(June 14, 2018 at 7:51 am)Jehanne Wrote:(June 14, 2018 at 7:10 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: No doubt. And the way you responded to the other arguments; is why I don’t feel a need to rush a study and share it here.
Please, take your time, and share it when you are ready, if ever. By the way, I don't know why you are continuing to quote Vilenkin in your sig; that issue (if there was even one to begin with), has been laid to rest:
https://debunkingwlc.wordpress.com/
I have seen where Vilenkin has said, that Craig is not misusing his work although he may not come to the same conclusions in regards to Craig’s arguments for God (disputed the anti- WLC sites claims). I also believe that o have heard, or at minimum always understood Craig to mean Universe in exactly the way Vilenkin describes in your article. You seem to have an obsession and hate for William Lane Craig. I think it leads you to jump to conclusions and clouds your judgement.
But I don’t see where Dr. Craig has anything to do at all with my signature quote of Vilenkin anyway. I don’t understand how you are making a connection or what you are saying has been laid to rest. Is there a rational connection that I am missing?
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
