Dec 8th Veritas Video

[Thumpalumpacus]

I was born with two sex toys, left- and right-hand, and I didn't need a goddamned teacher.

[Dio]

While I'm not going to post a link to the video (especially to avoid certain words), it is an undercover video with the Dean of Students at the Francis W. Parker School  in Chicago detailing the use of sex toys to 14-18 year olds. Is it the proper place for a school to introduce and explain the use sex toys to minors?

Is it that much crazier than showing kids how to put on a condom with a banana?

Yes, introducing minors at any age to sex toys is crazier than putting a condom on a banana.

[Dio]

Four hours of video and there's more?


I would concede that it's an edited interview, I don't see any context that would somehow mitigate the unbroken sentences that readily admit to using sex toys as educational material. The obvious context is queer pedagogy but no one is going to say the quiet part out loud, hence the purpose of undercover tactics.

Why would you need to deceptively edit an interview when your goal is to expose wrongdoing? The interview should be able to speak for itself without taking anything out of context.

They should release more footage, I would have no issue with that.

[Dio]

So we are supposed to discuss a video we can not see. Sweet.

And what is up with this Dio person? He registered back in 2012 and waited 10 years to start posting.

I forgot I even had the account. I would link the Twitter page but decided not to due to certain words in the hashtags. Didn't think about posting the PV link. Here

https://www.projectveritas.com/news/elit...-in-lgbtq/

[Fake Messiah]

So what is your point? If someone does something bad he should be punished, like fired. When it comes to this case it is not clear what happened because one side says one thing, while the other claims the opposite.

Or do you see some bigger picture? Maybe that all schools should be closed or something?

[Dio]

I have become a pretty big fan of the media bias/fact check site.  Why don't we take a look at what they have to say about project veritas?

For those of you who don't want to bother to click the link, here you go:



Hmmmmmmm..... let's see.  Extreme right, false claims, misinformation, low credibility, questionable source.......

And they're the only ones talking about this.  If the only media outlet that's talking about something has such low credibility, I'm inclined to question them.  Otherwise, we'd all be firmly convinced that batboy is flying around out there because that's what the National Enquirer told us 30 years ago.

Also, anyone who knows anything about video editing and communication and media knows how easy it is to take an innocent conversation and turn it into something malicious.

Even with video edit, the comments themselves are no spliced. The edits are just different comments. What kind of "innocent conversation" includes the details of the introduction of sex toys to minors? The logical "convesation" is that of a broader style of pedagogy and the dean detail a specific example.

[Fake Messiah]

Even with video edit, the comments themselves are no spliced. The edits are just different comments. What kind of "innocent conversation" includes the details of the introduction of sex toys to minors? The logical "convesation" is that of a broader style of pedagogy and the dean detail a specific example.

Is there anyone claiming to be a victim or is there just this video? Because if it is the latter, then it goes toward heavy manipulation.

[Dio]

Even with video edit, the comments themselves are no spliced. The edits are just different comments. What kind of "innocent conversation" includes the details of the introduction of sex toys to minors? The logical "convesation" is that of a broader style of pedagogy and the dean detail a specific example.

Is there anyone claiming to be a victim or is there just this video? Because if it is the latter, then it goes toward heavy manipulation.

It's basically the same comment that's broken up in the beginning but from 0:40 - 1:16 it's unbroken.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Veritas isn't a reliable source end of debate. I think this thread is now redundant really.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Yes, introducing minors at any age to sex toys is crazier than putting a condom on a banana.

Actually, it's not. There is less sexual about a condom than a sex toy really. I mean is there an actual objection other than "That's icky"