Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 5:25 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?
RE: Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?
(January 1, 2019 at 8:36 pm)Angelina Wrote: I agree with you that the energy of the universe has always existed, but in order for that energy to create anything, God is required. 


Saying god did it is not very satisfying because it does not explain:
What process did god use?
Where did got get the "stuff"
How did it do anything with no time/space to exist in?
Where is the evidence for all the above?

So you see just saying "magic man done it" in no way answers any questions and raises the stakes because it has to explain not only all the same stuff as a natural cause but has to explain something hyper unlikely like a gods existence.

(January 1, 2019 at 8:36 pm)Angelina Wrote:  I believe that that we are so complex, we require a creator, not just the universe itself. God is an eternal self existing being with no beginning or end. I understand nature perfectly well.

Well then you believe wrong.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
RE: Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
RE: Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?
Angelina,

Why do radioactive elements decay? Why one atom as opposed to another? Why also is the half life of a free neutron around 10 minutes?

Dawn
Reply
RE: Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
RE: Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?
(January 2, 2019 at 8:35 am)Amarok Wrote: Is he honestly trying to compare Spontaneous generation to Abiogenisis
In short: Yes
Thats how intellectually dishonest he is, but too be honest he already did worse, so its no big deal anymore at this point.

I am wondering this troll still doesnt get banned after what...1000 pages of bullshit, while another new member was just banned because he fakes to be a christian as an introduction (which was strange but...also somewhat funny). He was banned after like 10 posts in total.

Anyhow, ill keep my Popcorn stockpiled up and watch how the intellectual garbage keeps piling up.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
Reply
RE: Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?
(January 2, 2019 at 8:35 am)Amarok Wrote:
(January 2, 2019 at 6:42 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Well done!  You now know the difference between the non-existent 'Law of Biogenesis' and the well-established 'Theory of Biogenesis'.

Please consider this a personal growth moment.

Boru
Is he honestly trying to compare Spontaneous generation to Abiogenisis

Yes, he is.  Spontaneous generation is the discredited notion that living organisms arise from non-living matter. Abiogenesis is the non-discredited notion that inorganic compounds can produce protolife.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
RE: Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?
Reply
RE: Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?
Reply
RE: Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?
(January 2, 2019 at 8:08 am)Jehanne Wrote: Angelina,

Why do radioactive elements decay?  Why one atom as opposed to another?  Why also is the half life of a free neutron around 10 minutes?

Dawn

May I ask what these questions have to do with Christianity or evidence of God? I can link you to the answers, but I am more interested in understanding what you think the importance of these things are?
Reply
RE: Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?
(January 2, 2019 at 2:14 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:
(January 2, 2019 at 6:42 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Well done!  You now know the difference between the non-existent 'Law of Biogenesis' and the well-established 'Theory of Biogenesis'.

Please consider this a personal growth moment.

Boru

It used to be more common to say "Law of Biogenesis"  Regardless, we know it as being factual, so you we can just say "biogenesis" as far as that goes.  The concept stands on its own and can't logically be refuted.

You understand biogenesis about as much as you understand the conservation of mass.  Which is to say, not at all.  But the principle of biogenesis doesn't negate the possibility of abiogenesis.  Study up.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  What is the Evidence for Atheism? FrancisXavier 15 928 September 26, 2026 at 12:41 pm
Last Post: awty
  Veridical NDEs: Evidence/Proof of the Soul and the After-Life? Nishant Xavier 34 10192 July 17, 2024 at 7:34 am
Last Post: awty
  Do you have any interest in the philosophies of introflection pioneered by Buddhism? Authari 67 17515 January 12, 2024 at 7:12 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Nishant Xavier 38 10929 August 7, 2023 at 10:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  When were the Gospels Written? The External and Internal Evidence. Nishant Xavier 62 15183 August 6, 2023 at 10:25 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Isaiah 53, 700 B.C: Historical Evidence of the Divine Omniscience. Nishant Xavier 91 21865 August 6, 2023 at 2:19 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Mike Litorus owns god without any verses no one 3 1620 July 9, 2023 at 7:13 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God. Nishant Xavier 162 41812 July 9, 2023 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning. Nishant Xavier 54 14130 July 8, 2023 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Why the resurrection accounts are not evidence LinuxGal 5 2571 October 29, 2022 at 2:01 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)