Ontological Disproof of God

[Fidel_Castronaut]

No, I have not read whatever it is you sent me.  

Administrator Notice
I suggest strongly that you do so. Don’t bother throwing accusations of mistreatment at us. You’ve been treated very fairly and have only been asked not to act silly by repeatedly (purposefully) mis-using the quotation function.

Every other response to you as far as I can see has generally been due to your own conduct here and I can see nothing actionable.

[Angrboda]

The third sentence does not allow insult at all; there is no allowing insult up to a point permitted by the third sentence.

Negatio was merely speculating on the possible ethical responses staff may have taken, because insult was already running rampant, so, if staff had stepped in at some point, that would

have been allowing insult up to a point, Negatio is not maintaining that newbie protection allows for insult up to a point, that is absolutely absurd, the law entirely and completely disallows

insulting a newbie, criminal newbie haters will never get that through their sicko-troll-imagining superstitious heads, they dream of some hiatus in their law, when there is none, it speaks

solidly, NO INSULTING newbies !  You guys are, in fact, toast. I am not the type to prosecute, but an arbitrator is, and, being able to write persuasively, I can, if and when I choose,

arrange for an arbitration regarding violation of my rights as a newbie, so that all is not simply swept under the rug.  Which I would never have dreamed of doing, until, I just now 

witnessing  the total lynch mob which is, at this very moment, destructively gathered on this site, composed of deluded and confused members who fail to see that they are the trolls which 

so unrelentingly project their very own troll-being onto innocent newbies.  Fucking fucked up, and, otherwise nice people...Negatio

In your rush to judgement, you seem to have overlooked the first paragraph of the rules which clearly states that, "the final determination on how to interpret these rules is left to the staff." So, no, you don't have any argument, even if you had any "rights" to post on this forum and be treated a certain way. You have no rights here. Participation on these forums is a privilege which can be revoked at any time for any reason. There is no contractual obligation on behalf of the operators of this site because, as any first year business law student can tell you, you have not provided any tangible consideration to the operators of this site for the privilege you enjoy. Now you're just talking like a loon in addition to being an idiot with reading comprehension issues.

[KevinM1]

Eh, his late stage trolling is a lot less interesting than his previous work.

[Abaddon_ire]

The third sentence is a portion of the primemost rules of the Atheist forum written for the sake of protecting new members, Newbies.

Negatio was a newbie in an "other" sector of the forum, under the protection of sentence three, which point blank protects Negatio as a Newbie.  

The  Flaming consideration cannot even touch sentence three in any way whatsoever, as long as Negatio is a Newbie. Who would flame a Newbie, only criminal members.

Every person now responding to Negatio's explication of the forum law which protected him as a newbie, flamed Negatio as a newbie, and all are at jeopardy, thus the mistaken twisting 

desperation to contort the forum's newbie protection law into something it is not. Khemikal is here railing against me when he is currently blocked from Negatio's thread !  He is the

forum cracker criminal, you all cow tow to his nonsense and follow.  He never posits anything against the OP that pure assertive nonsense, nothing real, yea, sure, I don't understand 

Spinoza or Sartre, absurd.  The entire forum is in operation against its own rules in the obsessive compulsive to constitute Duane as a troll, it just will not stop.

I have to cut down trees and prepare for winter; am taking a break, if staff remains indifferent to the reality of what has transpired I will see about implementing arbitration. Members 

have conducted themselves criminally against their own laws, and, of course, refuse to see what is the case, deluded persons who believe in trolls telling Duane he is conflating text 

simplest of possible direct reading of applicable forum law.

Quite possibly your dumbest post yet.

Let's try an analogy.

Suppose I silently walked into your home without a word and took a massive dump on your living room carpet. Suppose when you immediately protest, I insist that you are stupid for not understanding why you took a dump on my living room carpet. Suppose you then patiently explained that this is your house and your rules apply. Suppose further that I then insisted that you didn't understand the rules of your own home and to prove the point had multiple more dumps in your living room kitchen and den. All the while saying that the rules were actually mine and you didn't understand your own rules.

