Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 18, 2024, 3:30 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
#91
RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
(March 23, 2017 at 12:17 am)MysticKnight Wrote: If you are bothered by rambling and uneloquent way of putting things...I suggest you give God and his chosen ones a chance, his holy book and those tasked to explain it. Don't accept them right away but if guidance is to be achieved and sight is to be gained, your best bet is God.

Nononono.

It's a waste of time.  The tooth fairy is as real as God, but she gives my kids money.

You put forth a lot of word salad, but what you don't actually have is anything observable in the Universe which indicates the presence of God.
Reply
#92
RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
(March 23, 2017 at 12:27 am)MysticKnight Wrote: you can believe whatever you want.

So you don't care what I believe then. I guess you'll move on, right?
Reply
#93
RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
(March 23, 2017 at 12:29 am)Jesster Wrote:
(March 23, 2017 at 12:27 am)MysticKnight Wrote: Seeds....perhaps you will think of this more. 

Who knows themselves, knows their Lord.

You could just say "I give up". Bye then.

You know very well your brain is not something that can universally judge all actions you can potential perform or have performed, and give you exact value.

And again, either you are subjective (a delusion created by evolution for survival) or objective (a soul maintained by absolute judge and perceiver).

The soul is obvious. It's manifest. Most cultures in the past believed in it not because they were stupid or anything like that.

It's because it's perceived and obvious.
Reply
#94
RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
I thought you didn't care what I believed. I certainly don't believe in more of your bald assertions.

Also, you got the definitions of "objective" and "subjective" wrong. Open up that dictionary again.
Reply
#95
RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
(March 23, 2017 at 12:32 am)MysticKnight Wrote: You know very well your brain is not something that can universally judge all actions you can potential perform or have performed, and give you exact value.

What you have there, MK, is an artificial problem.    I simply don't need to judge all actions.  Experience is a more-than-adequate guide to whether or not something works, whether or not I enjoy doing it, and whether or not it is in accord with my own morality.

"Exact value" is actually psychologically extraordinarily dangerous.  It's an impossible pursuit, and clinging it too hard will drive you into an obsessive-compulsive mindset.
Reply
#96
RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
(March 23, 2017 at 12:19 am)MysticKnight Wrote: You can't exist outside of perception. Your body can, but you must generated in some perception. Most people think that perception is themselves, yet what is real is something else truly sees them as they are while they only have some fuzzy scent of who they are.

Oh I see where this is going. You're trying to say that things can only exist if they're perceived; that since we humans don't do the perceiving then there must be some powerful entity doing it; therefore "God". Right?

Basically, "to be is to be perceived", à la George Berkeley?

"There once was a man who said: "God
Must think it exceedingly odd
If he finds that this tree
Continues to be
When there's no one about in the Quad."

"Dear Sir,
Your astonishment's odd;
I am always about in the Quad;
And that's why the tree
Will continue to be,
Since observed by
Yours faithfully,
God."
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#97
RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
Concert tickets are another example....

My daughter thinks concert tickets to see BTS is great. Her dad, however, couldn't care less and therefore doesn't think concert tickets to see BTS are great at all.

Opinion matters. Especially to a teenager.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand. 
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work.  If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now.  Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Reply
#98
RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
(March 23, 2017 at 12:32 am)MysticKnight Wrote:
(March 23, 2017 at 12:29 am)Jesster Wrote: You could just say "I give up". Bye then.

You know very well your brain is not something that can universally judge all actions you can potential perform or have performed, and give you exact value.

And again, either you are subjective (a delusion created by evolution for survival) or objective (a soul maintained by absolute judge and perceiver).

The soul is obvious. It's manifest. Most cultures in the past believed in it not because they were stupid or anything like that.

It's because it's perceived and obvious.

There is no such thing as a "soul", not for Muslims or Christians or Jews or Hindus or Buddhists or atheists. There is just nature, our bodies. More specifically our brains in motion. Nobody survives death, when you die, your consciousness dies. The only "afterlife" anyone has is being in the memories of those who survive the dead. But in 5 billion years our species will have long gone extinct, our planet and sun will die eventually and the universe will continue on with absolutely no record of either you or I.

If merely making a claim constituted truth then Apollo would be a real god. If merely making a claim constituted truth then I am dating Angelina Jolie. The only thing god claims prove is the the human ability to mistake imagination for fact.
Reply
#99
RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
(March 23, 2017 at 12:32 am)MysticKnight Wrote: The soul is obvious. It's manifest. Most cultures in the past believed in it not because they were stupid or anything like that.

