I believe numbers are sacred!

[Jesster]

I remember at a point when people became SUPER rude with her(not most, but some people did).

So what if I don't have the etiquette that Catholic Lady does (I wish I did).

It's no reason to call people names or attack them. We are coming here to have a conversation.

You show no love to actually learning anything pertaining to the sacred. I once made a thread about the nature of Salah and it's wisdom, and people showed so much hostility.

But if someone mocks Salah without understanding, it's ok.

You mock what you don't understand. Understand it first, then perhaps, you are then grounded to mock.

I'm only purposefully rude to people when they start to go batshit crazy on us. So far CL hasn't done that, but you certainly have. There's no conversation to be had with your nonsense. That's why I actually mock you, MK.

Speaking of which, I hear you like numbers. Guess how many fingers I'm holding up.

[Edwardo Piet]

You show no love to actually learning anything pertaining to the sacred.

You show no love to actually learning anything pertaining to the invisible intangible dragon in my invisible intangible garage where I keep my invisible intangible car.

And yet sacredness doesn't even exist but garages, cars and dragons exist (it's an invisible intangible Komodo dragon).

---

I remember at a point when people became SUPER rude with her(not most, but some people did).

So what if I don't have the etiquette that Catholic Lady does (I wish I did).

It's no reason to call people names or attack them. We are coming here to have a conversation.

You show no love to actually learning anything pertaining to the sacred. I once made a thread about the nature of Salah and it's wisdom, and people showed so much hostility.

But if someone mocks Salah without understanding, it's ok.

You mock what you don't understand. Understand it first, then perhaps, you are then grounded to mock.

I'm only purposefully rude to people when they start to go batshit crazy on us. So far CL hasn't done that, but you certainly have. There's no conversation to be had with your nonsense. That's why I actually mock you, MK.

Speaking of which, I hear you like numbers. Guess how many fingers I'm holding up.

I applaud you for it. I actually get excited when you're rude to MK.

[brewer]

MK, while not considering them sacred, attached is a partial list of numbers I hold in higher esteem than yours.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hba...uncon.html

[Homeless Nutter]

Suppose I didn't have a reason, why would I be proof of that? What if most theists are grounded with reason and I was not?

Some theists may be "grounded with reason" on matters other than their religion - they're still fantastically deluded, when it comes to their preferred fairy-tales. They're just better at compartmentalization than you are.

And no - you're not "proof" of theists' lack of reason. You're just one piece of evidence - be it a very compelling one...

Catholic_Lady has presented solid down to earth arguments for God with objective morality. She presented even a Proffessor explaining the moral argument very well and proving each of it's premises. 

And yet - she's NOT a muslim... Sure, you can call on people of other faiths, when you think it supports your views - but deep down you KNOW you believe her to be deluded and wrong, since she doesn't worship your prophet's mighty shlong... So why should I be convinced of her reasoning skills, if you yourself are also still not a catholic?

You wouldn't know proof and evidence if it hit you in the head!

Perhaps. But we'll never know, since you dumbasses have been unable to find any for thousands of years.
However, I do know horse-sh*t, when someone is pelting me with it.

If you had any proof for your dumb religion's claims - everybody would be a f*cking shia muslim, just like everybody with a brain (and access to information) accepts the same scientific theories, once they are proven - regardless of what 3rd world hole in the ground they may live in. All you have is some sh*tty poetry, some made-up stories and some unevidenced claims, that you keep repeating with a smug, self-important tone, like it's all supposed to be obviously true to everyone - just like every other religious nut-job.

[Edwardo Piet]

You wouldn't know proof and evidence if it hit you in the head!

OMG you are such a cocksucker. And not in a good way. ALL your threads and posts are examples of the fact that YOU wouldn't know proof and evidence if it hit you on the head.

And futhermore: You wouldn't know a valid argument if your life depended on it let alone a sound one.

[downbeatplumb]

You heard it from MK himself. 69 is the angelic position.

Not the way I do it.

[Edwardo Piet]

71 is better.

[Mystic]

And yet - she's NOT a muslim... Sure, you can call on people of other faiths, when you think it supports your views - but deep down you KNOW you believe her to be deluded and wrong, since she doesn't worship your prophet's mighty shlong... So why should I be convinced of her reasoning skills, if you yourself are also still not a catholic? 

See the thread I made about this. Tiberius closed it, but it answers this in sufficient detail.

[The Grand Nudger]

Numerology thread?  At some point it might be easier to catalog the strange things a person doesn't believe in.

[Mystic]

Numerology thread?  At some point it might be easier to catalog the strange things a person doesn't believe in.

There is precise information dna follows (there is also room for diversion and mutations). so what makes you think the spiritual world and higher world and the soul doesn't have precise equations it must follow and grow by?

There is rules in every stage a faithful lover of God ascends to, because everything is created in truth.

God has encompassed everything in number and everything is in a written book by which Angels act upon before it occurs to this world.