Posts: 40
Threads: 6
Joined: March 2, 2024
Reputation:
2
Lazy Atheism?
March 4, 2024 at 8:00 pm
Okay I admit the title is clickbait. I love the fact that so many atheists have a lot of knowledge about certain religions and are able to deconstruct the texts. However it has always seemed to me that since "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" the burden of proof should fall on the religious rather than those who disbelieve.
I would love to hear more "lazy atheist" arguments based on the the most basic flawed logic of religious beliefs. Prima facie simple arguments. Like do we really have to read the entire Bible when the first few pages of Genesis conflict with scientific facts we now know? Such as that the genetic diversity of the human race means we could not possibly have evolved from a single mating pair 6,000 years ago?
I've always wished that atheist debates with theists would focus more on the basic, simple stuff.
Another one for me is why didn't Jesus write down his own teachings (or have someone else write them down at the time he taught), since presumably being God he knew that controversies over authorship would arise in the future? Certainly if he'd intended to start a new religion, he should have done this. Why did he not? This seems like a really important question that gets ignored. When I was a child listening to Mass, I remember thinking that his words to Peter "on this rock I build my church" was clearly metaphorical and only make sense if he didn't actually intend to start a church.
And if Jesus gave a crap about abortion or homosexuality, how come he never mentioned either? Yet these are things modern Christian fundamentalists/evangelicals focus on to the exclusion of all else.
Posts: 16335
Threads: 127
Joined: July 10, 2013
Reputation:
65
RE: Lazy Atheism?
March 4, 2024 at 8:18 pm
I was raised Catholic but none of it ever really took with me. The Bible stories I was told as a kid, I saw as just stories with some sort of lesson - or threat.
Moving to a Catholic town when I was 11 didn't help...no one seemed to practice what they supposedly believed in. I went to mass and to Catholic schools and still none of it really impressed me.
I went on a quest in my early 20s thinking that I HAD to believe in something religion-wise. I looked around and nothing spoke to me.
For the last ten or so years I have been active on atheist forums. I have learned more about the Bible and about other religions than I did in 7 years of Catholic school and 5 years of Catechism classes before that.
Posts: 45917
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Lazy Atheism?
March 4, 2024 at 8:23 pm
(March 4, 2024 at 8:00 pm)Jillybean Wrote: Okay I admit the title is clickbait. I love the fact that so many atheists have a lot of knowledge about certain religions and are able to deconstruct the texts. However it has always seemed to me that since "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" the burden of proof should fall on the religious rather than those who disbelieve.
I would love to hear more "lazy atheist" arguments based on the the most basic flawed logic of religious beliefs. Prima facie simple arguments. Like do we really have to read the entire Bible when the first few pages of Genesis conflict with scientific facts we now know? Such as that the genetic diversity of the human race means we could not possibly have evolved from a single mating pair 6,000 years ago?
I've always wished that atheist debates with theists would focus more on the basic, simple stuff.
Another one for me is why didn't Jesus write down his own teachings (or have someone else write them down at the time he taught), since presumably being God he knew that controversies over authorship would arise in the future? Certainly if he'd intended to start a new religion, he should have done this. Why did he not? This seems like a really important question that gets ignored. When I was a child listening to Mass, I remember thinking that his words to Peter "on this rock I build my church" was clearly metaphorical and only make sense if he didn't actually intend to start a church.
And if Jesus gave a crap about abortion or homosexuality, how come he never mentioned either? Yet these are things modern Christian fundamentalists/evangelicals focus on to the exclusion of all else.
(Bold mine)
They focus on those because - whether they admit it or not - Christians prefer Paul to Jesus.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 40
Threads: 6
Joined: March 2, 2024
Reputation:
2
RE: Lazy Atheism?
March 4, 2024 at 8:36 pm
(March 4, 2024 at 8:23 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (March 4, 2024 at 8:00 pm)Jillybean Wrote: Okay I admit the title is clickbait. I love the fact that so many atheists have a lot of knowledge about certain religions and are able to deconstruct the texts. However it has always seemed to me that since "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" the burden of proof should fall on the religious rather than those who disbelieve.
I would love to hear more "lazy atheist" arguments based on the the most basic flawed logic of religious beliefs. Prima facie simple arguments. Like do we really have to read the entire Bible when the first few pages of Genesis conflict with scientific facts we now know? Such as that the genetic diversity of the human race means we could not possibly have evolved from a single mating pair 6,000 years ago?
