Black Holes Don’t Exist!

[Rift Zone]

Administrator Notice
Massive wall of text deleted. You have no more freebies - please familiarize yourself with the Rules.

Moderator Notice
Please refrain from copy and pasting large walls of text you have posted elsewhere

[Alan V]

You do know that scientists have taken a picture of a black hole, right?

Also, LIGO has recorded multiple incidences of gravitational waves from the collisions of black holes.

[Paleophyte]

What is Mother Nature telling us here?

Don't let amateurs try to science? Don't let amateurs try to internet?

[Rift Zone]

You do know that scientists have taken a picture of a black hole, right?

Also, LIGO has recorded multiple incidences of gravitational waves from the collisions of black holes.

We have images of accretion disks!   What's inside those disks is a matter of interpretation.     Same with LIGO, disagree with that interpretation, but that's another topic entirely.

Don't let amateurs try to science? Don't let amateurs try to internet?

Funny thing about physics is there's only one authority: mother nature.  The theory that is more comprehensive and aligns with observation better is the more accurate theory.period.

[Paleophyte]

You do know that scientists have taken a picture of a black hole, right?

Also, LIGO has recorded multiple incidences of gravitational waves from the collisions of black holes.

We have images of accretion disks!   What's inside those disks is a matter of interpretation.     Same with LIGO, disagree with that interpretation, but that's another topic entirely.

Don't let amateurs try to science? Don't let amateurs try to internet?

Funny thing about physics is there's only one authority: mother nature.  The theory that is more comprehensive and aligns with observation better is the more accurate theory.period.

And what you have are interpretations.

[Rift Zone]

And what you have are interpretations.

Absolutely.

[Thumpalumpacus]

I ain't reading all that shit.

[Paleophyte]

And what you have are interpretations.

Absolutely.

Then you don't have a theory. You have some kooky notions that don't explain the data.

[Rift Zone]

Absolutely.

Then you don't have a theory. You have some kooky notions that don't explain the data.

Don''t think you thought that through.   The whole enterprise of physics revolves around making observations, then interpretations.   It's actually how science works.   Moving on... if your interpretations fit into a self-consistent cohesive whole, then you have a model/theory.   And if your theory seamlessly aligns with observation, you have a successful theory.  

You seem to be mostly through anger.   Still clearly in denial.   Though I think I see glimmers of bargaining in this one.   You're making great progress!  
4) there's nothing to be depressed about
5) the promised land awaits you.

[Sheldon]

You do know that scientists have taken a picture of a black hole, right?

Also, LIGO has recorded multiple incidences of gravitational waves from the collisions of black holes.

We have images of accretion disks!   What's inside those disks is a matter of interpretation.     Same with LIGO, disagree with that interpretation, but that's another topic entirely.

Don't let amateurs try to science? Don't let amateurs try to internet?

Funny thing about physics is there's only one authority: mother nature.  The theory that is more comprehensive and aligns with observation better is the more accurate theory.period.

Have you published your work, is it peer reviewed? There's nothing on any global news network about this paradigm shift in Physics?