RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 5, 2013 at 10:22 pm
(October 5, 2013 at 9:04 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:(October 5, 2013 at 4:26 pm)pocaracas Wrote: LOL.
READ!
Just one example, Lucy.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.10....21183/pdf
and where they found her:
Thank you for the picture.
Tuff 8: 3.46 +- 0.12 Ma
Tuff 7: 3.56 +- 0.2 Ma
Tuff 6: 3.78 +- 0.04 Ma
So they could be
Tuff 8: 3.58 Ma
Tuff 7: 3.36 Ma
Tuff 6: 3.74 Ma
So Tuff 7 could be younger than the layer above.
So they could be out of order.
That picture proved the topic's post.
I suggest you look into how geologic layers are formed before making such a ludicrous statement.
Bloody hell, you're stupid.