Fundies Will Be Shitting Bricks

[tavarish]

over this one!

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/201...ecule.html

Meanwhile, back on Earth at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Cambridge, UK, have created synthetic molecules that copy genetic material. The enzyme, tC19Z, that has been synthesised could be an artificial version of one of the first enzymes that ever existed on our planet three billion years ago -- and a clue to how life itself got started. Their goal is to create fully self-replicating RNA molecules in the lab.

Atheistic evolutionary fundies? Into ID? Whatever next?

LOL... With regards to "how life itself got started" and "three billion years".....
The scientific method has four "steps" - Observe, hypothesise, test and demonstrate - and since there was no-one there to comply with the first "step". It's all just GUESSING... or should that be wishful thinking... or, perhaps, Pi**ING IN THE WIND.

The latter definitely.
You people will believe any old bollox.


Oh, by the way........ Hi All

FH

Let's all just calm the fuck down, shall we?

1. You've been provided with the actual layout of the scientific method. You're missing a few steps.

2. Are you really making the argument that if no human was there to record it, then we have no observation? I'm beginning to think you don't know what an observation is. Here, let me spoonfeed it to you since you're busy throwing intellectual tripe at everyone else:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observation...in_science

Observation is either an activity of a living being (such as a human), consisting of receiving knowledge of the outside world through the senses, or the recording of data using scientific instruments. The term may also refer to any data collected during this activity. An observation can also be the way you look at things or when you look at something.

Do you understand that ANY data collected is an observation in science?

3. I will accept anything that is readily demonstrable and verifiable in reality. If RNA can be replicated in a lab using conditions that were similar to a forming Earth, and those results are measurable, consistent, and pass the rigors of peer review, then that provides us the best explanation of how life formed on Earth. Saying an unverifiable deity did it doesn't expand our knowledge of anything, because you have to first provide evidence of that deity's existence.

Your text speaks volumes about how ignorant you are in regards to scientific discovery. To equate demonstrable evidence to pissing in the wind is something that could only come from someone that is intellectually dishonest at worst and severely misguided at best.

Go learn you a book, lightweight.

[reverendjeremiah]

Hey stupid ( redundant in the case of xtians, I know)

LMFAO - THAT is the Min I know and love. God Bless you Min!

I've got over 5,000 posts on this board. I LIVE here and I've been here a long time. I've seen shitheads like you come and go plenty of times.

Preach it brother..PREACH IT! Give our fading guest the good news.

Sorry, Rev. I like to play with the trolls and their absurd notions of god.

No problem Min. Feel free to smack the Trolls around all you like, or at least until one of the Moderators finally decides to kick this troll back under the bridge. I have a good NEW name for the trolls on this forum: "SHIT LIPS". Yeah, because everything they say is shit.

So FH ( Fuck Head? ) I invite you to earnestly pray for your fucking god to strike me dead.

FH? Friendly Hug? Fucking Hypocrite? Fuckin' Humpin'? Fag Humper?

I'll continue to drop in and insult you and him every day so you know that your god either doesn't exist or is telling you to go fuck yourself. Your choice.

Shall I join you as well? Been a while since we have done a tag team match.

[Anomalocaris]

.....

I think anyone who wallow in the bluster of "faith" doesn't much care for the tedium of finding out, much less doing it in a systematic way, even less in a highly systematic and cross examined way, like the scientific method.

[FoeHammer]

Blah blah blah.

For fuck sake. Another idiot. We've moved on. Try to keep up. The question is:
From nothing (no thing) to something (a singularity) How?


FH

[tavarish]

Blah blah blah.

For fuck sake. Another idiot. We've moved on. Try to keep up. The question is:
From nothing (no thing) to something (a singularity) How?


FH

Cute.

Here you go:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ImvlS8PLIo

$5 says you don't learn a damn thing from it.

[Autumnlicious]

Nice to see you again Tav.

[LastPoet]

Blah blah blah.

For fuck sake. Another idiot. We've moved on. Try to keep up. The question is:
From nothing (no thing) to something (a singularity) How?


FH

I am now convinced this guy is a troll, you can let him go on, but the mighty banhammer is slower than usual. I do beg the mods to evaluate what contribution this user had. I'm not raging, but if we leave complete nutcases roam around in number then its chaos we can't predict. His argument ends up in a special pleading for his god, so can we please go on?

[Anomalocaris]

That he is a troll is not obvious enough from his stated religious view?

[Violet]

Tavarish! ^_^

Where in the name of Susan have you been?

[orogenicman]

Blah blah blah.

For fuck sake. Another idiot. We've moved on. Try to keep up. The question is:
From nothing (no thing) to something (a singularity) How?


FH

I am now convinced this guy is a troll, you can let him go on, but the mighty banhammer is slower than usual. I do beg the mods to evaluate what contribution this user had. I'm not raging, but if we leave complete nutcases roam around in number then its chaos we can't predict. His argument ends up in a special pleading for his god, so can we please go on?

But chaos reigns supreme! Repent, reformat, reboot.