Posts: 1355
Threads: 20
Joined: June 28, 2017
Reputation:
17
"Republicunt": why use terms like this?
November 11, 2017 at 1:50 pm
I've noticed terms like 'republicunt' being throw around quite a lot on this forum, and I'm wondering what this accomplishes. Any time derogatory terms like this are used, it makes the argument ad-hominem instead of issue based, and I'm unlikely to find the point being made persuasive even if I'd normally agree with it. In fact, it almost discredits the source in my eyes because I see them as biased.
Even if you disagree with something or someone entirely, name-calling seems counterproductive, because it alienates the parties that you are discussing. It serves to build echo-chambers, and it never makes you more likely to hear a rational response.
Am I missing something? Is there any benefit to this style of discussion?
Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: "Republicunt": why use terms like this?
November 11, 2017 at 1:58 pm
Theres also Christards
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Posts: 46103
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: "Republicunt": why use terms like this?
November 11, 2017 at 2:01 pm
(November 11, 2017 at 1:50 pm)shadow Wrote: I've noticed terms like 'republicunt' being throw around quite a lot on this forum, and I'm wondering what this accomplishes. Any time derogatory terms like this are used, it makes the argument ad-hominem instead of issue based, and I'm unlikely to find the point being made persuasive even if I'd normally agree with it. In fact, it almost discredits the source in my eyes because I see them as biased.
Even if you disagree with something or someone entirely, name-calling seems counterproductive, because it alienates the parties that you are discussing. It serves to build echo-chambers, and it never makes you more likely to hear a rational response.
Am I missing something? Is there any benefit to this style of discussion?
No, there's no benefit at all. Some people haven't seemed to master the art of disagreeing without being disagreeable.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: "Republicunt": why use terms like this?
November 11, 2017 at 2:02 pm
Personally I don't think it serves any purpose other than to divide people further.
Posts: 30129
Threads: 304
Joined: April 18, 2014
Reputation:
92
RE: "Republicunt": why use terms like this?
November 11, 2017 at 2:06 pm
PMSNBC is a funny one I hear on the radio frequently.
So too Susan Saranwrap, feminazis, anchorettes and drive by media.
IOWs, both sides do it, and I'm accustomed to it.
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
Posts: 2461
Threads: 16
Joined: November 12, 2013
Reputation:
17
RE: "Republicunt": why use terms like this?
November 11, 2017 at 2:12 pm
I think a lot of shitty people are drawn to the progressive side of the spectrum because it gives you social cover to be racist/sexist/bigotted. Minimalist is an awful person. But solely by calling the correct people cunts and retards, mums the word.
It's like Alec Baldwin. Guy is a known dumpster fire of a person, but he doesn't like trump, so everybody overlooks him treating women like shit or calling people faggots.
Posts: 1355
Threads: 20
Joined: June 28, 2017
Reputation:
17
RE: "Republicunt": why use terms like this?
November 11, 2017 at 2:12 pm
(November 11, 2017 at 2:06 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: PMSNBC is a funny one I hear on the radio frequently.
So too Susan Saranwrap, feminazis, anchorettes and drive by media.
IOWs, both sides do it, and I'm accustomed to it.
Totally. And how helpful is it when 'the other side' starts name calling? Does it ever make you more likely to listen to their views and have a rational discussion?
If not, what is accomplished by returning the insult?
Posts: 28310
Threads: 522
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: "Republicunt": why use terms like this?
November 11, 2017 at 2:16 pm
Instant blanket condemnation.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 1897
Threads: 33
Joined: August 25, 2015
Reputation:
27
RE: "Republicunt": why use terms like this?
November 11, 2017 at 2:20 pm
I call them cunts, because they act like cunts. When they stop acting like a cunt, I'll stop calling them that.
"Tradition" is just a word people use to make themselves feel better about being an asshole.
Posts: 1355
Threads: 20
Joined: June 28, 2017
Reputation:
17
RE: "Republicunt": why use terms like this?
November 11, 2017 at 2:36 pm
(This post was last modified: November 11, 2017 at 2:36 pm by shadow.)
(November 11, 2017 at 2:20 pm)Divinity Wrote: I call them cunts, because they act like cunts. When they stop acting like a cunt, I'll stop calling them that.
Why, though? What's the actual purpose of calling anyone that? I can only assume it is to create a hostile environment for them to chase people you dislike away - pressure them out of the group. Is that the outcome you want on a discussion forum, though; to ensure that you will not come in contact with anyone from massively powerful groups with millions if not billions of members (like Republicans or Christians)? Do you not want a chance to either consider their views, or to try to convince them of your own, or understand their paradigm even if you don't agree with it?
I think that attitude is close-minded and divisive.
|
