Ontological Disproof of God

[Mister Agenda]

Yea...you have no proof that staff or any other member has broken any rules. That’s because it didn’t happen.

Negatio's thread is a living record of all that was said; the thread is alike a blockchain, it is an indubitable record of what happened in the past.

When Staff ignored, and was indifferent to the fact of my being intently insulted, the fact that they did nothing about it, constitutes what is known as a negative act, whereby one is considered guilty precisely by doing nothing about a given situation.

Staff, including yourself, broke the forum rule against insulting newbies by being indifferent to the fact that big-time insult was transpiring, wherein you, yourself, participated by calling me a troll, and by saying that you were now sure that I am a troll ! I really don't give a damn what you did; I forgive you. I merely want you attain to a realization that Staff/You were doing insult to a Newbie. Proof !  Hell, total proof is looking you directly in the face on the thread whereupon the newbie insulting transpired !  Negatio.

Did you report any of the posts in which you were insulted?

[negatio]

And now you are being intentionally dishonest. We have exchanged no private messages since the point at which I washed my hands of you. This will continue to be the case. You not only burned the bridges, you drained the river afterwards just out of obtuseness.

Bullshit, I am never intentionally dishonest. I am completely authentic, and, that authenticity is a part of what pisses you off.  It does not matter when we exchanged private mails, we did exchange mails.

All members and all staff which participated in so radically insulting me as a newbie ought, really, to write-yourselves all up for committing crimes against your own damned fucking inefficacious law, and, collectively, throw youselves all off the forum, for Christ's sake !  Negatio.

[The Grand Nudger]

It's possible for you to be authentically mistaken, lol. Rather than wasting your time telling members and staff what they ought to be doing..perhaps you ought to be working on your argument? I think you'll find that doing this would rehabilitate your image better than another dozen pages of bitchy whinefest.

[Losty]

And now you are being intentionally dishonest. We have exchanged no private messages since the point at which I washed my hands of you. This will continue to be the case. You not only burned the bridges, you drained the river afterwards just out of obtuseness.

Bullshit, I am never intentionally dishonest. I am completely authentic, and, that authenticity is a part of what pisses you off.  It does not matter when we exchanged private mails, we did exchange mails.

All members and all staff which participated in so radically insulting me as a newbie ought, really, to write-yourselves all up for committing crimes against you own damned fucking inefficacious law, cpllectively, throw youselves all off the forum, for Christ's sake !  Negatio.

Insulting is not against the rules. This isn’t that hard to understand.

[Angrboda]

Otherwise known as confirmation bias. It sucks... especially to be on the wrong end of it... but unfortunately it is a part of human nature. Going forward you can either continue to lash out, whether justified or not, and continue to reinforce that perception, or you can aim to break the cycle, for instance, as Losty suggested, by introducing yourself in the Introductions forum.

Have I been radically intently insulted for the past three weeks ?  Yes or No.  Yes.  So, you will not disallow me writing a description of a methodology of insult employed by staff and members in the name of a myyside ascription.

I am simply going to describe staff and members as they have constantly addressed me via insult THE INSULT THAT IS AGAINST STAFF's very OWN LAW, to which staff and members have exhibited a complete indifference and, then prroceed to  accuse me of breaking their law, while they break their own law, big time. ; an unethically duplicitous conduct.  A totally radically ugly state of affairs wherein forum law is being ignored/broken, i.e., the forum law against insulting newbies.  Do not attempt to worm out of me positing a description of the horrid state of affairs transpiring within the forume, by members breaking, with relish, their own fucking law !  I have taken my licks here, even up to the point of a Kafkaesque punishment of having my life span here reduced, absent a hearing, by 25%, while being denied the possibility for talking back to the horrid, destructive, inauthoritative authorities of the forum, without exhibiting confirmation of my being a criminal in your midst.  Remember the Sean Connery film "Zardoff"', where punishment was to be artificially  aged a certain number of years ?  Yea, sure, now it is "confirmation bias" which plagues me, no, it is the pure criminal conduct of staff/members in a total indifference to their own law, which underpins my apparent maladaptation here.  The conduct of staff/and members is so radically ignoble and unethical and, unlawful, and has so very alienated me, that I am no longer interested in attempting a noble and civil interaction with staff/members .Emjay, you are one of the few who has been decent, not inhuman.
Law is the grandest, most successful ongoing, most radically destructive con which man has ever devised, and, I see right through ''law'' as not being an honest means to attaining human  civilization, law is a dishonesty; an ignobility; a CON. The forum is employing atheism as an excuse for conducting themselves as absolute barbarians.  Forum wants to continually deny me the language which I have seen to be requisite to describing the law con, which denial is unfathomably fucking stupid; always demanding some other language; some other simplicity; some other Duane, all properly make over in their criminally ill image.

