Explosion in Nashville this morning.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

You're trying too hard. He parked the RV next to his apartment for a week.

I must disagree. This assumes he believed people would link his ownership of the RV to him being the bomber.

He provided proof that he was the bomber, the larger bones survived the blast. Edge back from the absurd.

[onlinebiker]

I must disagree. This assumes he believed people would link his ownership of the RV to him being the bomber.

He provided proof that he was the bomber, the larger bones survived the blast. Edge back from the absurd.

Faulty logic there hoss.

If you find the homeowner's body in a house that was purposely set ablaze - would that prove the homeowner to be the arsonist?

[Gawdzilla Sama]

He provided proof that he was the bomber, the larger bones survived the blast. Edge back from the absurd.

Faulty logic there hoss.

If you find the homeowner's body in a house that was purposely set ablaze - would that prove the homeowner to be the arsonist?

Okay, to stifle another quibble, the body and the bulk of the rest of the evidence combine to provide convincing evidence that he was the sole perp.

[Angrboda]

Faulty logic there hoss.

If you find the homeowner's body in a house that was purposely set ablaze - would that prove the homeowner to be the arsonist?

Okay, to stifle another quibble, the body and the bulk of the rest of the evidence combine to provide convincing evidence that he was the sole perp.

I'm curious as to what you're referring to by other evidence, because the body itself is basically silent on that point.

[onlinebiker]

Faulty logic there hoss.

If you find the homeowner's body in a house that was purposely set ablaze - would that prove the homeowner to be the arsonist?

Okay, to stifle another quibble, the body and the bulk of the rest of the evidence combine to provide convincing evidence that he was the sole perp.

You realize this guy could have easily streamed this event live on the internet? 

Now granted - we don't have the evidence the LEOs have - but based on past similar events - a couple things remain puzzling.

1. If it was a straight up suicide - was there a note? Have not heard mention of such.

2. If it was a terrorist event - where is the manifesto? If you are blowing yourself up for a cause - wouldn't it get mentioned?

...

This guy might have been dead for two weeks before the bombing - and we wouldn't know - would we? (Toss the corpse in a deep freeze. It'll thaw in the explosion)

[Brian37]

Okay, to stifle another quibble, the body and the bulk of the rest of the evidence combine to provide convincing evidence that he was the sole perp.

You realize this guy could have easily streamed this event live on the internet? 

Now granted - we don't have the evidence the LEOs have - but based on past similar events - a couple things remain puzzling.

1. If it was a straight up suicide - was there a note? Have not heard mention of such.

2. If it was a terrorist event - where is the manifesto? If you are blowing yourself up for a cause - wouldn't it get mentioned?

...

This guy might have been dead for two weeks before the bombing - and we wouldn't know - would we? (Toss the corpse in a deep freeze. It'll thaw in the explosion)

It is an absolute myth that everyone who commits suicide writes a note. That is actually rare in reality. Outside the issue of terrorism, in everyday mundane suicide.  Some do write suicide notes, but the majority do not. Family members and friends sometimes can have an indicator of their mental state prior to a suicide, but even then, that isn't always the case. I can tell you having suffered from depression and having been suicidal myself, I never told my mom about it, and I would have done it without leaving a note. But I also would not dream of harming anyone if I did, or destroying property if I did kill myself.  Most humans who commit suicide merely are tired of living and have no desire to take it out on others. 

And again, even with terrorism, not every terrorist writes a manifesto. Most of the time terrorists simply do it then others take credit for inspiring them to do it. In the case of this guy, investigators are currently saying he acted alone. 

Don't know what to say to that last line. Why do you seem to be looking for a nutty conspiracy?

[arewethereyet]

I must disagree. This assumes he believed people would link his ownership of the RV to him being the bomber.

He provided proof that he was the bomber, the larger bones survived the blast. Edge back from the absurd.

Citation please.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

I've picked bone fragments out of my hair, sorry I didn't save you a citation.

[arewethereyet]

I've picked bone fragments out of my hair, sorry I didn't save you a citation.

Seems like a lot of speculation on your part.

I realize you are an expert in skeletal identification but there doesn't seem to be any news sources claiming the discovery of large bone fragments found...maybe "tissue" is all-encompassing and can be anything from a fingernail to a femur.

You are spit-balling this as much as anyone else here.

[Brian37]

I've picked bone fragments out of my hair, sorry I didn't save you a citation.

Just looking at the video surrounding that vehicle, after the blast, even the parts of the vehicle were small. Conspiracy theorists of 9/11 swore the jet that hit the Pentagon was not a jet but a bomb. They didn't want to face reality in that a jet that speed would would be like paper going through a paper shredder. 

I can very easily see a human body in that kind of explosion, even bones, being easily either incinerated or blasted into crumb size. If that vehicle blast doesn't leave huge parts, it most certainly can destroy a human leaving nothing but small amounts of tissue.