Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Time
April 9, 2011 at 6:20 pm
(This post was last modified: April 9, 2011 at 6:25 pm by Anomalocaris.)
A vague poll is by definition not specific just as a false statement is by definition not true. Also, it is untrue to say "it is mathematically impossible to control time" in the same way as saying it is mathematically impossible to control velocity or mass. Plenty of time controlling can be imagined under accepted mathematical frame describing time.
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Time
April 9, 2011 at 6:27 pm
(This post was last modified: April 9, 2011 at 6:43 pm by Anomalocaris.)
The equations involving time solves in such a way that relative rate of passage of time can be changed by changing other quantities over which we have definite control, like relative velocity. The validity of these equation has been experiementally verified. So not only does math say tIme can be controlled, we've actually proven the concept, in a relatively minor scale.
Posts: 330
Threads: 14
Joined: February 7, 2011
Reputation:
2
RE: Time
April 9, 2011 at 6:43 pm
Equations are a different branch in mathematics.
Do you know what discreet math is?
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Time
April 9, 2011 at 6:44 pm
(This post was last modified: April 9, 2011 at 6:46 pm by Anomalocaris.)
I think you should assume that i do. Your logic had better not contradict results drawn from any branch of math.
Posts: 79
Threads: 9
Joined: April 8, 2011
Reputation:
3
RE: Time
April 9, 2011 at 11:35 pm
(This post was last modified: April 9, 2011 at 11:37 pm by Sarcasm.)
"Computers can control time. they're doing it right now!*"
Couldn't time itself just be an illusion?
~ Give a man a fish and you'll feed him for a day, give a man a religion and he'll die praying for a fish.