(October 27, 2011 at 4:17 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Nope, no argument from ignorance here,
Yes, you did appeal to ignorance.
Quote:I made a claim,That much is true.
Quote:I backed it upNo, you didn't.
Quote:and you helped me back it up.No, I didn't.
Quote:Not sure why you are still appealing to logic though,Because it works for me.
Quote: you have not given account for it.I don't need to.
Quote:Are these unicorns you believe in supernatural or natural?Sorry, I forgot. You can't use parody with Christians. They don't understand it.
Quote:Nope, the argumentum ad nauseum is when a person repeats an argument that has been refuted or shown to be invalid over and over hoping it sticks.Yes.
Quote:My argument has not been shown to be invalid or unsound
Yes, it has.
Quote:Again, why are you appealing to something you have not given account for (logic)?
Because I don't have to. I use logic because I like the results it brings.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
