Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 19, 2024, 5:02 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ontological Disproof of God
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Khemikal Wrote:There are 5 or 6 of us in total, that I know of, including you.
Interesting.  My guess is that you are in Eastern Kentucky...Negatio

[quote pid='1809640' dateline='1535991024']



Anyway it seems you've got paragraphs handled for this post. If you can just keep it up I'm sure you'll get on much better here.
[/quote]

emjay Wrote:I'm sure you'll get on much better here.
At this point there is no sense in my proceeding to further engage members of the Atheist Forum absent calling for 


a consensus vote, to be cast by forum members who undertook meaningful participation in recent discussion on my 

thread.

I have extensively explained, during  exchange with members, the reasoning which constitutes my 


disproof of Yahweh; Jehovah; and Jesus Christ, over and over again, until I am blue-in-the-face.

If certain chosen members agree to participate in the consensus vote, I will post a double spaced copy of the most 

recent writing of Part I of the OP for their perusal.

Members invited to participate in a consensus vote are:

emjay; abaddon__ire; Jormungandr; Mathilda; bennyboy; Vulcanlogician; Kernel Sohcahtoa; SaStrike;  Losty; 


robvalue; Khemikal; KevinM1; Lucanus; Whateverist; mh.brewer; Negatio; Kit; and, Astreja .

If the above-named members all agree to participate in the proposed consensus vote, I will post a double spaced

copy of Part I of:  An Important Ramification of Spinoza's Dictum is Disproof of the Deity of Yahweh, Jehovah, and 

Jesus Christ. 


Members need merely reply with a Yes (meaning Negatio has given us a viable theoretical/ontological demonstration 


against the Deity of Yahweh; Jehovah; and, Jesus Christ, or), No. Thank you all. Negatio.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
I give up. You showed you knew what paragraphs were in your last post to me and in the OP you put on that bitcoin forum... but now in this one you've seemingly just put blank lines in randomly, which will be just as annoying/confusing going forward as solid walls of text. I honestly can't tell whether you're doing this on purpose now, just to be contrary and just to piss people off... if you are then congratulations, it's working. So I wash my hands of the whole business; work it out for yourself, or don't... whatever.

As for your vote... I abstain. Frankly I don't care enough about the OP, one way or the other, to make a judgement on it, nor am I expert enough in logic to do that anyway. I was just trying to help you use the site, but was happy to leave actual debate of your position to better minds than me.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Going back to the original post, I think there is a vast difference between anarchy and freedom. But most don't seem to understand this till they think of it. Is nudity "freedom of expression" or, anarchy? Is porn "freedom of speech" or, anarchy?

I think that if we don't learn the difference between anarchy and freedom, the anarchist will have the freedom to use the word "freedom" against us and call us tyrants! When, in actuality, they are being anarchistic tyrants! Fucking Hippies!
My girlfriend thinks I'm a stalker. Well...she's not my girlfriend "yet".

I discovered a new vitamin that fights cancer. I call it ...B9

I also invented a diet pill. It works great but had to quit taking it because of the side effects. Turns out my penis is larger and my hair grew back. And whoa! If you think my hair is nice!

When does size truly matter? When it's TOO big!

I'm currently working on a new pill I call "Destenze". However...now my shoes don't fit.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
[Image: 23410984.jpg]
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Authority without freedom is tyranny(Nazi shit, Shari'a shit, religious shit). Freedom without law(authority) is anarchy(Hippy shit).
My girlfriend thinks I'm a stalker. Well...she's not my girlfriend "yet".

I discovered a new vitamin that fights cancer. I call it ...B9

I also invented a diet pill. It works great but had to quit taking it because of the side effects. Turns out my penis is larger and my hair grew back. And whoa! If you think my hair is nice!

When does size truly matter? When it's TOO big!

I'm currently working on a new pill I call "Destenze". However...now my shoes don't fit.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
[quote pid='1809640' dateline='1535991024']


I just meant 'old' in the sense of 'not modern'... not 'tech savvy'... more likely to be surrounded by books and records than computers and smartphones.


