC chair.

[Autumnlicious]

Nail them all to a cross for getting Hillary elected through dishonesty, and then not even figuring how how to get her to win against Trump. Then on top of that they show they haven't learned a damn thing.

I always see people claiming dishonesty but then how do you explain the votes in the primary? The rules were well known ahead of time and most of the superdelegates were installed by Obama, the same guy the bulk of the party voted in for Hope and Change.

How'd that work out? You got exactly what you wanted - out with the prior DNC, in with Obama's DNC.

But let's move on and focus on the people voting during the primary.

How do you explain the hugely influential Black vote favoring Clinton?

Put up or shut up.

You're the reason why we will lose. Nothing is ever good enough, the world (and DNC) is against you and you're too busy to join the DNC to push for change.

If you were my customer, I would fire you. You cost more than your flesh would ever be worth.

That's the true worth of a traitor - someone who gives aid to the enemy. Doesn't matter if it's because you're on a tear or angry, fact of the matter is we will all lose because of what you represent.

Unbridled bitterness and undeserved entitlement. Just like President Trump. It's not yours until you make it yours.

But apparently the first time you put skin in the game is your last. Whiney Little Bitch.

[Minimalist]

I always see people claiming dishonesty but then how do you explain the votes in the primary? The rules were well known ahead of time and most of the superdelegates were installed by Obama, the same guy the bulk of the party voted in for Hope and Change.

?

Superdelegates have been a fixture of the Democratic Party since 1984, and they had been studying the idea since Hubert Humphrey in 1968 before implementing it.

[Amarok]

With this it seems the DNC is committed to a losing strategy. It's a bad sign that they refused to put a progressive in charge, despite being on a losing streak in the midterm and presidential elections. 

It wasn't too long ago that I started actually paying attention to politics, and realized republicans aren't for me, and switched to democratic. Now I can't even call myself a democrat because of the way they've been handling things. Unity my ass. They repeatedly screw over their base, then scream for unity right afterwards. They deserve the shit they've been getting at town halls.

Meh progressives are really either communists in disguise or useful idiots of ideological subversion. I went through that phase in my life and when you rise up the ranks you find out it's really left hand path Jacobins deceiving their underlings. Most of it's occult, and hidden only until you are initiated. This is why most leftists say everyone that disagrees with them is stupid, because they are in the cult at their level and don't know any better. Even higher levels know this, but most on the right don't understand this, or the morons on the low level left. We have a communist party here in wisconsin, and when you look into it, they pretend they are progressives, but only to hide their true ideology of Marxism. It's really just a front group. It's a major reason I left the left. They intentionally deceive their followers. When I tried to expose it to my fellow lefties they didn't want to hear it. So I left that cult.

Here's a magazine you lefties would like:

https://www.jacobinmag.com/

You will soon meet your demise. Everyone that wakes up rejects it.

Scooby you really need to get that tin foil hat adjusted

[The Industrial Atheist]

Lol Alex Jones who thinks Obama is literally a demon. If it's good enough for Trump, it's good enough for the Trumpeteers.

Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk

[Chad32]

Nail them all to a cross for getting Hillary elected through dishonesty, and then not even figuring how how to get her to win against Trump. Then on top of that they show they haven't learned a damn thing.

I always see people claiming dishonesty but then how do you explain the votes in the primary? The rules were well known ahead of time and most of the superdelegates were installed by Obama, the same guy the bulk of the party voted in for Hope and Change.

How'd that work out? You got exactly what you wanted - out with the prior DNC, in with Obama's DNC.

But let's move on and focus on the people voting during the primary.

How do you explain the hugely influential Black vote favoring Clinton?

Put up or shut up.

You're the reason why we will lose. Nothing is ever good enough, the world (and DNC) is against you and you're too busy to join the DNC to push for change.

If you were my customer, I would fire you. You cost more than your flesh would ever be worth.

That's the true worth of a traitor - someone who gives aid to the enemy. Doesn't matter if it's because you're on a tear or angry, fact of the matter is we will all lose because of what you represent.

Unbridled bitterness and undeserved entitlement. Just like President Trump. It's not yours until you make it yours.

But apparently the first time you put skin in the game is your last. Whiney Little Bitch.

We know for a fact that there was dishonesty in the DNC, due to wikileaks. It's not just me whining. It's a fact. They fought against Bernie from day 1. It's not enough to vote for someone because the other guy is worse. Give us someone who we like. Not someone we dislike less than the other guy. I shouldn't need to explain why blacks voted for Clinton. She's not supported by white supremacists.

The dNC is not going to change if we keep voting for the candidates they put up. Why should they?

[The Industrial Atheist]

I always see people claiming dishonesty but then how do you explain the votes in the primary? The rules were well known ahead of time and most of the superdelegates were installed by Obama, the same guy the bulk of the party voted in for Hope and Change.

?

Superdelegates have been a fixture of the Democratic Party since 1984, and they had been studying the idea since Hubert Humphrey in 1968 before implementing it.

What happened with the Superdelegates was they already declared for Hillary before any voting was done. So there may have been certain people who voted for Hillary because, look she's already got all these votes?

Then you had Donna Brazille helping Hillary cheat in the debates, the DNC trying to atheist shame Bernie (which I don't know if he really is, but just being associated with athiests can be politically toxic)
Then you had Wasserman-schultz emailing msnbc's higher up's that negative coverage must stop.

It was a screw job from day 1.

Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk

[Autumnlicious]

Sanders was never a democrat, shitheads.

Is that so hard to figure? Do you honestly think you can just one day waltz in, declare yourself a Democrat and get full party support? The fuck are you smoking!?

Also, the "atheist!" email can be publicly examined - it was never followed up on. So prove it was "used" in the nefarious manner you speak of.

Both of you are shitheads.

Double shithead on you Chad - it is precisely that rhetoric that brought us Trump.

"But her emails!!!1"

Yeah, now we get to lose the next 20 years of the Supreme Court, subhuman. Thanks a lot.

[dyresand]

Nail them all to a cross for getting Hillary elected through dishonesty, and then not even figuring how how to get her to win against Trump. Then on top of that they show they haven't learned a damn thing.

How do you explain the hugely influential Black vote favoring Clinton?

To counter popular belief not a lot of black people actually like HRC or voted for her.
And i the voting area i was at there was mostly black Trump and Johnson supporters and a few Jill Stein  here and there.

in all honestly it didn't help that Clinton was race baiting for votes for even the hot sauce fiasco. 
Not to mention looking back you see her with that 3am ad with Obama and calling black youths super predators there is other times
she was caught being out  right racist.

[GUBU]

Well take the bitch out and nail her to a cross!  Really, listen to yourself.

---

That will ensure that you get input into the nominating process.

Nail them all to a cross for getting Hillary elected through dishonesty, and then not even figuring how how to get her to win against Trump. Then on top of that they show they haven't learned a damn thing.

Do I have to remind people that we have SCROTUS Drumpfuck, not because Hilary was a bad candidate, but because the Republitraitors finally figured out how many US citizens they needed to unperson?

Because all this "Hilary couldn't beat Drumpfuck" whining is getting old, fast.

[The Industrial Atheist]

Hillary Clinton had a %37 trustworthy rating. She was not a good candidate.