A.S.K. your way to proof.

[Drich]

bad analogies=analogies people like sungula have a very difficult time over turning.

bad analogies=analogies  people like Dirch use to make ineffective arguments that wouldn't persuade anyone and to which people like sangula are correct to point out .Fixed that for you . 

Again if this were the case... why bring it up? why show your hand? my truly offering bad analogies only helps you, telling me will only have me strengthen my approach. or better yet refocus my efforts on a different way of sharing my point.

 Truthfully other why bitch about something that makes your arguments stronger and easier to do? (Me offering bad analogies)

Pointing out something is not bitching.
[/quote]
again when there is no tactical reason for it, if this is just you compiling a list of my short comings, that is kinda the definition of bitching.

[Mister Agenda]

It should be called 'appeal to inappropriate authority'. An expert on a subject with a reputation for honesty can justifiably trusted to have good information on their topic of expertise, but they are not right because they are an authority, they are right because they put in the time to learn to understand the subject. You are justifiably trusting that they know what they are talking about because they earned their reputation.

Drich's method is a recipe for convincing yourself of anything you set out to convince yourself of; and if you do think you've made contact with his authority, all you've got is a voice in your head; and voices in your head do not have a reputation for honesty and subject matter expertise. You can use the same method to contact Vishnu or Athena; and whatever you think you've contacted YOU don't have the expertise to tell if it's real, just in your head, or something else.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Again if this were the case... why bring it up?

Too point it out 

 why show your hand?

What hand? This isn't poker

 my truly offering bad analogies only helps you,

Helps me do what?

 telling me will only have me strengthen my approach.

Good 

 or better yet refocus my efforts on a different way of sharing my point.

Good 

gain when there is no tactical reason for it, if this is just you compiling a list of my short comings, that is kinda the definition of bitching.

False .Someone can point out a shortfall of  something for no tactical reason and it not have it be bitching

[Bucky Ball]

Isn't creating content, and sparking interest and conversation enough?

LMAO. When did you plan on starting to do that ? 
You spew hatred and contempt. You do "retorts".
The only thing you *spark* is hatred of your ignorant religious shit. 

Please please please take me off probation. NOT. LOLOL
What a delusional idiot. There probably are pills for what ails you.

[Drich]

It should be called 'appeal to inappropriate authority'. An expert on a subject with a reputation for honesty can justifiably trusted to have good information on their topic of expertise, but they are not right because they are an authority, they are right because they put in the time to learn to understand the subject. You are justifiably trusting that they know what they are talking about because they earned their reputation.

Drich's method is a recipe for convincing yourself of anything you set out to convince yourself of; and if you do think you've made contact with his authority, all you've got is a voice in your head; and voices in your head do not have a reputation for honesty and subject matter expertise. You can use the same method to contact Vishnu or Athena; and whatever you think you've contacted YOU don't have the expertise to tell if it's real, just in your head, or something else.

if this is true, then why did Buddhism or Islam take when i set out to test those religions? Remember i started out with my mother as Buddhist.

---

Again if this were the case... why bring it up?

Too point it out 

but again why have me fix or take a way an advantage to you? it's not like you are tearing down my arguement by addressing the subject matter. look at this discussion. you only tactic is to attack me personally, so again why have me fix you only viable means of attack?

 why show your hand?

What hand? This isn't poker

i almost feel sorry for you.. your either pretty stupid or desperate to say anything as a come back. either way that comment reaks of desperation.

 my truly offering bad analogies only helps you,

Helps me do what?[/quote] fuel stupid little posts where you get to tell me about how bad my analogies are along with this not being poker. without that point of discussion none of this takes place.

 telling me will only have me strengthen my approach.

Good 

 or better yet refocus my efforts on a different way of sharing my point.

Good 

gain when there is no tactical reason for it, if this is just you compiling a list of my short comings, that is kinda the definition of bitching.

False .Someone can point out a shortfall of  something for no tactical reason and it not have it be bitching
[/quote] Sorry sport, but your ignorance of the word is shinning through here.
Bitching, (as it applies here):
verb (used without object)
Slang. to complain; gripe:
They bitched about the service, then about the bill.
2- To continuously complain about something

Without point or purpose your repeated notification become bitching.

---

Isn't creating content, and sparking interest and conversation enough?

LMAO. When did you plan on starting to do that ? 
You spew hatred and contempt. You do "retorts".
The only thing you *spark* is hatred of your ignorant religious shit. 

Please please please take me off probation. NOT. LOLOL
What a delusional idiot. There probably are pills for what ails you.

1

[Gwaithmir]

Isn't creating content, and sparking interest and conversation enough?

LMAO. When did you plan on starting to do that ? 
You spew hatred and contempt. You do "retorts".
The only thing you *spark* is hatred of your ignorant religious shit. 

Please please please take me off probation. NOT. LOLOL
What a delusional idiot. There probably are pills for what ails you.

Why not just put this troll on IGNORE and stop feeding him?

[Mister Agenda]

It should be called 'appeal to inappropriate authority'. An expert on a subject with a reputation for honesty can justifiably trusted to have good information on their topic of expertise, but they are not right because they are an authority, they are right because they put in the time to learn to understand the subject. You are justifiably trusting that they know what they are talking about because they earned their reputation.

