Ontological Disproof of God

[Silver]

I am too sensitive to bear Pandemonium's scary; intimidating; condescending; absolutistic and tyrannical posture toward me.  I am afraid of the generally unpleasant aura P. exudes, therefore, I am fearful of viewing all communications from her. Is there a forum rule advising me that I must subject my pyche  to staff's nauseating and overbearing absolutistic tyranny ?
Are you are telling me the post contains answer to my question regarding systematically misleading doublespeak ?  If so, I don't know; perhaps it might be worth going into a particular hell to obtain the information...I actually hesitate to engage unpleasant dictators. Negatio

Being obtuse suits you.

[Losty]

Your question in the thread you made was answered by Pandemonium, you admitted earlier that you haven’t even read it.


You say you’re going to ask staff to make a ruling. What do you want a ruling on?

I am too sensitive to bear Pandemonium's scary; intimidating; condescending; absolutistic and tyrannical posture toward me.  I am afraid of the generally unpleasant aura P. exudes, therefore, I am fearful of viewing all communications from her. Is there a forum rule advising me that I must subject my pyche  to staff's nauseating and overbearing absolutistic tyranny ?
Are you are telling me the post contains answer to my question regarding systematically misleading doublespeak ?  If so, I don't know; perhaps it might be worth going into a particular hell to obtain the information...I actually hesitate to engage unpleasant dictators. Negatio

Actually I think he was quite professional and the post does answer your question.

Here’s the thing, you’re out here saying to everyone that staff have refused to answer your question, when in reality it has been answered and you have refused to read the answer. That is called lying. You can lie if you want to but if you lie about staff, don’t think we won’t call you out on it.

[Angrboda]

Your question in the thread you made was answered by Pandemonium, you admitted earlier that you haven’t even read it.


You say you’re going to ask staff to make a ruling. What do you want a ruling on?

I am too sensitive to bear Pandemonium's scary; intimidating; condescending; absolutistic and tyrannical posture toward me.  I am afraid of the generally unpleasant aura P. exudes, therefore, I am fearful of viewing all communications from her. Is there a forum rule advising me that I must subject my pyche  to staff's nauseating and overbearing absolutistic tyranny ?
Are you are telling me the post contains answer to my question regarding systematically misleading doublespeak ?  If so, I don't know; perhaps it might be worth going into a particular hell to obtain the information...I actually hesitate to engage unpleasant dictators. Negatio

Okay, now you really are acting like a troll.

[Whateverist]

Think he'll make it to a 100 pages? I long to see a line through his name. Please God .. make it go away.

[negatio]

No, I am not intentionally lying. Whenever I look at the private thread it always display 2 responses, which were both Losty. What I am referring to that I have not responded to are two of Pandaeonium's posts on the open thread.
Losty, you are so very quick to continually accuse me of lying, when, in fact, there is some other issue involved; nonetheless , it is crystal clear that staff has formed a project to ban me by 25% increments.

[Losty]

No, I am not intentionally lying.  Whenever I look at the private thread it always display 2 responses, which were both Losty.  What I am referring to that I have not responded to are two of Pandaeonium's posts on the open thread.
Losty, you are so very quick to continually accuse me of lying, when, in fact, there is some other issue involved; nonetheless , it is crystal clear that staff has formed a project to ban me by 25% increments.

There is no private thread where I have responded.

When a new person comes in and is for sure a troll or a spammer we just ban them instantly with no warnings no chances no nothing. If we wanted to do that with you we could have banned you after your first post. But we didn’t, because we weren’t sure you were trolling. We have given you warnings for rule violations, which are just that, warnings. So long as you do not continue to violate rules you will not be banned. So let it go and continue on with your thread about the ontological disproof of god.

[brewer]

Insistently address one via insult Kelso.  Rule/law, same difference Losty.  It does not matter what we call whaaat the owners are saying, for, they are saying NO insult on the forum.  Members are now so spoiled by lenience regarding their methodology of insult that, members absolutely refuse to obey forum law against insult...members, incapable of anything than insult cannot civilly, rationally discuss OP, they can only insult the OP and, cannot in fact posit a rational anti-thesis.  I was pursuing a dialogical dialectical examination of my argument against Deity, when, all I get, is insult; dialogical dialectic does not, cannot proceed by insult; members only capable of enunciating insult and mere opinion; Vulcanlogician, a rational person will not visit this thread for all the ugly insultative interpersonal interaction transpiring herein.

Yes, Kelso, stick to insults presented via pure assertion, which constitute the very lowest form of human thinking, I. e.  mere opinion.  Keep your goddamn mere non-professional opinions regarding my psychological structure to yourself.  I have gone to court employing my language; they thought I was nuts; was referred for certification by a psychologist; was determined to be a theoretically oriented, optimistic, sensitive person in possession of a superior IQ in the variable range; the  court shut the fuck up on the question of my mentality, complimented me for passing their test with flying colors, and, the proceedings continued.  I am a certified superior intelligence.  San Jose, CA Superior Court circa 1980. Check it out, bigmouth big shot Kelso.  Contact the Superior court.  My full name is Duane Clinton Meehan; dob o6/08/1945; Caucasian; 6' tall; 175 pounds; scar lower left quadrant of back; no tattoos.

Quite a few years have passed since 1980 and now. I doubt the results of that exam is now considered valid. 

The fact that the court found is necessary to subject you to the mental examination process may be more telling than anything. And I doubt the court certified you of anything other than you possess(ed) the mental capability to assist in your case. 

Please explain superior IQ in the variable range. Is sounds like aggrandizement. Something you exhibit often. 

Your behavior here and IRL may be very different, we only know you from here. Based on your behavior here, you definitely have some mental issues. My conclusion is narcissistic personality disorder. I doubt you'll believe it, most narcissists don't when confronted. 

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-cond...c-20366662

Read it.

[negatio]

Losty,
We need sort out the "troll'' insult. I have just posted something on the insult in the special thread.

I cannot go back to considerations regarding my theories while under the constant and horrid ongoing insult that is being constantly, mistakenly, deemed a troll ! Negatio.

[The Grand Nudger]

Yet another item on the growing list of things you're not radically free to do?  : shrugs :

[Whateverist]

Losty,
We need sort out the "troll'' insult.  I have just posted something on the insult in the special thread.

I cannot go back to considerations regarding my theories while under the constant and horrid ongoing insult that is being constantly, mistakenly, deemed a troll ! Negatio.

Oh well.  No one can expect you to work under these conditions.  Can't say you didn't try though.  Your posts were monumental.  But nothing is worth this kind of disrespect.  Go now, with your dignity intact.  Please.