What would you think? Do you think? Of course you do not.

As for "implementing arbitration" that is utterly stupid. This is a private forum run privately. There is nothing you can do about that. Any member can be included or excluded for any reason or even none. Much the same as you can throw someone out of your home for any reason or none. Any moron could work that out.

[KevinM1]

I, for one, would love to see Neggy attempt to 'implement arbitration'. I'm expecting actual puppets.

[Whateverist]

If this place has been nothing but a source of negativity for you, then why remain?  There are plenty of other atheist forums and philosophy forums on the web.  It's not like Tibs gets extra funding from malcontents, so you staying here isn't doing anyone a favor.

Truer words were never written.  We simply do not deserve Negativo's continued presence.  No, really.

---

Negatio is the most painfully boring troll I have ever encountered here at AF.

And that is against some pretty stiff competition at that.

[Tiberius]

Order in the court! The right honorable Judge Tibs presiding in the matter of negatio vs Internet Forum #162456, will the plaintiff rise for swearing in?

[Whateverist]

INTRODUCTION FORUM RULES
Whilst we are generally lenient with insulting language / rudeness in other forums, this kind of behaviour is explicitly disallowed in the Introductions forum. Please welcome new members to the community in a nice manner, or refrain from welcoming them at all.

Note that this does not give you a carte blanche to act in an insulting or rude manner in other areas of the forums. Please try to be rude as possible to trolls like Negativo, then report them to the staff and let us ban the shit out of take care of them.

Fixed that for you.  

[KevinM1]

INTRODUCTION FORUM RULES
Whilst we are generally lenient with insulting language / rudeness in other forums, this kind of behaviour is explicitly disallowed in the Introductions forum. Please welcome new members to the community in a nice manner, or refrain from welcoming them at all.

Note that this does not give you a carte blanche to act in an insulting or rude manner in other areas of the forums. Please try to be rude as possible to trolls like Negativo, then report them to the staff and let us ban the shit out of take care of them.

Fixed that for you.  

A much needed revision. I approve.

[negatio]

radically fallacious argument by extension shit on carpet indeed...shit on duane for shiggles for weeks... when we first met you demanded simplicity...now you intentionally demand and create complexity when I have given you simplicity...I say mediate/arbitrate sentence three..i am correct...sentence 3 is primal forum law...just trying to spread sen. 3 around clumsily...now %50....going down fast...snowballing injustice...erase thread asap to wipe evidence...fuck fucking duane...he heap big troll...whateverist refer to staff you do not take care of shit...My problem is, up to this very moment, that ignorance insists on handling the situation wherein ignorance is absolutely sure I am a troll; your goddamn law instructs you to refer the question to staff; staff joins in on insulting duane...oh you are a troll...every fucking stranger around here is a troll for member/staff troll mentality...Neither the membership nor staff were or are cognizant of the introductory primal forum law...duane is being constituted a troll, via insult, against forum law... He is going down fast via accusations absent a fair hearing; how can members and staff be so stupid thinking since they are private they cannot tort duane ! ? Cease and desist slandering duane viia a paranoid schizophrenic delusion that is a troll...piss me off and I'll play real hardball; it does not matter if I am finally banned for exhibiting total disrespect for your corrupt staff...do not continue to tort duane...he does not even think it worthwhile to pursue the dream of having a rational interchange with rational ordinary reasonable men...Duane has fallen into a nest of troll-obsessed paranoid schizophrenics who put him into a schizophrenogenic double bind with systematically misleading doublespeak...bigtime lawsuit for tort...turn civil; obey forum law against insult within any sector of the forum whatsoever...if members cannot see that the ownership will tolerate some insult, when really they do not in fact wish to tolerate insult at all, and in sentence 3, have said precisely so NO INSULT anywhere on forum, that is the law !