Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 5, 2024, 11:54 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ontological Disproof of God
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Page 69!
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Oh shit! Missed it.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
That's what she said?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 10, 2018 at 1:09 pm)Khemikal Wrote: That's what she said?

Indeed. "Take off your glasses LP, you're scratching my legs" --> "Put on your glasses you are licking the grass".

Kinda like that. Rolleyes
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 9, 2018 at 3:00 am)negatio Wrote: No, you are incorrect. I studied-up on the third person.  It is proper to refer to a persona in the third person, because the persona, in this instance, Negatio, really has nothing to do with the writing.

Those that refer to themselves in third person are mostly people that have nothing to show for.

May I remind you that you are a guest in this forum, that your presence here is allowed wilst whithin the forum rules. You were warned of your disruptive behaviour. The purpose of a warning is to exactly do that, that a member has run afoul of the forum rules, to give an opportunity to those that want to correct their misshappen. Those that do not, eventually, terminate at a permanent ban from this site. Is this your purpose here?

If you do not like this place, why do you stay here? Is your philosophy so weak, that you are paused for simple replies?
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Shit, grabbed a thesaurus to do that last one. FFS try thinking in porttuguese and write it in English. It would have much many curse words.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 10, 2018 at 1:52 pm)LastPoet Wrote:
(September 9, 2018 at 3:00 am)negatio Wrote: No, you are incorrect. I studied-up on the third person.  It is proper to refer to a persona in the third person, because the persona, in this instance, Negatio, really has nothing to do with the writing.

Those that refer to themselves in third person are mostly people that have nothing to show for.

May I remind you that you are a guest in this forum, that your presence here is allowed wilst whithin the forum rules. You were warned of your disruptive behaviour. The purpose of a warning is to exactly do that, that a member has run afoul of the forum rules, to give an opportunity to those that want to correct their misshappen. Those that do not, eventually, terminate at a permanent ban from this site. Is this your purpose here?

If you do not like this place, why do you stay here? Is your philosophy so weak, that you are paused for simple replies?


You have things ass-backwards. I was not merely warned, I was punished, and, this punishment was administered while my code was far far better than ever, having only an extra space or so, which is partly ascribable to incorrect information/confusing information provided by staff

What does "'nothing to show for'mean ?

Replies do not correlate to philosophy;  it is simply that my code IQ is 0.00001, and philosophy IQ closer to 200. I ran afoul of rules under conditions wherein I was constantly, non-stop, being harassed and INSULTED by forum members, which, I come to find is a no no way to treat Newbies; review the record, see how I was treated, while being whipsawed by factions simultaneously giving contradictory advice on proper code; in addition it constitutes a systematically misleading double-speak to address someone while using the same term to refer to two different processes, all of which constituted a stressful schizophrenogenic double bind, wherein I was confused and my personality was drifting into a split, thus the appearance of incorrectly self-referencing.
Your mode of addressing me is precisely insulting. No I don't like it around here, I have been severely misused by a multitude of hateful and insulting people who see trolls coming out of the walls, totally psycho bullshit misapplied to a person coming aboard for the sake of engaging in dialogical dialectic, which dialectic is the raison de etre for staying in an absolute hell of member misconduct, even staff was/is insulting via thisl destructive troll paranoia. I do not leave anywhere simply because some flippant chicken-shit like you demands it !  Negatio
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
[Image: 87d168c3-a7e9-4525-9b10-f177b24b5ef7_750x469.jpg]
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
You were warned. How exactly were you punished further than a simple warning?
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
This is tiring
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.

[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  My own moral + ontological argument. Mystic 37 11264 April 17, 2018 at 12:50 pm
Last Post: FatAndFaithless
  Ontological Limericks chimp3 12 3336 December 22, 2016 at 3:22 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  On Anselm's 2nd Formulation of the Ontological Argument FallentoReason 7 3197 November 21, 2016 at 10:57 am
Last Post: FallentoReason
  How would you describe your ontological views? The Skeptic 10 2839 July 29, 2014 at 11:28 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Ontological Arguments - A Comprehensive Refutation MindForgedManacle 23 5672 March 20, 2014 at 1:48 am
Last Post: Rabb Allah
  The Modal Ontological Argument - Without Modal Logic Rational AKD 82 31797 February 17, 2014 at 9:36 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  The modal ontological argument - without modal logic proves atheism max-greece 15 5123 February 14, 2014 at 1:32 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  The Ontological Argument MindForgedManacle 18 6254 August 22, 2013 at 3:45 pm
Last Post: Jackalope
  Plantiga's ontological argument. Mystic 31 8170 April 25, 2013 at 5:43 pm
Last Post: A_Nony_Mouse
  Why ontological arguments are illogical liam 51 28590 August 14, 2012 at 8:06 pm
Last Post: Angrboda



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)