Posts: 15755
Threads: 194
Joined: May 15, 2009
Reputation:
145
RE: BBC BIBLE BASHING
April 25, 2011 at 2:39 pm
downbeatplumb Wrote:British TV is great.
They have a british accent. And they don't have guns.
British tv sucks
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Posts: 1965
Threads: 83
Joined: June 15, 2010
Reputation:
37
RE: BBC BIBLE BASHING
April 25, 2011 at 3:23 pm
(April 24, 2011 at 3:10 pm)Napoleon666 Wrote: interesting feedback. i'm surprised so many people on an atheist forum would be all for giving these religious nutjobs time on our tv's.
It's your TV, but it's everyone's TV station.
"How is it that a lame man does not annoy us while a lame mind does? Because a lame man recognizes that we are walking straight, while a lame mind says that it is we who are limping." - Pascal
Posts: 736
Threads: 29
Joined: September 8, 2010
Reputation:
10
RE: BBC BIBLE BASHING
April 26, 2011 at 5:47 am
(April 25, 2011 at 10:16 am)Napoleon666 Wrote: (April 25, 2011 at 9:20 am)Skipper Wrote: The BBC in no way gives religion in general, or a specific religion, excessive air time. It represents the views of (whether we like it or not) a fair sized part of the population proportionately. I see no reason why the BBC shouldn't show religious programmes. You don't have to watch them, in the same way I don't have to watch any of the shit I don't like or agree with or in the same way a religious person probably dosen't want to watch (or fund) documentaries that are against their views or standpoint. To ban something because it dosen't line up with your ideals is the exact sort of bullshit many of us hate about oppressive and fundamentalist religions. If we are all paying to fund the BBC it is only fair that all sides of a subject are told.
well i happen to disagree with this for the sole reason that i think religion is wrong from the start. it's fine giving both sides of a point, but when one side of a point is blatently WRONG or if you like unproven then why the fuck should it be given the time of day?
if 99% of the country said they wanted to watch a program telling us about the existance of invisible pink unicorns i'd sure as hell be just as annoyed if it was shown when it's being paid for by me. sorry, but that's just where i stand.
Well thank god you are not in charge of anything then. I value the will of the majority over being told by one person, or a minority what I cannot do, watch or say.
Posts: 4807
Threads: 291
Joined: October 29, 2008
Reputation:
35
RE: BBC BIBLE BASHING
April 26, 2011 at 5:50 am
I would be in favour of privatizing the BBC completely if it would be able to maintain its current level without funds from the British taxpayer. But that is different from the question if the BBC should be allowed to have various religions and world views their own programs. I'm all for equal representation, but unfortunately even with the BBC I don't see that. I'd love to see a good BBC documentary about Sikhism for instance, or Jainism, but I don't see that happen any time soon.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Posts: 736
Threads: 29
Joined: September 8, 2010
Reputation:
10
RE: BBC BIBLE BASHING
April 26, 2011 at 6:01 am
(April 26, 2011 at 5:50 am)leo-rcc Wrote: I would be in favour of privatizing the BBC completely if it would be able to maintain its current level without funds from the British taxpayer. But that is different from the question if the BBC should be allowed to have various religions and world views their own programs. I'm all for equal representation, but unfortunately even with the BBC I don't see that. I'd love to see a good BBC documentary about Sikhism for instance, or Jainism, but I don't see that happen any time soon.
Do you think it would be possible to maintain the quality of the BBC whilst it also has to turn to commercial sources for its funding?
I don't see any precedence for that and believe that the reason it can and does produce the quality programming it does is due mostly to how it is funded. But yea, perhaps this is another topic?
Posts: 7388
Threads: 168
Joined: February 25, 2009
Reputation:
45
RE: BBC BIBLE BASHING
April 26, 2011 at 6:07 am
(This post was last modified: April 26, 2011 at 8:54 pm by Oldandeasilyconfused.)
(April 25, 2011 at 6:05 am)Aerzia Saerules Arktuos Wrote: The british taxpayer shouldn't have to be paying taxes for BBC to stay afloat. Who watches british television anyway?
Here in Oz,I watch a LOT of BBC programmes because most of them are superior to almost anything produced in the US.
Currently I'm watching an excellent series, "The Borgias"
The BBC still makes comedies the US WISHES it could make.
BBC made:"Dr Who" and "Monty Python" and also makes my 2 favourite shows "Spooks" and
"QI"
Aezia my dear, I'm afraid you are talking ex rectum
Posts: 4807
Threads: 291
Joined: October 29, 2008
Reputation:
35
RE: BBC BIBLE BASHING
April 26, 2011 at 6:41 am
Yes, the BBC has been very good giving me Robotwars of course (which has always been great fun to participate in), but also Dr. Who, Top Gear, QI, Have I got news for you, Mock the week, and many great comedies. But most of all, their documentaries and series have been awesome (some of them together with HBO).
I agree with you skipper that in order to do some of these programs, being dependent on advertisement is a cause for concern (biting the hand that feeds you and all that), and it is a very little known fact that some programs the BBC greenlighted were so expensive no commercial company would ever have invested in them. Only when these programs turn out to be a TV success, other channels get interested in them and do a knock-off version of it for half the budget.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Posts: 1965
Threads: 83
Joined: June 15, 2010
Reputation:
37
RE: BBC BIBLE BASHING
April 26, 2011 at 7:32 am
(April 26, 2011 at 6:07 am)padraic Wrote: Currently I'm watching an excellent series, "The Borgias"
I don't watch much television, but my girlfriend has fallen in love with that show. I didn't realize it was BBC.
"How is it that a lame man does not annoy us while a lame mind does? Because a lame man recognizes that we are walking straight, while a lame mind says that it is we who are limping." - Pascal
Posts: 12512
Threads: 202
Joined: January 3, 2010
Reputation:
107
RE: BBC BIBLE BASHING
April 26, 2011 at 9:36 am
(April 26, 2011 at 6:41 am)leo-rcc Wrote: Yes, the BBC has been very good giving me Robotwars of course (which has always been great fun to participate in), but also Dr. Who, Top Gear, QI, Have I got news for you, Mock the week, and many great comedies. But most of all, their documentaries and series have been awesome (some of them together with HBO).
I agree with you skipper that in order to do some of these programs, being dependent on advertisement is a cause for concern (biting the hand that feeds you and all that), and it is a very little known fact that some programs the BBC greenlighted were so expensive no commercial company would ever have invested in them. Only when these programs turn out to be a TV success, other channels get interested in them and do a knock-off version of it for half the budget.
My son LOVES 'Robot Wars'!!! So much . I'll have a word with him. He STILL watches it!
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
Posts: 736
Threads: 29
Joined: September 8, 2010
Reputation:
10
RE: BBC BIBLE BASHING
April 26, 2011 at 9:44 am
(This post was last modified: April 26, 2011 at 9:47 am by Skipper.)
All of the comedy dvd's in my collection (except peep show (a Channel 4 production)) are either BBC (Mighty boosh, Alan partridge, 15 storeys high, Fawlty Towers, Blackadder, The office, Allo' Allo', The thick of it, Only fools and Horses) or HBO (Flight of the conchords, curb your enthusiasm), HBO is an amazing American network, by the way.
|