Posts: 7677
Threads: 635
Joined: January 19, 2013
Reputation:
30
Anti-nuclear bomb?
August 15, 2021 at 10:59 am
(This post was last modified: August 15, 2021 at 11:01 am by WinterHold.)
Nuclear weapons were a symbol of inhumane cruelty and barbarity; a symbol of the imperialistic world dominated by western colonists with mad dreams of greatness that caused the world to fight 2 world wars and finishes the age with the detonation of a hellish, demonic weapon known as "the atomic weapon" borrowed from the stars themselves; leaving victims as goo on the walls with only their shadows to tell their tale.
But my topic is not about this demonic investion: rather it's about an "anti nuclear bomb" that will suck the destructive artificial star; for that an artificial "black hole" must be generated to counter the deadly effect of nuclear bombs.
Actually, such thing is possible and proved to exist too:
https://www.livescience.com/black-hole-a...wking.html
Quote:Researchers at the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology did just that. They created a black hole analog out of a few thousand . They were trying to confirm two of Hawking's most important predictions, that Hawking radiation arises from nothing and that it does not change in intensity over time, meaning it's stationary.
"A black hole is supposed to radiate like a black body, which is essentially a warm object that emits a constant infrared radiation," study co-author Jeff Steinhauer, an associate professor of physics at Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, told Phys.org. "Hawking suggested that black holes are just like regular stars, which radiate a certain type of radiation all the time, constantly. That's what we wanted to confirm in our study, and we did."
Nuclear weapons are cancer, and a disease that shouldn't exist. Generating stars on earth is a demonic practice that will bring the end of earth. But the God that made stars also made the "vacuum tubes" that sucks them into oblivion.
Throw your shoes in the faces of colonists and their atomic bombs; and spread the news.
Posts: 9538
Threads: 410
Joined: October 3, 2018
Reputation:
17
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb?
August 15, 2021 at 11:02 am
You had to go and despite their warnings - do the brown acid - didn't ya???
Posts: 28304
Threads: 522
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb?
August 15, 2021 at 11:58 am
Damn, how an I going to sell all those t-shirts now?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 9538
Threads: 410
Joined: October 3, 2018
Reputation:
17
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb?
August 15, 2021 at 12:11 pm
(August 15, 2021 at 11:58 am)brewer Wrote: Damn, how an I going to sell all those t-shirts now?
I had one that read -
Nuke the unborn gay whales.
Posts: 46099
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb?
August 15, 2021 at 12:30 pm
(August 15, 2021 at 10:59 am)WinterHold Wrote: Nuclear weapons were a symbol of inhumane cruelty and barbarity; a symbol of the imperialistic world dominated by western colonists with mad dreams of greatness that caused the world to fight 2 world wars and finishes the age with the detonation of a hellish, demonic weapon known as "the atomic weapon" borrowed from the stars themselves; leaving victims as goo on the walls with only their shadows to tell their tale.
But my topic is not about this demonic investion: rather it's about an "anti nuclear bomb" that will suck the destructive artificial star; for that an artificial "black hole" must be generated to counter the deadly effect of nuclear bombs.
Actually, such thing is possible and proved to exist too:
https://www.livescience.com/black-hole-a...wking.html
Quote:Researchers at the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology did just that. They created a black hole analog out of a few thousand . They were trying to confirm two of Hawking's most important predictions, that Hawking radiation arises from nothing and that it does not change in intensity over time, meaning it's stationary.
"A black hole is supposed to radiate like a black body, which is essentially a warm object that emits a constant infrared radiation," study co-author Jeff Steinhauer, an associate professor of physics at Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, told Phys.org. "Hawking suggested that black holes are just like regular stars, which radiate a certain type of radiation all the time, constantly. That's what we wanted to confirm in our study, and we did."
Nuclear weapons are cancer, and a disease that shouldn't exist. Generating stars on earth is a demonic practice that will bring the end of earth. But the God that made stars also made the "vacuum tubes" that sucks them into oblivion.
Throw your shoes in the faces of colonists and their atomic bombs; and spread the news.
I’m delighted to see that your ignorance of science continues apace.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb?
August 15, 2021 at 12:31 pm
(This post was last modified: August 15, 2021 at 12:42 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(August 15, 2021 at 10:59 am)WinterHold Wrote: Nuclear weapons were a symbol of inhumane cruelty and barbarity; a symbol of the imperialistic world dominated by western colonists with mad dreams of greatness that caused the world to fight 2 world wars and finishes the age with the detonation of a hellish, demonic weapon known as "the atomic weapon" borrowed from the stars themselves; leaving victims as goo on the walls with only their shadows to tell their tale.