Drich's method is a recipe for convincing yourself of anything you set out to convince yourself of; and if you do think you've made contact with his authority, all you've got is a voice in your head; and voices in your head do not have a reputation for honesty and subject matter expertise. You can use the same method to contact Vishnu or Athena; and whatever you think you've contacted YOU don't have the expertise to tell if it's real, just in your head, or something else.

if this is true, then why did Buddhism or Islam take when i set out to test those religions? Remember i started out with my mother as Buddhist.

This is what is known as an anecdote. Just because you wound up Christian doesn't mean the experience is typical of those who try it. Did you A/S/K Buddha first? Did he not answer? If so you did not try long enough or hard enough, eventually you'd have discovered Buddha is real.

This is the same standard you ask of us, to A/S/K for the rest of our lives or we find God, whichever comes first. Why didn't you use that standard with Buddha?

[The Architect Of Fate]

but again why have me fix or take a way an advantage to you? 

It would be good if you fixed it , And i couldn't care less about this so called advantage . As i said i'm not playing games .

it's not like you are tearing down my arguement by addressing the subject matter.

This assumes my goal is tear something down .Rather than simply pointing something out . If you choose to fix it well good for you .

 look at this discussion. you only tactic is to attack me personally,

Pointing your analogies are bad is not a personnel attack nor is pointing out your seeming love of using them  . You clearly looking at a very different conversation .

Einstein seemed to love using unrealistic and confusing analogies to express his ideas (pointing out something about  Einstein's methods not attacking him personally)

Einstein was a stupid moron who used shit analogies to push his retarded nonesense because he was a fucking jew (personnel attack )

Dich seems to love using bad analogies to express his ideas (pointing out something about Dirch's methods not attacking him personally))

Dirch was a stupid moron who used shit analogies to push his retarded nonesense because he was a fucking unitard  (personnel attack )

 so again why have me fix you only viable means of attack?

It would be good if you fixed it. I don't care about attacking at least not in this case .

 almost feel sorry for you.. your either pretty stupid or desperate to say anything as a come back. either way that comment reaks of desperation.

The point was i don't care about showing my hands because i'm not trying to play games with you , And this wasn't a comeback it was clearly a joke in response to you using the term hands .

Sorry sport, but your ignorance of the word is shinning through here.
Bitching, (as it applies here):
verb (used without object)
Slang. to complain; gripe:
They bitched about the servi
False .Someone can point out a shortfall of  something for no tactical reason and it not have it be bitching
ce, then about the bill.
2- To continuously complain about something



Without point or purpose your repeated notification become bitching.
Tut Tut

Sorry "Sport" 

Pointing out the shortfall that you make poor analogies is not  complaining it's pointing something out ,And i said no TACTICAL purpose .You can point out a fact without tactical reason but merely to point out the fact out and  doing so repeatedly is not bitching .So all you have done is quote a definition that doesn't apply to my comment.

To make the example apply to my comment 

They pointed out the food was undercooked .Then they pointed out the bills print wasn't legible.

Let's compare 

Sangula  pointed out Dirch makes terrible analogies that are ineffectual 

So to sum up my notifications to you pointing out the fact you make bad analogies is itself a point and a purpose .Even if i'm not doing it in some tactical ends .

So no tut tut to you

[Bucky Ball]

if this is true, then why did Buddhism or Islam take when i set out to test those religions? Remember i started out with my mother as Buddhist.

This is what is known as an anecdote. Just because you wound up Christian doesn't mean the experience is typical of those who try it. Did you A/S/K Buddha first? Did he not answer? If so you did not try long enough or hard enough, eventually you'd have discovered Buddha is real.

This is the same standard you ask of us, to A/S/K for the rest of our lives or we find God, whichever comes first. Why didn't you use that standard with Buddha?

One does not "try out" religions. 
Yet another example of how fucked up this fool is. 
If one does try-outs, then it's neither about faith or religion. 
Not only is this ignoramus not a Christian, he's not even a theist. 
He's an opportunist.

1

Is that how high can you count ? 
Oh wait, you can go up to 5 now. 
Great. 
Now you can start spelling lessons. 


I'm sure his Jebus is real pleased with his work here, insulting those he wants to convert.
Good going.

[Anomalocaris]

It should be called 'appeal to inappropriate authority'. An expert on a subject with a reputation for honesty can justifiably trusted to have good information on their topic of expertise, but they are not right because they are an authority, they are right because they put in the time to learn to understand the subject. You are justifiably trusting that they know what they are talking about because they earned their reputation.

Drich's method is a recipe for convincing yourself of anything you set out to convince yourself of; and if you do think you've made contact with his authority, all you've got is a voice in your head; and voices in your head do not have a reputation for honesty and subject matter expertise. You can use the same method to contact Vishnu or Athena; and whatever you think you've contacted YOU don't have the expertise to tell if it's real, just in your head, or something else.

if this is true, then why did Buddhism or Islam take when i set out to test those religions? Remember i started out with my mother as Buddhist.

---

Because you are even more unblessed than the millions of the less unblessed in whom those some what less contemptible creeds did take in happy preference to yours?

Pretty simple, really.     you must be really stupid to not see it.