RE: Guys is it true that sex is gay?
August 18, 2026 at 11:34 am
(This post was last modified: August 18, 2026 at 11:36 am by PepsiMAX.)
(August 16, 2026 at 12:15 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(August 16, 2026 at 9:04 am)PepsiMAX Wrote: Well. I think Rock n Roll culturally is what destroyed Christian morality. And it has been difficult to actually live like a Christian that way on a massive collective scale (Well that could also be an excuse? Because i mean... it likely didnt prevent Christians who lived in Roman times either to practice their faith despite how their system wasnt the majority back then)
But Gay means Happy. If you mean homosexual? I guess this must be a shitpost joke or something.
Galatians 5:13-26 would be what its like to live like a Christian. I aint all that into the culture war around Homosexuality, whether its for religious reasons or socialist.
Personally, I think Paul the Apostle destroyed not only Christian morality, but any hope of Christianity having a moral mandate.
And here you are, talking about religion.
Boru
I dunno. I think Paul the Apostle seemed like a knowledgable theologian to me. He usually uses old testament and compares the new testament often.
I can try to give one example
Romans 9:6-8
6 It is not as though God’s word had failed. For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel. 7 Nor because they are his descendants are they all Abraham’s children. On the contrary, “It is through Isaac that your offspring will be reckoned.”[a] 8 In other words, it is not the children by physical descent who are God’s children, but it is the children of the promise who are regarded as Abraham’s offspring.
Now here Paul is giving an example of the story of Esau and Jacob. Where its not ethnic birth that determines it, but who God chooses through promise (Btw i should note. But Zionism was originally Secular. Just saying). I would say, this is a pretty solid theological argument? Or let me know if you disagree on this.
If i were to try it out myself though

Isaiah 53:11 After he has suffered, he will see the light of life[a] and be satisfied[b]; by his knowledge[c] my righteous servant will justify many, and he will bear their iniquities.
If we were to compare this to Jewish apologetics, they will say "Servant" in this context refers to Israel. But at the time, the Jewish rabbis interpreted it to mean either a human individual or the established foundation of Israel. I think it was in 1000 AD where a Rabbi made it mean "Israel" in a literal sense. But its not like old testament hasnt been unknown to ascribe Israel to people such as Jacob either? Either case. Just one example one can bring up for theological debates.
If we go by the more obvious one "Daniel 7:13-14" and interpretation at "Daniel 7:26-27" which is what Jesus references in "Mark 14:62". I picked Mark because its said to be the oldest Gospel.



![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)