Behading

[Deesse23]

Hitler (and Himmler) loved Islam, because its so agressive, unlike the catholic church.
He was so crazy and *uber racist* that he exempt almost all arab and muslims from propaganda and discrimination (because muslims were so formidable assisting him with Jews and other *westerners*, you know).

Adolf Hitler in 1942, during a staff meeting: "The only reliable ones are the muslims." He then repeated for the stenographer to pick up: "The only ones i trust are the Muslims!"

Amin el-Husseini





13. Waffen-Mountain-Division of the SS „Handžar“ consisted of 15.000 bosnian muslims, all volunteers. Note the scimitar on the collar and SS Skull on the cap

[WinterHold]

There's a huge difference between fictional killing of fictional people in movies and the murders of real people by the utter scum of ISIS.

Controversially, and most people here disagree with me, which is fair enough, but I support the death penalty for certain crimes.

I also support harsh sentences for some crimes but don't support the idea of mutilations. You steal from me and you deserve punishment, you don't deserve, however much I might say it at the time, to have your hand removed.

To make a society clear of robberies, the act of stealing must have a harsh consequence.
I stressed out that judgement's environment to have a council that judge, acting as the "jury". A jury of 10 or 20 people picked randomly in each case and the vote of each to carry out the sentence or not would make the mutilation sentence "more fair".

The Quran stated that the jury is essential in here:

Sura 42, The Quran:
https://quran.ksu.edu.sa/index.php?l=en#...rans=en_sh

( 38 )   And those who have responded to their lord and established prayer and whose affair is [determined by] consultation among themselves, and from what We have provided them, they spend.

The affair must be determined for a Muslim via consultation among other Muslims. So nobody would ever be sentenced in a just court without a jury -notice that this jury is explicitly defined by the word "among themselves"-.

Just so you know; this verse is enough to send all totalitarian systems to the garbage under Islam.

[The Grand Nudger]

Back to this bullshit? It doesn't work. Harsh penalties do not reduce crime. Quranic jurisprudence is as hilariously ignorant of factual reality as the rest of magic book.

Do you think that allah is the dummy who got it wrong, or could the guys who wrote magic book have had something to do with that?

[The Architect Of Fate]

To make a society clear of robberies, the act of stealing must have a harsh consequence.

It doesn't work 

I stressed out that judgement's environment to have a council that judge, acting as the "jury". A jury of 10 or 20 people picked randomly in each case and the
vote of each to carry out the sentence or not would make the mutilation sentence "more fair".

Regardless of how one comes too it . It doesn't work 

The Quran stated that the jury is essential in here:

Regardless of how one comes too it . It doesn't work 

The affair must be determined for a Muslim via consultation among other Muslims. So nobody would ever be sentenced in a just court without a jury -notice that this jury is explicitly defined by the word "among themselves"-.

Regardless of how one comes too it . It doesn't work 

Just so you know; this verse is enough to send all totalitarian systems to the garbage under Islam.

And yet Islam has continually produced totalitarian systems and allied with totalitarian systems 

[no one]

Why don't you share whatever it is that you're smoking?

Perhaps you're a chemist and you dipped into the synthetic Peyote once too often?

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

There's a huge difference between fictional killing of fictional people in movies and the murders of real people by the utter scum of ISIS.

Controversially, and most people here disagree with me, which is fair enough, but I support the death penalty for certain crimes.

I also support harsh sentences for some crimes but don't support the idea of mutilations. You steal from me and you deserve punishment, you don't deserve, however much I might say it at the time, to have your hand removed.

To make a society clear of robberies, the act of stealing must have a harsh consequence.
I stressed out that judgement's environment to have a council that judge, acting as the "jury". A jury of 10 or 20 people picked randomly in each case and the vote of each to carry out the sentence or not would make the mutilation sentence "more fair".

The Quran stated that the jury is essential in here:

Sura 42, The Quran:
https://quran.ksu.edu.sa/index.php?l=en#...rans=en_sh

( 38 )   And those who have responded to their lord and established prayer and whose affair is [determined by] consultation among themselves, and from what We have provided them, they spend.

The affair must be determined for a Muslim via consultation among other Muslims. So nobody would ever be sentenced in a just court without a jury -notice that this jury is explicitly defined by the word "among themselves"-.

Just so you know; this verse is enough to send all totalitarian systems to the garbage under Islam.

What Nudger said.  The way to reduce crime is to improve society, not to chop bits off of criminals.

Boru

[onlinebiker]

Why don't you share whatever it is that you're smoking?

Perhaps you're a chemist and you dipped into the synthetic Peyote once too often?

Don't blame the peyote. Nobody ever turned into a murderous flaming asshole by ingesting a few buttons....

That takes years of "religious training".

[Gawdzilla Sama]

I'm beginning to think that AllAss666 is looking to make Muslims look bad. Well done, boy, well done.

[Deesse23]

The islamist seems to operate under the false assumption that cruel punishment is ok when is institutionalized.
He is too ignorant to understand that chopping hands off is the problem, not the (lack) of jury.

What do you call someone who doesn't know the 101s of a civilized society? A barbarian!

[arewethereyet]

The islamist seems to operate under the false assumption that cruel punishment is ok when is institutionalized.
He is too ignorant to understand that chopping hands off is the problem, not the (lack) of jury.

What do you call someone who doesn't know the 101s of a civilized society? A barbarian!

Chopping off hands, stonings, flying jetliners into buildings, etc.  - perfectly acceptable as long as the Western terrorists aren't the ones doing it...apparently.