I thought if staff/members might allow me to describe them, so that they might gain some realization of how fucking twisted and cruel they are to others, we might, subsequently, kiss and make up, and then, return to other considerations...So, if you are not interested in an auteur writing a free portrait of your Forum, just say so; however, I may just continue to get it all out of my system...Negatio

I thought the radical freedom provided by double nihilation meant that law and ordinary circumstance was ineffectual in determining your fate, that via the double nihilation, man could rise above such things? You seem to be refuting your own argument by your very actions. If double nihilation really does offer an escape from facticity and ordinary circumstance, then this song and dance of yours is nothing but bullshit.

[The Grand Nudger]

Add it to the growing list of things he's not radically free to do.

[negatio]

Bullshit, I am never intentionally dishonest. I am completely authentic, and, that authenticity is a part of what pisses you off.  It does not matter when we exchanged private mails, we did exchange mails.

All members and all staff which participated in so radically insulting me as a newbie ought, really, to write-yourselves all up for committing crimes against you own damned fucking inefficacious law, cpllectively, throw youselves all off the forum, for Christ's sake !  Negatio.

Insulting is not against the rules. This isn’t that hard to understand.

Kit and KevinM1 sent me a copy of forum law positing against insulting newbies; Kit and Kevin probably did not counterfeit the language of the law, (which is beautifully written), like when Khemikal faked the presence of a Jihadist Muslim on my thread, which was pretty scary harassment/insult.
Negatio

[Angrboda]

All members and all staff which participated in so radically insulting me as a newbie ought, really, to write-yourselves all up for committing crimes against your own damned fucking inefficacious law, and, collectively, throw youselves all off the forum, for Christ's sake !  Negatio.

If you feel that a member of this forum, staff included, has violated the forum rules, then you need to click on the "report" button for that post and make an official complaint about that post. Alternatively, you can start a thread in the "Questions for staff" section of the forum, click here. Only you and staff will be able to see what transpires in that thread.

If you don't report anything, staff is not going to take any action. Members are responsible for bringing rule violations and problems to the attention of staff. It is not the responsibility of staff to monitor threads looking for behavior which warrants intervention. If you don't report it, and nothing happens, you have only yourself to blame.

Moreover, it is considered inappropriate to address such rule violations by arguing about them in a thread. The staff will not take action on accusations lodged against others in a forum post, with the exception of the "Questions for staff" section mentioned above. There's no rule about talking about rule violations in a thread, but it is considered bad form to do that instead of reporting the behavior to staff through the proper channels.

[The Grand Nudger]

Insulting is not against the rules. This isn’t that hard to understand.

Kit and KevinM1 sent me a copy of forum law positing against insulting newbies; Kit and Kevin probably did not counterfeit the language of the law, (which is beautifully written), like when Khemikal faked the presence of a Jihadist Muslim on my thread, which was pretty scary harassment/insult.
Negatio

LOL, Pro 10/10. What if I told you that I was every single poster in this thread..except you?

[Mister Agenda]

Insulting is not against the rules. This isn’t that hard to understand.

Kit and KevinM1 sent me a copy of forum law positing against insulting newbies; Kit and Kevin probably did not counterfeit the language of the law, (which is beautifully written), like when Khemikal faked the presence of a Jihadist Muslim on my thread, which was pretty scary harassment/insult.
Negatio

Were you insulted in your intro thread...or did you not make one?