It's because it's perceived and obvious.

Yeah, sorry, you don't actually get to do an end-run around actually demonstrating your claims, this don't work that way.

Most cultures in the past simply mistook a process that goes on in the brain as a quantity. There is a conscious portion of the human person that cannot be found by looking in the body... it's fairly natural to conclude from there that it's some supernatural thing, if you don't have the technological know-how that would allow you to see the processes that give rise to that consciousness acting within the human body.

Essentially, the cultures of the past believed in the soul for the same reason they believed in a lot of wrong, "obvious" things: it fit with what they observed, they just didn't have the apparatus required to observe further and see that this is incorrect. You, MK, live in a time where you no longer have that excuse, which is why you can't even offer anything other than a simpering "it's obvious," in support of the claim.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
(March 23, 2017 at 7:40 am)Esquilax Wrote:
(March 23, 2017 at 12:32 am)MysticKnight Wrote: The soul is obvious. It's manifest. Most cultures in the past believed in it not because they were stupid or anything like that.

It's because it's perceived and obvious.

Yeah, sorry, you don't actually get to do an end-run around actually demonstrating your claims, this don't work that way.

Most cultures in the past simply mistook a process that goes on in the brain as a quantity. There is a conscious portion of the human person that cannot be found by looking in the body... it's fairly natural to conclude from there that it's some supernatural thing, if you don't have the technological know-how that would allow you to see the processes that give rise to that consciousness acting within the human body.

Essentially, the cultures of the past believed in the soul for the same reason they believed in a lot of wrong, "obvious" things: it fit with what they observed, they just didn't have the apparatus required to observe further and see that this is incorrect. You, MK, live in a time where you no longer have that excuse, which is why you can't even offer anything other than a simpering "it's obvious," in support of the claim.

I don't think Richard Dawkins gets enough credit for his book "The God Delusion" in that he explains in very scientific terms from a biological evolutionary standpoint why god claims exist. Our species perceptions of what we think we see are notoriously flawed. This flaw in evolution is a result of life not always having time to slow down and assess because life evolved to make sudden decisions on the fight or flight aspect of evolution. Dawkins in The God Delusion describes this gap filling as akin to "The moth mistaking the light bulb for natural moonlight". The antelope on the African plain does not always have time to assess if the swaying grass is mere wind, or a lion stalking it. Our species created god claims as a projection of their own qualities on the world around them, that gap filling created a false sense of having the truth. Early deities/gods were earthy, like storm deities and volcano deities, and animal deities. Humanizing the world by giving it the same characteristics as humans gave humans the false sense that they could have some sort of control by bargaining with nature. Our species real ability to survive was never in begging fictional beings, but in our numbers. Those false perceptions did have a real outcome in creating groups based on those bad guesses.

The only place Allah/Yahweh/God/Brahma/Thor/Isis/Apollo exist are in humans imaginations. They are a mere false perception reflecting our own human attributes. False claims can lead to success, just like one can market cigarettes and get people to smoke them even though they are not good for you.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proving the Existence of a First Cause Muhammad Rizvi 3 764 June 23, 2023 at 5:50 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  The existence of God smithd 314 19231 November 23, 2022 at 10:44 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Veridican Argument for the Existence of God The Veridican 14 1663 January 16, 2022 at 4:48 pm
Last Post: brewer
  A 'proof' of God's existence - free will mrj 54 6262 August 9, 2020 at 10:25 am
Last Post: Sal
  Best arguments for or against God's existence mcc1789 22 2743 May 22, 2019 at 9:16 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The Argument Against God's Existence From God's Imperfect Choice Edwardo Piet 53 7973 June 4, 2018 at 2:06 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The Objective Moral Values Argument AGAINST The Existence Of God Edwardo Piet 58 13679 May 2, 2018 at 2:06 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Berkeley's argument for the existence of God FlatAssembler 130 13046 April 1, 2018 at 12:51 pm
Last Post: GUBU
  Arguments for God's Existence from Contingency datc 386 42312 December 1, 2017 at 2:07 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  A good argument for God's existence (long but worth it) Mystic 179 32615 October 26, 2017 at 1:51 pm
Last Post: Crossless2.0



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)