Pitbulls

[Goosebump]

not saying you didn't read it... but it says clearly... to requote it:

The DNA evidence in scientific studies reveals that the breed information for the vast majority of bite-related incidents (including fatal attacks) attributed to pitbull-type dogs is inaccurate and not reliable. Instead, the scientific data and DNA information validates that the majority of dogs implicated in these incidents are in fact non-pitbull type breeds or numerous different mixed breeds that have been misidentified as "pitbulls" or pitbull-type dogs.

---

I don't know how to make it clearer. Please help me to do so as I lack the capacity to see how much clearer I can be than the above statement made by a scientific reporter reporting on science.

Are you really this dense? DNA evidence in shelter dog identification , blah, blah, blah.

Dogs are bred for certain characteristics/traits. Hunting dogs point/flush, retrievers, well, they retrieve, duck tollers and sheepdogs-guess what they do, all without training (look at puppy behavior). Some dogs are bred to be protect/attack and will with or without training. Will all of them have the drive to attack, nope, but a high percentage will. 

Look at attack reports, bite reports, and insurance coverage denial by bred.......... Just because some dogs were misidentified in shelters as pitbulls does not mean shit.

BTW, your OP is incorrect, to quote you "but pitbulls are not big dogs". Some can be small, but they can get up to ~85 lbs, that's not small or little by dog standards.

You are biased, you only know the one dog.

"look at attack reports" but those might be biased by evidence suggested in the before mentioned...

Do you often discount evidence you don't agree with?

Vets agree a healthy weight of a pitbull at say, 7 to 8 years old (middle aged) is 55 to 65 lbs.

Yah a dog can be fat. Doesn't make it big?

A Labrador should be 55 to 75lbs at 2 years. Which dog do you think is bigger?

You accuse me of bias, but clearly have no claim to understand or education yourself. Just your fear. I get it, your afraid of them. Because of some irrational information you've received, some chance encounter you happened to have, or some other unlikely event. Thanks for your post. Noted.

[brewer]

Are you really this dense? DNA evidence in shelter dog identification , blah, blah, blah.

Dogs are bred for certain characteristics/traits. Hunting dogs point/flush, retrievers, well, they retrieve, duck tollers and sheepdogs-guess what they do, all without training (look at puppy behavior). Some dogs are bred to be protect/attack and will with or without training. Will all of them have the drive to attack, nope, but a high percentage will. 

Look at attack reports, bite reports, and insurance coverage denial by bred.......... Just because some dogs were misidentified in shelters as pitbulls does not mean shit.

BTW, your OP is incorrect, to quote you "but pitbulls are not big dogs". Some can be small, but they can get up to ~85 lbs, that's not small or little by dog standards.

You are biased, you only know the one dog.

"look at attack reports" but those might be biased by evidence suggested in the before mentioned...

Do you often discount evidence you don't agree with?

Vets agree a healthy weight of a pitbull at say, 7 to 8 years old (middle aged) is 55 to 65 lbs.

Yah a dog can be fat. Doesn't make it big?

A Labrador should be 55 to 75lbs at 2 years. Which dog do you think is bigger?

You accuse me of bias, but clearly have no claim to understand or education yourself. Just your fear. I get it, your afraid of them. Because of some irrational information you've received, some chance encounter you happened to have, or some other unlikely event. Thanks for your post. Noted.

Yep, no dog education what so ever, you nailed me.