[/quote]

emjay Wrote:I just meant 'old' in the sense of 'not modern'... not 'tech savvy'... more likely to be surrounded by books and records than computers and smartphones.
Records ?!  I have not seen a record in decades, and my last album was the White Album by the Beatles.  I had records as a boy, but none are around here.  I have four desktops awaiting me finding the time to trouble shoot and repair them, I employ two smartphones constantly, and a third needs a new battery.

I was just now simply trying to please Abaddon, and use double spacing, and what you see is the mess that was simply the result of hitting the enter key twice, and that is all that it is;----I am not acting in pursuit of some clandestine acts whereby I am attempting to place everyone in a schizophrenogenic double bind, and, make fools of you, and all that absurd nonsense. Jesus fucking Christ !

Of course I have a small series of theoretical works, i.e., books which I peruse and or read intently for days on end.
I am plenty tech savvy when it comes to repairing computers and overcoming software problems.

Yes, you have been beautiful to me, just beautiful.  It absolutely astonishes me that both you and Abaddon are throwing me away on account of double spacing, paragraphs !  I do nothing in all my writing other than double space, always.  This site is horridly difficult, impossible, see what it just did to my post, when I simply pressed the enter button, normally, to achieve double spacing.  Wow, such an absolutistic reaction to failure to double space; so here I am again, in a bind with someone who has been wonderful to me because he thinks I am purposely fucking with him when, in this instance, I was using the keyboard normally, and, the resultant is what you see.  Negatio.

(September 3, 2018 at 7:13 pm)Haipule Wrote: Authority without freedom is tyranny(Nazi shit, Shari'a shit, religious shit). Freedom without law(authority) is anarchy(Hippy shit).

Haipule Wrote:Freedom without law(authority) is anarchy
"Law" is inauthoritative authority, i.e., a series of jurisprudents pretending to be in authority in a given nation, while, in fact, they mistakenly think their law is efficient to motivate persons to do, or not do, prescribed and proscribed things; when, in fact. law per se, i.e., the language of law, has no efficacy among men.  That which has efficacy is all the men with clubs and guns and jails which uphold a language of law, which, in itself, cannot cause, or move anyone to do anything. '
Immediately after the American revolutionary war, after the American colonialists had won their war against the British, there was no government, no law.  Nonetheless, Thomas Paine, the person who is famous for making a midnight ride yelling "The British are coming !" reports, in his little book "Common Sense",  that at that time there was no strife, no anarchy, because, the requirements of normal daily commerce among persons lent civility to interpersonal interaction.  Given Paine's actual historical report of the state of affairs when law was absent, is powerful evidence that an absence of law does not absolutely mean anarchy !  Isn't that fantastic ?! Negatio.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Quote:see what it just did to my post, when I simply pressed the enter button, normally, to achieve double spacing. Wow, such an absolutistic reaction to failure to double space; so here I am again, in a bind with someone who has been wonderful to me because he thinks I am purposely fucking with him when, in this instance, I was using the keyboard normally, and, the resultant is what you see.

Lol, okay. There is NO way this guy isn’t fucking with us.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 3, 2018 at 8:01 pm)negatio Wrote:
emjay Wrote:I just meant 'old' in the sense of 'not modern'... not 'tech savvy'... more likely to be surrounded by books and records than computers and smartphones.
Records ?!  I have not seen a record in decades, and my last album was the White Album by the Beatles.  I had records as a boy, but none are around here.  I have four desktops awaiting me finding the time to trouble shoot and repair them, I employ two smartphones constantly, and a third needs a new battery.

I was just now simply trying to please Abaddon, and use double spacing, and what you see is the mess that was simply the result of hitting the enter key twice, and that is all that it is;----I am not acting in pursuit of some clandestine acts whereby I am attempting to place everyone in a schizophrenogenic double bind, and, make fools of you, and all that absurd nonsense. Jesus fucking Christ !

