Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 24, 2024, 6:01 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thoughts
#21
RE: Thoughts
(September 26, 2017 at 3:44 pm)Godscreated Wrote:
(September 26, 2017 at 3:21 pm)Crossless2.0 Wrote: Actually, none of that is . . . anything you've ever bothered reading.

But what the hell. Enlighten us. In broad strokes, what is the theory of evolution?

I've read it, unlike you I look at opposing arguments. That's called studying, something it seems you want do. You trust in your evolutionary science gods to tell you what to believe and never question they could be wrong, where is that critical thinking atheist chairish. Short but true evolutionary science definition, bunk.

GC

(September 26, 2017 at 3:39 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: Says the idiot that didn't refute any of it.

It's bunk it refutes itself if one uses critical thinking.

Ok, so what is the theory and how is it self-refuting?
Reply
#22
RE: Thoughts
Quote:I've read it, unlike you I look at opposing arguments. That's called studying, something it seems you want do. You trust in your evolutionary science gods to tell you what to believe and never question they could be wrong, where is that critical thinking atheist chairish. Short but true evolutionary science definition, bunk.

GC

You keep that up and you are going to give other astonishing idiots a bad name.
Reply
#23
RE: Thoughts
(September 26, 2017 at 4:48 pm)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:I've read it, unlike you I look at opposing arguments. That's called studying, something it seems you want do. You trust in your evolutionary science gods to tell you what to believe and never question they could be wrong, where is that critical thinking atheist chairish. Short but true evolutionary science definition, bunk.

GC

You keep that up and you are going to give other astonishing idiots a bad name.

Oh, we've been down this road before. As you would expect of a cultist, anyone who disagrees with him and is persuaded by the evidence for the theory has faith in 'science gods'. Then he assures us he really understands the theory without deigning to explain his 'understanding'. Then comes blanket dismissal of what he claims to understand without bothering to explain why he thinks it fails.

And if we're lucky he'll tell us again about the nuclear physicist in his church who also doesn't understand biological theory.   Rolleyes
Reply
#24
RE: Thoughts
Best of luck with everything, Lek. If you decide to come back sometime, I'm sure you will be welcomed.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
#25
RE: Thoughts
(September 25, 2017 at 4:21 pm)ek Wrote: I came to sharp turn in the road a couple of months ago and haven't posted anything here since then and probably won't for a while.  I have a different outlook on things and have lost some passions I had and gained some others.  I spent 3 1/2 years in this forum defending and expounding on theism and christianity and I don't know that I changed the mind of any atheist.  Hopefully, I convinced some visitors who were on the edge to stay with their faith.  You never really know because there's no feedback.  I know that there's good stuff that comes from the discussion here, but I've lost my desire to continue for now.  I've seen numerous people who have shown up at our church's food distribution or meals and then show up at the worship services down the road.  It seems that actions get people's attention and when they become interested in your faith they come to you. Then they are ready to listen to what you have to say.

If they happen to be atheists who are still woo-believers then who knows, their defective minds might be swayed. That's why it's such useless label. I'd be impressed if you convinced a rational skeptic. But that would take a miracle, and well...those don't exist.
Also convincing someone to stay in their faith is like convincing a slave not to cast off their chains and reject their enslavement. Really, REALLY not something to be proud of, kid. And of course when you offer incentives like free food and community, people will show up. It's one of the unfair advantages religion has, that it's the majority of the population and has so much access to ill-gotten resources. Again, nothing to be proud of. That's emotionally manipulative and predatory. The only way you can actually bring anyone to your side, attacking the vulnerable when they can't defend against your bullshit and luring them in with lies.

(September 25, 2017 at 4:21 pm)Lek Wrote: I have benefited personally from this forum.  I wanted to get hit with every argument against my faith that is out there and you atheists were all too happy to accommodate me in that regard.  In fact, my butt is still smoking, but I've matured because of it.  I've actually become able to look at issues from different sides.  I can understand why so many atheists left christianity and can understand the way they think.  I now believe in the evolutionary process; it doesn't negate the need for God.  Though I disagree with their sexual morality, I support equal rights for homosexuals because we're all citizens and equal under the law no matter what our faith or lack of it.  I can also understand the anxiety that transsexuals experience day to day.  We don't have to agree on everything in order to come together to create a better society.

If you weren't emancipated from your delusions, that's not a benefit. Your definitions are skewed but what else is new? You pretend to look at things from different sides but you're still a homophobe, you've just graduated to not being a bigot too. Don't pat yourself on the back til you rid your mind of the poison causing you to think there's anything wrong with what other people do that harms no one. And while evolution may not negate the need for a god it does negate every historical myth regarding creation and whatnot, so regardless of your interpretation of whatever holy book you cherry-pick, you're still wrong and are being willfully dishonest not to acknowledge and admit this. So you're a bald-faced liar, but you want to condemn homosexuals for perceived immoral behavior? Fuck the fuck off, pissant. Your toxic beliefs are what are keeping society from getting better, dipshit. Read a fucking book other than something that holds boiling a goat in its mother's milk as a greater offense than rape.

(September 25, 2017 at 4:21 pm)Lek Wrote: I can't say that I like every person that I've come in contact with here, and not everybody likes me, but for the most part we've had civilized and respectful discussions.  Oh well, I try to be liked, but I gotta be me.  Anyone who makes an impact won't be liked by everybody.