I've always wished that atheist debates with theists would focus more on the basic, simple stuff.
Another one for me is why didn't Jesus write down his own teachings (or have someone else write them down at the time he taught), since presumably being God he knew that controversies over authorship would arise in the future? Certainly if he'd intended to start a new religion, he should have done this. Why did he not? This seems like a really important question that gets ignored. When I was a child listening to Mass, I remember thinking that his words to Peter "on this rock I build my church" was clearly metaphorical and only make sense if he didn't actually intend to start a church.
And if Jesus gave a crap about abortion or homosexuality, how come he never mentioned either? Yet these are things modern Christian fundamentalists/evangelicals focus on to the exclusion of all else.
(Bold mine)
They focus on those because - whether they admit it or not - Christians prefer Paul to Jesus.
Boru
Quotes from Paul on abortion? I'm aware he condemned homosexuality, but what did he say about abortion?
Posts: 45917
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Lazy Atheism?
March 4, 2024 at 9:31 pm
(March 4, 2024 at 8:36 pm)Jillybean Wrote: (March 4, 2024 at 8:23 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (Bold mine)
They focus on those because - whether they admit it or not - Christians prefer Paul to Jesus.
Boru
Quotes from Paul on abortion? I'm aware he condemned homosexuality, but what did he say about abortion?
Romans 1:28-32. While it doesn’t specifically mention abortion, it talks about murder and depravity, which many fundies claim includes the killing of the unborn.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Lazy Atheism?
March 4, 2024 at 10:18 pm
(This post was last modified: March 4, 2024 at 10:19 pm by Jackalope.)
Lazy atheism -
If an omnipotent god created me, it would necessarily know what would convince me of it's existence. I can conclude that either such a god did not create me, or it doesn't care that I don't believe, which I am happy to oblige.
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Lazy Atheism?
March 4, 2024 at 10:21 pm
(March 4, 2024 at 9:31 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (March 4, 2024 at 8:36 pm)Jillybean Wrote: Quotes from Paul on abortion? I'm aware he condemned homosexuality, but what did he say about abortion?
Romans 1:28-32. While it doesn’t specifically mention abortion, it talks about murder and depravity, which many fundies claim includes the killing of the unborn.
Boru
Sure they claim that, while twisting their brains in a knot looking for scriptural support.
I tell you, that God character is a terrible communicator.
Posts: 28262
Threads: 522
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: Lazy Atheism?
March 4, 2024 at 11:07 pm
1. Provide me concrete evidence for god(s) existing and I'll consider it.
2. No one can argue/debate god(s) into existence.
Is that lazy enough?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 32793
Threads: 1409
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
152
RE: Lazy Atheism?
March 4, 2024 at 11:09 pm
The epitome of lazy atheism: I'm an atheist because I trust other atheists know what they're talking about.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Posts: 4436
Threads: 13
Joined: September 27, 2018
Reputation:
17
RE: Lazy Atheism?
March 5, 2024 at 2:26 am
(March 4, 2024 at 8:00 pm)Jillybean Wrote: Okay I admit the title is clickbait. No, I think "lazy" is the right word. You're arguing in favor of your atheism with the easiest possible arguments.
Quote:Like do we really have to read the entire Bible when the first few pages of Genesis conflict with scientific facts we now know? Such as that the genetic diversity of the human race means we could not possibly have evolved from a single mating pair 6,000 years ago?
Do you really think that a literalist reading of Genesis is essential to Christianity? If you think "the world wasn't created in six days" is sufficient to make all of Christianity unbelievable, then I think that's a bit too lazy.
Quote:I've always wished that atheist debates with theists would focus more on the basic, simple stuff.
Well, sure... If you focus on the simple stuff you can knock down a straw man or two and then go home satisfied. But you've made it too easy on yourself.
You know the Archbishop of Canterbury doesn't believe in a literal Genesis, and is quite aware that arguments against sodomy or abortion are not clearly stated by Jesus? Non-lazy people might look into the theory of natural law, which is used by many Christians (since at least the time of Thomas Aquinas) to argue against certain practices, even if there is only tenuous biblical support for this.
You don't have to learn anything about the history of Christian thought. Lots of people have long happy lives without knowing anything about it. But if you're going to be making claims about the believability of what Christians have said, it might make sense to know what the smart ones think.
|