Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 26, 2024, 3:26 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Was sin necessary for knowledge?
#71
RE: Was sin necessary for knowledge?
I think with animals, a lot of it is simply instinct driven... rather than an awareness of morality and striving to do the moral thing.

When we hear about a bear or a shark killing a person, we certainly don't hold that animal morally culpable for its action, the way we do when a human does it.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
#72
RE: Was sin necessary for knowledge?
Was sin necessary for knowledge? Depends on what it means to sin, and what kind of knowledge we are talking about. I mean, can babies sin? Animals? Are we talking experiential knowledge of good and evil? Or an "academic" sense of it?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Explain This #1: Belief vs. Knowledge GrandizerII 23 3160 January 16, 2018 at 6:55 am
Last Post: GrandizerII
  Peanut Gallery Thread for Explain This #1: Belief vs. Knowledge GrandizerII 22 3693 January 12, 2018 at 10:30 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Lately, there has not been much need for me to provide my knowledge Foxaèr 5 1427 June 16, 2017 at 9:29 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  No DHS necessary Rokcet Scientist 21 6346 March 20, 2012 at 2:54 am
Last Post: Rokcet Scientist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)