Zen and Lm,
Sure, there are things I have been wrong in- of course.
As for arrogant, I do realize I can come across that way, don't mean to.
The thing is when you indicate there is information (that is controversial) which you consider a fact- it looks arrogant, especially to a generation or two trained / immersed in the idea there is no immovable Truth- only constant changing evolutionary ideas.
But all that is beside the question posed.
Sure, there are things I have been wrong in- of course.
As for arrogant, I do realize I can come across that way, don't mean to.
The thing is when you indicate there is information (that is controversial) which you consider a fact- it looks arrogant, especially to a generation or two trained / immersed in the idea there is no immovable Truth- only constant changing evolutionary ideas.
But all that is beside the question posed.