Of course I have a small series of theoretical works, i.e., books which I peruse and or read intently for days on end.
I am plenty tech savvy when it comes to repairing computers and overcoming software problems.

Yes, you have been beautiful to me, just beautiful.  It absolutely astonishes me that both you and Abaddon are throwing me away on account of double spacing, paragraphs !  I do nothing in all my writing other than double space, always.  This site is horridly difficult, impossible, see what it just did to my post, when I simply pressed the enter button, normally, to achieve double spacing.  Wow, such an absolutistic reaction to failure to double space; so here I am again, in a bind with someone who has been wonderful to me because he thinks I am purposely fucking with him when, in this instance, I was using the keyboard normally, and, the resultant is what you see.  Negatio.

Look, I'm sorry I was abrupt, but I just don't have the patience for this... I thought I did, but clearly I don't. It would be different if I was standing over your shoulder and could thus physically point to things etc, but trying to teach this stuff without the benefit of visual aids is nigh on impossible... and we could be here for weeks trying to get anywhere.

As to the rest I don't care whether you use double spacing or not, but I've just looked it up and I think I know what might be the root of the problem here. You keep saying you're using the Enter button to create double spaces and I didn't know what you were talking about, since in my world the 'Enter' button and 'Return' button are somewhat synonymous and most of the time do the same thing; create a carriage return line feed, as in like on a typewriter; that is the cursor moves from wherever it is to the beginning of the next line.

But from Googling it, there is a precedent for the Enter button creating doublespaces, both in Microsoft and LibreOffice. So I'm guessing that's what's going on here... ie do you use the Enter button for double-spaces in either Microsoft Office... probably Microsoft Word... or LibreOffice? It would make sense for those programs... word processors... to have that feature because they can be used for writing formal, printable letters... which often would use the double-spacing custom, both for paragraph indentation and after full stops, so it would make sense to have a shortcut key for them. I can't test it cos I don't have Microsoft Office or LibreOffice, or for that matter an Enter button on my laptop keyboard Wink only a Return button, but my guess is that this is what is causing the problem for you. Suffice it to say then that if this is the case, you should stop using the Enter button to create double spaces on this site, because this site doesn't have that feature; it just does the default thing with the Enter button; create a carriage return line feed, just the same as the Return button. So in other words, if you want double spaces, you'll just have to press the Space Bar twice.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
The ‘patience of a saint’ award goes to Emjay. 😁
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 3, 2018 at 9:34 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: The ‘patience of a saint’ award goes to Emjay. 😁

hehe. I guess I just enjoy a challenge... moth to a flame Wink
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The classic ontological argument Modern Atheism 20 814 October 3, 2024 at 12:45 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The modal ontological argument for God Disagreeable 29 1434 August 10, 2024 at 8:57 pm
Last Post: CuriosityBob
  My own moral + ontological argument. Mystic 37 12264 April 17, 2018 at 12:50 pm
Last Post: FatAndFaithless
  Ontological Limericks chimp3 12 3702 December 22, 2016 at 3:22 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  On Anselm's 2nd Formulation of the Ontological Argument FallentoReason 7 3439 November 21, 2016 at 10:57 am
Last Post: FallentoReason
  How would you describe your ontological views? The Skeptic 10 3229 July 29, 2014 at 11:28 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Ontological Arguments - A Comprehensive Refutation MindForgedManacle 23 6328 March 20, 2014 at 1:48 am
Last Post: Rabb Allah
  The Modal Ontological Argument - Without Modal Logic Rational AKD 82 34529 February 17, 2014 at 9:36 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  The modal ontological argument - without modal logic proves atheism max-greece 15 5848 February 14, 2014 at 1:32 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  The Ontological Argument MindForgedManacle 18 6747 August 22, 2013 at 3:45 pm
Last Post: Jackalope



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)