The day of reckoning has arrived.

[Whateverist]

Take Einstein and his theory of relativity.
He try and try to work out how to get it until one day it pop up in his mind.
Where you think it pop up from?
It pop up from his subconscious mind.
Nobody told him.
I already explained at nauseam about this topic and about the conscious mind and the subconscious mind
or what you are aware so far and what is hidden in the subconscious mind.

Intuitional science is all about to allow what is hidden in the subconscious mind to emerge in the conscious mind.  

So we are both intrigued by the subconscious mind and how it supports the conscious mind. But unlike you I don't think everything that bubbles out of it is golden or 'sciency'. Of course once you practice wooey yoga long enough it probably all looks good. I wonder if you study your every turd to see what insights might be gained? (It certainly seems that way.)

[Little Rik]

What about the space Nanny?
Does the space come from the stars too?  

Beside how do you know that the stars came first?
How can you put the stars in a non place?
Wouldn't you need a space to put the stars first?  

Okay, so you concede that you worded your question poorly. Let's pick nits.

Space is nothing - vacuum, void. Where does one put nothing? 

So you want to question the BBT. Is that what this is all about? 

Why don't you state your hypothesis so we can pick that apart, too.

It is obvious that what you may think or dream of can not possibly be as powerful as you.
Suppose you dream of an elephant.
Do you think that this elephant of your dreams or imagination can do what you can do?
Of course it can not.
Similarly we humans are powerless to be able to do things that the mind that created us in his imagination can do but we fool ourselves in thinking that we are at the very top of this reality
and nobody is behind it.
A drop of water can not be as powerful as the ocean but once this drop merge in the ocean it will
have the same quality as the ocean.
I don't really think that you know an iota of how the universal system works so let us stop right here.  

[FatAndFaithless]

I finally figured out who Rik reminds me of. He's literally the Sphinx from Mystery Men, if any of you remember that movie. He speaks in new-agey contradictory deepities, it's perfect.

[Little Rik]

You don't get it Crunchy.
There is nothing wrong with the scientific method that you just show.
Intuition however is a total different thing.
Take Einstein and his theory of relativity.
He try and try to work out how to get it until one day it pop up in his mind.
Where you think it pop up from?
It pop up from his subconscious mind.
Nobody told him.
I already explained at nauseam about this topic and about the conscious mind and the subconscious mind
or what you are aware so far and what is hidden in the subconscious mind.

Intuitional science is all about to allow what is hidden in the subconscious mind to emerge in the conscious mind.  

Bolded mine.  You have a more fundamentally flawed understanding of science than I previously thought. If you think Einstein's theories didn't involve enormous amounts of testing, refining, and tweaking based on findings...then I really don't know what to tell you.  Nothing about Einstein's work was a sudden, instant revelation or singular spontaneous eruption of ideas.  It required a lot of work..following methods like the one Crunchy depicted.

Correct in saying that...........theories did involve enormous amounts of testing, refining, and tweaking based on findings but incorrect in thinking that at the same time there can not be sudden revelations.

To me sudden revelations come as a reward for putting a lot of effort in a particular study.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epiphany_(feeling)

[FatAndFaithless]

Bolded mine.  You have a more fundamentally flawed understanding of science than I previously thought. If you think Einstein's theories didn't involve enormous amounts of testing, refining, and tweaking based on findings...then I really don't know what to tell you.  Nothing about Einstein's work was a sudden, instant revelation or singular spontaneous eruption of ideas.  It required a lot of work..following methods like the one Crunchy depicted.

Correct in saying that...........theories did involve enormous amounts of testing, refining, and tweaking based on findings but incorrect in thinking that at the same time there can not be sudden revelations.

To me sudden revelations come as a reward for putting a lot of effort in a particular study.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epiphany_(feeling)

And epiphanies come after all of the testing and refining, Rik.  It's the end product of going through the scientific method until the correct answer (or at least an answer closer to correct) is discovered or formulated.  It's not a separate process, it's part of the process.

[Catholic_Lady]

..What?

I don't recall anyone here saying science is the "Panacea" to human problems, it's just currently our most accurate way of investigating the world and how reality works.

That being said, the answer to your questions could very well be "We don't know yet."

What?
Sorry mate but I already lost the count of how many times people here say again and again that
science is the way and only way to solve human problems.  

Science is simply the study of the physical/natural world. It is a different category entirely from religion (which deals with the supernatural) and there's no reason why either theists or atheists should say the 2 are mutually exclusive or somehow come into conflict. 

These posts of your only make the rest of us look like fools.

[Cyberman]

Sorry mate but I already lost the count of how many times people here say again and again that
science is the way and only way to solve human problems.

So what's inside the green box?

Just to illustrate the problem for you, I'll rephrase the question.

How would we set about determining what's inside the green box?

[Cyberman]

These posts of your only make the rest of us look like fools.

No, only him.

[Angrboda]

day of reckoning

noun
1.
the time when one is called to account for one's actions, to pay one's debts, or to fulfill one's promises or obligations.

Well this was underwhelming.

[Whateverist]

Maybe he meant to say a "day of recking him", cause that's been the upshot.