But my topic is not about this demonic investion: rather it's about an "anti nuclear bomb" that will suck the destructive artificial star; for that an artificial "black hole" must be generated to counter the deadly effect of nuclear bombs.
Actually, such thing is possible and proved to exist too:
https://www.livescience.com/black-hole-a...wking.html
Quote:Researchers at the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology did just that. They created a black hole analog out of a few thousand . They were trying to confirm two of Hawking's most important predictions, that Hawking radiation arises from nothing and that it does not change in intensity over time, meaning it's stationary.
"A black hole is supposed to radiate like a black body, which is essentially a warm object that emits a constant infrared radiation," study co-author Jeff Steinhauer, an associate professor of physics at Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, told Phys.org. "Hawking suggested that black holes are just like regular stars, which radiate a certain type of radiation all the time, constantly. That's what we wanted to confirm in our study, and we did."
Nuclear weapons are cancer, and a disease that shouldn't exist. Generating stars on earth is a demonic practice that will bring the end of earth. But the God that made stars also made the "vacuum tubes" that sucks them into oblivion.
Throw your shoes in the faces of colonists and their atomic bombs; and spread the news.
Not knowing what a vacuum tube is, and thinking is might somehow be conceptually related to vacuuming as in sucking things up, is really, really, very sad. Less Koran, more education, is always the answer. Heed the answer.
Yes, of course, an artificial black hole able to consume a nuclear weapon would be far, far, less dangerous than the nuclear weapon it consumes.
You realize the process of accreting the mass of a hydrogen bomb into the black hole can release many hundreds of times more destructive energy into the surrounding than if you simply detonated the hydrogen bombs, right?
Quasar ring a bell? You can be making a miniature quasar on earth if you have a black hole on earth big enough to suck in a hydrogen bomb and you start feeding it hydrogen bombs.
Posts: 16448
Threads: 127
Joined: July 10, 2013
Reputation:
65
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb?
August 15, 2021 at 1:38 pm
Maybe we could put Winter with FlatAssembler and they can just try to out-stupid one another.
Posts: 1465
Threads: 31
Joined: November 29, 2020
Reputation:
8
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb?
August 15, 2021 at 1:49 pm
(This post was last modified: August 15, 2021 at 1:50 pm by Spongebob.)
If I could just stop laughing I might be able to post a reply to this nonsense....
...nope, not happening...
Actually the funniest part is that he's actually suggesting someone create a black hole on earth to suck up all the nukes, and that is somehow less dangerous than all the nukes.....
Why is it so?
~Julius Sumner Miller
Posts: 7677
Threads: 635
Joined: January 19, 2013
Reputation:
30
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb?
August 15, 2021 at 3:10 pm
(This post was last modified: August 15, 2021 at 3:11 pm by WinterHold.)
Just for readers of the topic:
https://www.quora.com/What-would-happen-...20material.
Quote:interesting question,
Blackholes are spheres with very very high gravitational force. Even light can not escape that force. So even if the bomb explodes, we won't be able to observe it. Blackholes are made from high density neutron star. You can’t expect a blackhole to be destroyed just by an explosion of neuclear weapon.
Bomb explosion would release a huge amount of energy (assuming it reaches the “surface” of blackhole and explodes). Blackhole treats energy and mass equally. So it will absorb all the energy released by the bomb.
Lets assume we throw the bomb at event horizon. Time is slow there, much much slower then in our normal world. So before the bomb reaches the center, we might have passed 100s or 1000s of earth years. So if you are the person to drop the bomb, you probably wouldn't be the person to observe it when it explodes. Fascinating, isn't it ?
A black hole is how you make atomic bombs get lost for 100s or 1000s of earth years near the hole's event horizon.
Don't believe the misleading posts trying to cover this fact .
Posts: 16933
Threads: 461
Joined: March 29, 2015
Reputation:
30
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb?
August 15, 2021 at 4:22 pm
Again, another nonsense. People have been creating nano black holes which is a huge difference from actual black holes.
If someone could make a black hole that could "suck" a whole atom bomb explosion with its gravity, then that black hole would be a much bigger problem than the atom bomb because it would "suck" everything else. Not to mention the impossible amounts of energy it would take to make and sustain that hole.
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
|