Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 1, 2024, 12:29 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ontological Disproof of God
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 13, 2018 at 7:41 pm)negatio Wrote: I can see it now: Abaddon the Sweet.

Boru, Losty, I just said, Nuff said. Ya-all are bringing it up again. I'm done with the topic;  Jormungandr stepped-in and assisted in the proper explication of the rule.. Losty, do not order me about as if I were your peon, that shit does not work with an American, and just gets one's ire up.  Will you ever learn to be sweet at all times to new members ? Oh, Losty, you are so so sweet, just a little sweetie pie...Negatio

Jerkoff sorry bout your luck, cupcake
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Anyway, moving on.

Khem, jorm, someone who isn’t too busy, will someone please explain the OP to me in dumb person terms so I can form an opinion on it. Smile
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 13, 2018 at 6:06 pm)negatio Wrote: If it is incorrect to maintain no insult is permitted on the site, please boil why down into a nutshell, why ? Because the wording of Sentence three is clear to me, why is the meaning seen, by staff and members, in an entirely opposite way ?  And, I am not being purposefully obtuse !  Negatio

The problem is you're looking at that sentence alone without reference to anything else; ie you're not seeing it in the context of the rules as a whole;

1. It is defined elsewhere in the rules what constitutes unacceptable interpersonal behaviour; eg trolling and flaming.
2. Carte blanche means 'blank cheque' or 'free hand'... that is, with context in square brackets "Note: that this does not give you a carte blanche to act in an insulting or rude manner in other areas of the forums [ie with impunity from the normal rules for dealing with unacceptable behaviour, as defined elsewhere in the rules... eg trolling and flaming].
3. And where the first part of the rules for the Introductions forum is saying essentially that the threshold is lowered... so elsewhere in the forum it would require trolling and/or flaming to merit staff action, but in the Introductions forum, even rude and insulting behaviour that does not rise to the level of trolling/flaming will not be tolerated.

The rules allow for the fact that people get angry and arguments can get heated, and in that context, insults can fly... that's just part of being human. It's when it goes too far, or doesn't add anything to the discussion, that it starts to head into trolling/flaming territory, and requires staff action.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 13, 2018 at 6:31 pm)Losty Wrote: Because you don’t know the difference between “please try” and “you must”...


You keep wanting to be helpful when he is dead set on being imperious and indignant.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 13, 2018 at 8:34 pm)Whateverist Wrote:
(September 13, 2018 at 6:31 pm)Losty Wrote: Because you don’t know the difference between “please try” and “you must”...


You keep wanting to be helpful when he is dead set on being imperious and indignant.

I keep bouncing back and forth between being helpful and being a dick lol. It’s hard not to get frustrated though. I especially don’t like being condescended to and told I should be sweet. It’s almost as bad as when random men tell me I’d be prettier if I smiled. Like, fuck you dude. Lol.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 13, 2018 at 7:29 pm)Losty Wrote: You already received an official staff ruling on this matter, as per your request. There will be no further explanations for you. Get back to the topic of the thread.


Yeah, I hate hearing all this whimpering and bitching about the unfair, irrational staff and rules.  Somebody get this guy some big boy panties already.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Losty
What luck was that ?
Positivio
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 13, 2018 at 8:38 pm)Whateverist Wrote:
(September 13, 2018 at 7:29 pm)Losty Wrote: You already received an official staff ruling on this matter, as per your request. There will be no further explanations for you. Get back to the topic of the thread.


Yeah, I hate hearing all this whimpering and bitching about the unfair, irrational staff and rules.  Somebody get this guy some big boy panties already.
*my italics*

Great, man, now I’ve gotta go visit another site... I’ll be back, save my spot.
[Image: bbb59Ce.gif]

(September 17, 2015 at 4:04 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: I make change in the coin tendered. If you want courteous treatment, behave courteously. Preaching at me and calling me immoral is not courteous behavior.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 13, 2018 at 8:37 pm)Losty Wrote:
(September 13, 2018 at 8:34 pm)Whateverist Wrote: You keep wanting to be helpful when he is dead set on being imperious and indignant.

I keep bouncing back and forth between being helpful and being a dick lol. It’s hard not to get frustrated though. I especially don’t like being condescended to and told I should be sweet. It’s almost as bad as when random men tell me I’d be prettier if I smiled. Like, fuck you dude. Lol.

The thing is this, if the situations were reversed, neggy would be saying "No, look, it says I can right here. Your law has empowered me. You're just to ignorant to understand.". 

And he has played that card in the past.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 13, 2018 at 8:40 pm)negatio Wrote: Losty
What luck was that ?
Positivio

The phrase “sorry bout your luck” is sometimes used to tell someone they’re not going to get what they want. In this case I was referring to me being sweet. I am sweet when I want to be but I am not required to be sweet.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  My own moral + ontological argument. Mystic 37 11326 April 17, 2018 at 12:50 pm
Last Post: FatAndFaithless
  Ontological Limericks chimp3 12 3366 December 22, 2016 at 3:22 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  On Anselm's 2nd Formulation of the Ontological Argument FallentoReason 7 3225 November 21, 2016 at 10:57 am
Last Post: FallentoReason
  How would you describe your ontological views? The Skeptic 10 2875 July 29, 2014 at 11:28 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Ontological Arguments - A Comprehensive Refutation MindForgedManacle 23 5774 March 20, 2014 at 1:48 am
Last Post: Rabb Allah
  The Modal Ontological Argument - Without Modal Logic Rational AKD 82 31932 February 17, 2014 at 9:36 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  The modal ontological argument - without modal logic proves atheism max-greece 15 5203 February 14, 2014 at 1:32 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  The Ontological Argument MindForgedManacle 18 6300 August 22, 2013 at 3:45 pm
Last Post: Jackalope
  Plantiga's ontological argument. Mystic 31 8209 April 25, 2013 at 5:43 pm
Last Post: A_Nony_Mouse
  Why ontological arguments are illogical liam 51 28706 August 14, 2012 at 8:06 pm
Last Post: Angrboda



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)