I'll finish by saying that as an American I observe that the christian church in America has in large part strayed from the church that Christ founded and is in need of reform.  But it seems that as church congregations shrink, those left behind are the true believers that are going to bring the church back to its roots and the world will again see God through them.  To that end, I intend to use the time that I would have spent in this forum to do God's work for the people around me.  Maybe they'll see God at work, and if thy ask me about him then I'll tell them about him.

Feeling's mutual, prick. You want respect? Stop being dishonest. That's a good way to start. Hitler had a big impact on people; sure you want to use that analogy?

Fuck off with that reform bullshit. Did you never even open your damn holy book? You can't reform something built on a foundation of complete and utter shit. There's no good to stray from, it's all fucking bad, rookie. You weren't even worth this rant. Good riddance.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?

---

There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
Reply
#26
RE: Thoughts
(September 26, 2017 at 3:18 pm)Godscreated Wrote:
(September 25, 2017 at 6:05 pm)JackRussell Wrote: Always good to have a science denying hick on your side.

Glad their is no god to be disappointed in you.

GC has some reading to do before I know he's honest.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/

None of that is proof of evolution, you do not even understand the science you think is real.

I think I must be psychic, I am sure I said elsewhere that creationists always deny this without clearly ever having read it.

If you don't think I understand the science, please show me the flaws in the article so we can discuss them. And I can assure you I have read a lot more than read just Theobald. Might even invite my sister here, with her PhD in Genetics. But then, she's a woman, what the fuck would she know about science.

You haven't studied shit, just swallowed it.
Reply
#27
RE: Thoughts
(September 26, 2017 at 3:18 pm)Godscreated Wrote:
(September 25, 2017 at 6:05 pm)JackRussell Wrote: Always good to have a science denying hick on your side.

Glad their is no god to be disappointed in you.

GC has some reading to do before I know he's honest.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/

None of that is proof of evolution, you do not even understand the science you think is real.

Evolution = Descent with Modification.  What is there to understand that does not involve the many complexities and nuances of Science?  The concept of evolution is straightforward.
Reply
#28
RE: Thoughts
Not to a shithead like, G-C.  He really thinks his fucking god played in the dirt and created man.  He really is a bible-thumping retard.  He is not just playing one on TV.
Reply
#29
RE: Thoughts
(September 26, 2017 at 3:18 pm)Godscreated Wrote:
(September 25, 2017 at 6:05 pm)JackRussell Wrote: Always good to have a science denying hick on your side.

Glad their is no god to be disappointed in you.

GC has some reading to do before I know he's honest.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/

None of that is proof of evolution, you do not even understand the science you think is real.

You say that like you actually know something about it. Dodgy

(September 26, 2017 at 3:44 pm)Godscreated Wrote: It's bunk it refutes itself if one uses critical thinking.

How the fuck would you know anything about critical thinking?
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
#30
RE: Thoughts
(September 26, 2017 at 3:18 pm)Godscreated Wrote:
(September 25, 2017 at 6:05 pm)JackRussell Wrote: Always good to have a science denying hick on your side.

Glad their is no god to be disappointed in you.

GC has some reading to do before I know he's honest.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/

None of that is proof of evolution, you do not even understand the science you think is real.

And if you think that science says they have "proof" of evolution, you show that you don't have the basic comprehension of science to school anybody on the subject.

(September 26, 2017 at 3:44 pm)Godscreated Wrote:
(September 26, 2017 at 3:21 pm)Crossless2.0 Wrote: Actually, none of that is . . . anything you've ever bothered reading.

But what the hell. Enlighten us. In broad strokes, what is the theory of evolution?

I've read it, unlike you I look at opposing arguments. That's called studying, something it seems you want do. You trust in your evolutionary science gods to tell you what to believe and never question they could be wrong, where is that critical thinking atheist chairish. Short but true evolutionary science definition, bunk.

GC


Lying for jesus again, huh?  I welcome serious challenges to ANY scientific theory.  It does nothing but expand our knowledge.  See, thinking people don't have such an emotional investment in what piece of knowledge is right or wrong.  You don't study.  You only read what supports your fairy tale and what denigrates everyone else's knowledge and beliefs.  Everything that you post about evolution shows that you got your "knowledge" from AIG and the like.  You should be embarrassed, and the fact you're not shows how dishonest you are with yourself and others.
"The last superstition of the human mind is the superstition that religion in itself is a good thing."  - Samuel Porter Putnam
 
           

Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Some Thoughts on the Goodness of God God_is_Good 49 2086 April 10, 2024 at 7:18 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Some thoughts on "god" The Valkyrie 19 472 April 5, 2024 at 3:58 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  A Believer's Thoughts on Faith rlp21858 168 11436 July 9, 2022 at 3:43 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  More thoughts about Immaculate Conception Graufreud 57 8523 July 31, 2018 at 8:02 pm
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  My thoughts on heaven dyresand 24 7174 November 3, 2015 at 5:57 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Random Thoughts on Hell: Daddy's Crazy Athene 47 8826 September 18, 2015 at 10:04 am
Last Post: TheRocketSurgeon
  Thoughts on Atheism and Apologetics Randy Carson 105 18397 July 4, 2015 at 5:39 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Thoughts on gays and sin YahwehIsTheWay 77 18050 December 10, 2014 at 6:44 pm
Last Post: strawdawg
Video What are your thoughts on G-Man dyresand 18 6932 October 9, 2014 at 8:41 am
Last Post: Dystopia
  Im back! - Ray Comfort and Ken Ham & Bill Nye and Ken Ham Debate thoughts xr34p3rx 2 1646 March 9, 2014 at 3:47 am
Last Post: xr34p3rx



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)