|
Don't you just love the hypocrisy of religion.
|
 (July 6, 2017 at 9:21 am)Lutrinae Wrote: Not everything in the bible is to be taken literally. Stevie, is that you in disguise? You know that hacking an account is wrong.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
god punishes children for the actions of their parents (hypocrisy 1) yet he's supposed to be a god of justice. Therefore the Christian god doesn't exist.
It's hard enough being a bastard. Wait...if Churches had turned me away I wouldn't have wasted much of my time and guilt for so many years.. Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk 
Well, from time to time, it is just absolutely necessary to throw Jesus and his archaic take on things under the bus.
How can 'Christians' support a thrice married and twice divorced poon hound for president?? How will they explain it to "The Children" ?? Poor old Jesus, titular figure head, just so long as He knows His place at the end of the line behind all His followers. The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
"The family that prays together...is brainwashing their children."- Albert Einstein
we don't know much about God's parents either . . . .
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
We know enough.
![[Image: poster_1545170c.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.telegraph.co.uk%2Fmultimedia%2Farchive%2F01545%2Fposter_1545170c.jpg)
So, what was the nature of Mary's orgasm ??
Continuous? Peak and valley(s) ? One biggee ?? Or the delayed one as she lit the cigarette after God had left ?? The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
I'd say she had quite a cigar!
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear. 
The infanticide thing is more descriptive than prescriptive. It's not a recommendation.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
It would be easier to acknowledge this hypocrisy if it wasn't so easy to point out actual inconsistencies and contradictions WITHIN the damn bible. The document itself can't make up its own fucking mind about practically anything so using any of it as a guide to anything is all the indication a person would need to determine that those who claim to follow it are certifiably nuts.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
--- There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
